Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A sample of 25 freshmen at a major university completed a survey that measured their degree of racial prejudice (the higher the score, the greater the prejudice). a. Compute the median and mean scores for these data. \(\begin{array}{lllll} 10 & 43 & 30 & 30 & 45 \\ 40 & 12 & 40 & 42 & 35 \\ 45 & 25 & 10 & 33 & 50 \\ 42 & 32 & 38 & 11 & 47 \\ 22 & 26 & 37 & 38 & 10 \end{array}\) b. These same 25 students completed the same survey during their senior year. Compute the median and mean for this second set of scores, and compare them to the earlier set. What happened? \(\begin{array}{lllll} 10 & 45 & 35 & 27 & 50 \\ 35 & 10 & 50 & 40 & 30 \\ 40 & 10 & 10 & 37 & 10 \\ 40 & 15 & 30 & 20 & 43 \\ 23 & 25 & 30 & 40 & 10 \end{array}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Freshman Year: Median = 35, Mean = 34.72.Senior Year: Median = 30, Mean = 31.8.Prejudice scores decreased over time.

Step by step solution

01

Organize the Data for Freshman Year

Arrange the data in ascending order. The given scores are: [10, 43, 30, 30, 45, 40, 12, 40, 42, 35, 45, 25, 10, 33, 50, 42, 32, 38, 11, 47, 22, 26, 37, 38, 10].When arranged: [10, 10, 10, 11, 12, 22, 25, 26, 30, 30, 32, 33, 35, 37, 38, 38, 40, 40, 42, 42, 43, 45, 45, 47, 50].
02

Compute the Median for Freshman Year

Since there are 25 scores, the median is the 13th value in the ordered list.The 13th value is 35. Therefore, median = 35.
03

Compute the Mean for Freshman Year

Sum all the scores and divide by the number of scores.Sum = 10 + 10 + 10 + 11 + 12 + 22 + 25 + 26 + 30 + 30 + 32 + 33 + 35 + 37 + 38 + 38 + 40 + 40 + 42 + 42 + 43 + 45 + 45 + 47 + 50 = 868.Mean = 868 / 25 = 34.72.
04

Organize the Data for Senior Year

Arrange the data in ascending order. The given scores are: [10, 45, 35, 27, 50, 35, 10, 50, 40, 30, 40, 10, 10, 37, 10, 40, 15, 30, 20, 43, 23, 25, 30, 40, 10].When arranged: [10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 15, 20, 23, 25, 27, 30, 30, 30, 30, 35, 35, 37, 40, 40, 40, 43, 45, 50, 50].
05

Compute the Median for Senior Year

Since there are 25 scores, the median is the 13th value in the ordered list.The 13th value is 30. Therefore, median = 30.
06

Compute the Mean for Senior Year

Sum all the scores and divide by the number of scores.Sum = 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 15 + 20 + 23 + 25 + 27 + 30 + 30 + 30 + 30 + 35 + 35 + 37 + 40 + 40 + 40 + 43 + 45 + 50 + 50 = 795.Mean = 795 / 25 = 31.8.
07

Compare the Results

For Freshman Year: Median = 35, Mean = 34.72.For Senior Year: Median = 30, Mean = 31.8.The median and mean scores have decreased from the freshman year to the senior year, indicating a decrease in racial prejudice over time.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

racial prejudice measurement
Racial prejudice measurement is an important aspect in social research as it helps in understanding changes in social attitudes over time. In this exercise, students were surveyed at the beginning and end of their university experience to measure their level of racial prejudice. The scores reflect their attitudes, with higher scores indicating greater prejudice.
This measurement is crucial as it provides data on how education and exposure to diverse environments might influence racial attitudes.
By comparing these scores, researchers can assess the impact university life has on reducing or increasing racial prejudice among students.
This type of data can inform policies and programs aimed at fostering more inclusive environments.
data organization
Organizing data is a fundamental step in any statistical analysis. In this exercise, the first task was to arrange the scores in ascending order.
Here's why this is important:
  • It allows for the easy identification of the median score, as the median is the middle value in an organized list.
  • It helps in visualizing the distribution of the data, which can indicate patterns such as clustering or outliers.
Proper data organization makes subsequent calculations straightforward and accurate.
For instance, when the scores from the freshman year were sorted, it became clear which value was the median and what the overall range of scores was.
Without organizing data first, any statistical analysis would be chaotic and prone to errors.
comparison of means and medians
Comparing means and medians provides a deeper understanding of data distribution.
Both are measures of central tendency, but they offer different insights:
  • **Median**: The middle number when data is ordered. It is not affected by extreme values (outliers).
  • **Mean**: The average value of the data. It can be skewed by outliers and extreme values.
In the exercise, the freshman year had a median of 35 and a mean of 34.72, whereas the senior year's median was 30 and mean was 31.8. These results showed a decrease in both median and mean scores, indicating a general decline in racial prejudice over the college years.
This comparison helps in understanding whether a few extreme scores are influencing the average or if the change is consistent across the whole dataset.
statistical analysis in social research
Statistical analysis is a powerful tool in social research, allowing researchers to draw meaningful insights from data.
Key elements include:
  • **Descriptive Statistics**: Summarizes data through means, medians, and ranges to provide a clear overview of the dataset.
  • **Inferential Statistics**: Allows researchers to make predictions or inferences about a population based on a sample.
In this exercise, the statistical analysis of racial prejudice scores highlighted changes over time, demonstrating how exposure to a university environment might influence students' attitudes.
These insights are valuable for developing targeted interventions aimed at reducing prejudice and promoting inclusivity.
Such analyses can inform policy decisions and help shape educational programs to create a more equitable society.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

As the head of a social services agency, you believe that your staff of 20 social workers is very much overworked compared to 10 years ago. The case loads for each worker are reported below for each of the two years in question. Has the average caseload increased? What measure of central tendency is most appropriate to answer this question? Why? $$\begin{array}{cccc} {2000} & & {2010} \\ \hline 52 & 55 & 42 & 82 \\ 50 & 49 & 75 & 50 \\ 57 & 50 & 69 & 52 \\ 49 & 52 & 65 & 50 \\ 45 & 59 & 58 & 55 \\ 65 & 60 & 64 & 65 \\ 60 & 65 & 69 & 60 \\ 55 & 68 & 60 & 60 \\ 42 & 60 & 50 & 60 \\ 50 & 42 & 60 & 60 \end{array}$$

Following are four variables for 30 cases from the General Social Survey. Age is reported in years. The variable happiness consists of answers to the question "Taken all together, would you say that you are (1) very happy (2) pretty happy, or (3) not too happy?" Respondents were asked how many sex partners they had over the past five years. Responses were measured on the following scale: \(0-4=\) actual numbers; \(5=5-10\) partners; \(6=11-20\) partners; \(7=21-100\) partners \(; 8=\) more than 100 . a. For each variable, find the appropriate measure of central tendency and write a sentence reporting this statistical information as you would in a research report. b. (This problem is optional.) For the variable age, construct a frequency distribution with interval size equal to 5 and the first interval set at \(20-24\). Compute the mean and median for the grouped data and compare with the values computed for the ungrouped data. How accurate are the estimates based on the grouped data?

You have compiled the following information on each of the graduates voted "most likely to succeed" by a local high school for a 10 -year period. For each variable, find the appropriate measure of central tendency. \(\begin{array}{ccccc} \text { Case } & \text {Present Income } & \text { Marital Status } & \text { Owns a Home? } & \text { Years of Education Post-High School } \\ \hline \text { A } & 104,000 & \text { Divorced } & \text { Yes } & 8 \\ \text { B } & 68,000 & \text { Divorced } & \text { No } & 4 \\ \text { C } & 54,000 & \text { Married } & \text { Yes } & 4 \\ \text { D } & 45,000 & \text { Married } & \text { No } & 4 \\ \text { E } & 40,000 & \text { Single } & \text { No } & 4 \\ \text { F } & 85,000 & \text { Separated } & \text { Yes } & 8 \\ \text { G } & 30,000 & \text { Married } & \text { No } & 3 \\ \text { H } & 27,000 & \text { Married } & \text { No } & 1 \\ \text { I } & 93,000 & \text { Married } & \text { Yes } & 6 \\ \text { J } & 48,000 & \text { Single } & \text { Yes } & 4 \end{array}\)

The following table lists the median family incomes for 13 Canadian provinces and territories in 2000 and 2006. Compute the mean and median for each year and compare the two measures of central tendency. Which measure of central tendency is greater for each year? Are the distributions skewed? In which direction? $$ \begin{array}{lcc} {\text { Province or Territory }} & 2000 & 2006 \\ \hline \text { Newfoundland and Labrador } & 38,800 & 50,500 \\ \text { Prince Edward Island } & 44,200 & 56,100 \\ \text { Nova Scotia } & 44,500 & 56,400 \\ \text { New Brunswick } & 43,200 & 54,000 \\ \text { Quebec } & 47,700 & 59,000 \\ \text { Ontario } & 55,700 & 66,600 \\ \text { Manitoba } & 47,300 & 58,700 \\ \text { Saskatchewan } & 45,800 & 60,500 \\ \text { Alberta } & 55,200 & 78,400 \\ \text { British Columbia } & 49,100 & 62,600 \\ \text { Yukon } & 56,000 & 76,000 \\ \text { Northwest Territories } & 61,000 & 88,800 \\ \text { Nunavut } & 37,600 & 54,300 \end{array} $$

You have been observing the local Democratic Party in a large city and have compiled some information about a small sample of party regulars. Find the appropriate measure of central tendency for each variable. $$\begin{array}{lllllll} \text { Respondent } & \text { Sex } & \text { Social Class } & \text { No. of Years in Party } & \text { Education } & \text { Marital Status } & \text { Number of Education } \\ \hline\\\ \text { A } & \text { M } & \text { High } & 32 & \text { High school } & \text { Married } & 5 \\ \text { B } & \text { M } & \text { Medium } & 17 & \text { High school } & \text { Married } & 0 \\ \text { C } & \text { M } & \text { Low } & 32 & \text { High school } & \text { Single } & 0 \\ \text { D } & \text { M } & \text { Low } & 50 & \text { Eighth grade } & \text { Widowed } & 7 \\ \text { E } & \text { M } & \text { Low } & 25 & \text { Fourth grade } & \text { Married } & 4 \\ \text { F } & \text { M } & \text { Medium } & 25 & \text { High school } & \text { Divorced } & 3 \\ \text { G } & \text { F } & \text { High } & 12 & \text { College } & \text { Divorced } & 3 \\ \text { H } & \text { F } & \text { High } & 10 & \text { College } & \text { Separated } & 2 \\ \text { ? } & \text { F } & \text { Medium } & 21 & \text { College } & \text { Married } & 1 \\ \text { J } & F & \text { Medium } & 33 & \text { College } & \text { Married } & 5 \\ \text { K } & \text { M } & \text { Low } & 37 & \text { High school } & \text { Single } & 0 \\ \text { L } & \text { F } & \text { Low } & 15 & \text { High school } & \text { Divorced } & 0 \\ \text { M } & \text { F } & \text { Low } & 31 & \text { Eighth grade } & \text { Widowed } & 1 \end{array}$$

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Sociology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free