Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Living and working in close proximity to someone is likely to increase our liking for that person because of ____________. a. in-group/out-group bias b. the mere exposure effect c. similarity d. the out-group homogeneity effect

Short Answer

Expert verified
b. the mere exposure effect

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Concepts

First, let's understand the concepts given in the options. The in-group/out-group bias is the tendency to favor one's own group over others. The mere exposure effect states that people tend to develop a preference for things merely because they are familiar with them. Similarity refers to having shared characteristics or beliefs, which often increases liking between people. The out-group homogeneity effect is the perception that members of an out-group are more similar than they actually are.
02

Analyzing Option a: In-group/Out-group Bias

This option suggests that living close increases liking due to group bias. However, the scenario does not specifically involve group identities or biases for one's own group, making this option less relevant in this context.
03

Considering Option b: The Mere Exposure Effect

The mere exposure effect posits that simply being exposed frequently to someone or something increases our liking for it. Living and working closely naturally increases the frequency of encounters, supporting this effect as an explanation.
04

Evaluating Option c: Similarity

Similarity can increase liking, but the exercise asks about proximity. While being close might increase chances of discovering similarities, it does not directly prove that similarity is the cause of increased liking by proximity.
05

Assessing Option d: The Out-group Homogeneity Effect

This effect involves perceptions of a group rather than individual liking due to proximity, making it unrelated to the concept of living and working closely.
06

Selecting the Best Answer

Considering the definitions and analyses of each option, the mere exposure effect most directly explains increased liking due to proximity, as it relies on repeated exposure rather than group dynamics or similarity.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

In-group/Out-group Bias
Understanding how we view those within our group compared to outsiders is essential in social psychology. The **in-group/out-group bias** is a common psychological phenomenon. It refers to the tendency where individuals favor and feel more positively towards members of their own group—the "in-group"—and sometimes feel negatively or suspiciously towards those in the "out-group." This bias can surface in various areas of life, including in schools, workplaces, and social networks. Here's why it happens:
  • Identity and Belongingness: Being part of a group can boost our self-esteem and give a sense of belonging, which leads to favoritism towards other group members.
  • Social Comparison: We tend to compare our group against others, often putting our own group in a superior position.
  • Perceived Threat: Sometimes, out-groups are seen as competitive or threatening, which can lead to bias against them.
While in-group/out-group bias doesn't necessarily apply directly to the mere exposure effect, understanding this bias helps when studying social dynamics and interactions.
Similarity
The concept of **similarity** is a core idea in understanding why we often prefer certain people over others. Similarity refers to the commonalities we share with others, such as beliefs, interests, or backgrounds. Here’s how similarity influences liking:
  • Shared Experiences: Finding common ground with others through shared experiences or backgrounds can create connections and foster friendships.
  • Validation and Comfort: Being around people who think like us makes us feel validated and understood, which naturally increases our liking for them.
  • Predictability: Similar individuals are often more predictable, creating a sense of safety in interactions and relationships.
Although similarity can definitely play a part in increasing liking, the exercise focuses more on the effects of mere exposure. However, it is important to note that proximity can sometimes lead to the discovery of these similarities, which in turn, enhance liking even further.
Out-group Homogeneity Effect
The **out-group homogeneity effect** is another intriguing concept in social psychology. This effect is the perception that individuals within an out-group are more similar to each other than is the case, whereas there is more variation among individuals within the in-group. Several reasons are behind this effect:
  • Limited Exposure: With less personal interaction with the out-group, there’s a tendency to underestimate the diversity within it.
  • Simplified Processing: To manage cognitive overload, people may group and stereotype others to make sense of social environments quickly.
  • Self-enhancement Bias: Seeing one’s own group as diversified allows people to feel unique and special, reinforcing positive self-view.
While useful for understanding group dynamics, this effect is not directly linked to the idea of increased liking due to proximity, making it less relevant in this context compared to the mere exposure effect.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Sasha loves to knit. She notices that when she knits with her knitting group, she seems to get more done than she would in the same amount of time knitting alone at home. Sasha's experience is most likely an example of ____________. a. informational conformity b. social loafing c. social facilitation d. the self-serving bias

Muzafer Sherif's study of the Eagles and Rattlers indicated that ______________ is the most useful way to reduce prejudice. a. punishment b. mere contact with out-group members c. cooperative contact between groups d. competition between groups

Which of the following would be least likely to reduce the risk of groupthink in a group? a. Having a strong group leader b. Allowing ample time for discussion of ideas c. Allowing visitors to attend group meetings d. Having low cohesiveness

Dr. Jones wants to test the hypothesis that being with one's own in-group (as opposed to being in the company of out-group members) increases the likelihood that one will express having racial prejudices. To test this hypothesis, Dr. Jones interviews White participants in the presence of White confederates and Black participants in the presence of Hispanic confederates. In conducting this study, Dr. Jones has inadvertently introduced a confounding variable into his study. What is it? a. Participant race b. Confederate race c. Experimenter race d. There are no confounds in this study

Which of the following is not an attitude? a. Liking rap music b. Believing that honesty is the best policy c. Believing that Atlanta is the capital of Georgia d. \(\quad\) All of the above are attitudes.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Psychology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free