Question

Check your understanding of the three basic types of conflict by identifying the type experienced in each of the following examples. The answers are in Appendix A. Types of conflict a. approach-approach b. avoidance-avoidance c. approach-avoidance __________ Vanessa has been shopping for a new car and is torn between a nifty little sports car and a classy sedan, both of which she really likes.

Short answer

Answer: Vanessa is experiencing an approach-approach conflict.

Step-by-step solution

Understand the example

Read the example carefully and identify the different options Vanessa has and what she feels about them. In this case, Vanessa is torn between a sports car and a sedan, and she likes both of them.

Understand the conflict types

1. Approach-approach conflict: A person must choose between two desirable outcomes or options. 2. Avoidance-avoidance conflict: A person must choose between two undesirable outcomes or options. 3. Approach-avoidance conflict: A person is attracted to something but simultaneously repelled by it, and he or she must decide whether to approach or avoid it.

Identify the type of conflict in the example

Since Vanessa is torn between two desirable options, she is experiencing an approach-approach conflict.

Key concepts

Approach-Approach Conflict

In psychology, understanding the dynamics of decision-making is essential, especially when it comes to conflicts. When we speak of an approach-approach conflict, it involves a choice between two equally attractive options, where one must be selected over the other. In the context of the exercise, Vanessa faces such a conflict as she has to decide between a sports car and a sedan, both of which appeal to her.

This type of conflict is often considered the least stressful, as the outcome in either case is positive. However, it does have the potential to create a psychological tug-of-war as the individual struggles to make a choice.

• The key is for one to weigh the benefits of each option
• Consider the long-term satisfaction they will provide
• Reflect on personal values and priorities

Through this process, a resolution to the approach-approach conflict can be achieved, leading to a satisfying decision making process.

Avoidance-Avoidance Conflict

On the flip side of the coin, we encounter the avoidance-avoidance conflict, where an individual is presented with two unfavorable outcomes and must choose the one that seems less daunting or harmful. These situations are more stress-inducing because the person is in a predicament where they have to settle for the 'lesser of two evils.'

Imagine being faced with the dilemma of either doing a tedious chore or paying a fine for not doing it. Both options are unappealing, which makes deciding quite difficult.

• It’s crucial to consider the long-term consequences of each choice
• One may need to find creative solutions or compromises

Effective resolution requires evaluating which option aligns more closely with one's ability to cope with the negative outcomes.

Approach-Avoidance Conflict

The third type, known as an approach-avoidance conflict, can be particularly perplexing. Here, a single option presents both positive and negative characteristics that must be carefully assessed. This kind of conflict creates an internal struggle as the person is drawn to the benefits while simultaneously deterred by the drawbacks.

For instance, think about the opportunity to take a high-paying job that requires relocating to a city where you have no friends or family. The lucrative salary is appealing (approach), but the prospect of isolation and starting anew is intimidating (avoidance). In such cases,

• It’s important to balance the pros and cons
• Visualize the possible outcomes
• Consider seeking advice from others

Resolving an approach-avoidance conflict often requires deep introspection and sometimes a willingness to embrace change or take risks.