Chapter 9: Problem 3
When we reason from general statements of what is known to specific conclusions, we are engaging in a. hypothesis testing. b. inductive reasoning. c. deductive reasoning. d. logic.
Short Answer
Expert verified
The answer is c, deductive reasoning.
Step by step solution
01
Understanding the Question
The question is asking us about the process of reaching a specific conclusion starting from general statements that are known to be true. We are provided with four options to choose from.
02
Option Analysis
Evaluate each option:
a. Hypothesis testing: This involves making predictions or forming a hypothesis and testing it through experiments or observations to draw conclusions.
b. Inductive reasoning: This process involves moving from specific observations to broader generalizations.
c. Deductive reasoning: This method involves starting with a general statement or hypothesis and examining the possibilities to reach a specific, logical conclusion.
d. Logic: This is the overall science of reasoning, encompassing both inductive and deductive reasoning.
03
Recognizing Deductive Reasoning
Focus on the process described in the exercise, which is reasoning from general statements (general truths or principles) to reach specific conclusions. This matches the definition of deductive reasoning, where conclusions are derived logically from premises assumed to be true.
04
Selecting the Correct Answer
Based on the analysis in previous steps, option c, deductive reasoning, involves reasoning from general statements to specific conclusions. Therefore, the answer to this exercise is option c, deductive reasoning.
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Inductive Reasoning
Inductive reasoning is an approach where you start with specific observations and work your way towards broader generalizations or theories. It's like piecing together a puzzle when you only have a few pieces to begin with. For example, if you observe that the sun has risen in the east every day of your life, you might inductively conclude that the sun always rises in the east. This does not guarantee absolute certainty, but rather suggests that it is highly likely to be true based on your observations.
Inductive reasoning is common in scientific discovery, where scientists gather data from experiments and create theories that explain their findings. Although inductive reasoning can lead us to form strong predictions and theories, it relies heavily on the extent of our observations and data. As a result, there is always room for exceptions, which makes it less robust than deductive reasoning, where conclusions must be true if the premises are true.
In summary, inductive reasoning moves from specific to general and is essential in forming hypotheses, unlike deductive reasoning which begins with a general premise.
Inductive reasoning is common in scientific discovery, where scientists gather data from experiments and create theories that explain their findings. Although inductive reasoning can lead us to form strong predictions and theories, it relies heavily on the extent of our observations and data. As a result, there is always room for exceptions, which makes it less robust than deductive reasoning, where conclusions must be true if the premises are true.
In summary, inductive reasoning moves from specific to general and is essential in forming hypotheses, unlike deductive reasoning which begins with a general premise.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental concept in statistics and scientific research. It involves formulating a hypothesis, which is a testable prediction, and then using data to determine whether to accept or reject this hypothesis. This approach is critical in research for validating theories or assessing the effectiveness of interventions.
In a typical hypothesis testing scenario, you'll establish a null hypothesis (usually representing a neutral statement or the status quo) and an alternative hypothesis (what you aim to support). You then collect data through experiments or observations and use statistical analysis to reach a conclusion.
For instance, if you're testing a new medication, your null hypothesis might state that the medication has no effect, while your alternative hypothesis might suggest that it has a positive effect. Through experimentation and analysis, you'll determine whether the observed effects are statistically significant, thus leading you to either reject or not reject your null hypothesis.
In a typical hypothesis testing scenario, you'll establish a null hypothesis (usually representing a neutral statement or the status quo) and an alternative hypothesis (what you aim to support). You then collect data through experiments or observations and use statistical analysis to reach a conclusion.
For instance, if you're testing a new medication, your null hypothesis might state that the medication has no effect, while your alternative hypothesis might suggest that it has a positive effect. Through experimentation and analysis, you'll determine whether the observed effects are statistically significant, thus leading you to either reject or not reject your null hypothesis.
- Null Hypothesis (H0): Assumes no effect or change.
- Alternative Hypothesis (H1): Represents the effect you're testing for.
- Statistical Significance: Determines likelihood that results are due to chance.
Logic
Logic is the foundational tool that helps us think through problems systematically and make reasoned conclusions. It's the backbone of both inductive and deductive reasoning and is crucial in our daily decision-making processes. When engaging with logic, we utilize a set of accepted principles to connect ideas in a coherent manner, ensuring that our conclusions logically follow from the information we have.
Logic involves understanding relationships between facts, statements, and overall structures, often relying on rules and valid arguments. It is divided into different forms:
Logic involves understanding relationships between facts, statements, and overall structures, often relying on rules and valid arguments. It is divided into different forms:
- Deductive Logic: Begins with general principles and foresees specific results. If the starting premises are accurate, the conclusion reached is also accurate.
- Inductive Logic: Begins with observations and generalizes patterns or theories from specific data.