Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In the scientific method, a hypothesis is a(n) _______ a. observation b. measurement c. test d. proposed explanation

Short Answer

Expert verified
The correct answer is d. 'Proposed explanation'.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Term in Context

The term 'Hypothesis' should be examined in the context of the scientific method. A hypothesis is a proposed explanation based on limited evidence, which serves as a starting point for further investigation and is designed to be tested.
02

Compare Options with Definition

Here the proposed definitions of 'Hypothesis' are compared to the actual meaning. 'Observations' and 'measurements' are parts of the scientific method process, but they are not hypotheses. 'Tests' are the methods to validate or invalidate hypotheses, but they are not the hypothesis themselves.
03

Choose the Correct Option

From the comparisons made in step 2, it is clear that the definition in option d, 'proposed explanation', accurately describes what a hypothesis is within the scope of the scientific method.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Scientific Method
The scientific method is a systematic approach used by scientists to explore and understand phenomena. It ensures that findings are grounded in evidence and empirical data. The process typically involves several key steps:
  • Observation: The first step, where phenomena and patterns are observed in the natural world.
  • Question: Formulating questions about what has been observed.
  • Hypothesis: Proposing a potential explanation that addresses the questions posed.
  • Experiment: Designing and conducting tests to validate or challenge the hypothesis.
  • Analysis: Examining the data collected during the experiments.
  • Conclusion: Drawing conclusions based on the data analysis.
Each step is crucial as it builds upon the previous one, making the scientific method a cyclical and iterative process. By using this method, researchers ensure their results are repeatable and reliable, fostering a deeper understanding of how the world functions.
Proposed Explanation
A proposed explanation, commonly known as a hypothesis, is a fundamental component of the scientific method. It acts as a starting point that guides the direction of scientific inquiry. When scientists craft a hypothesis, they are essentially proposing a possible answer to a specific question. This explanation must be testable and falsifiable. This means that there must be a way to verify it through experimental data, and it must be possible to prove it wrong if it does not hold up under scrutiny.

Hypotheses are generally formed based on observations and prior knowledge. They are not just guesses, but informed assumptions made with the intent of extending scientific understanding. Once formulated, the hypothesis serves as a guide for designing experiments and collecting data. Successful hypotheses can eventually lead to theories if they consistently withstand extensive testing and validation.
Testing Hypotheses
Testing hypotheses is a critical step in the scientific method that involves conducting experiments or other forms of data collection to evaluate the validity of the proposed explanation. This stage is essential because it allows researchers to determine whether their hypothesis is supported by empirical evidence. The process of testing often includes:
  • Designing experiments with controlled variables, ensuring that the testing conditions are as unbiased as possible.
  • Collecting data systematically to minimize errors and bias.
  • Analyzing the results to see if they align with the predictions made by the hypothesis.
Once testing is complete, scientists will consider whether the results support or refute the hypothesis. If the data does not support the hypothesis, it may be rejected or revised. However, if results consistently back up the hypothesis, it may be further scrutinized and possibly contribute to broader scientific theories. This step is what makes science dynamic and self-correcting, as hypotheses can be continuously tested and re-evaluated.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which of the following concepts is most integral to Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic theory? (A) trephining (B) structuralism (C) the unconscious mind (D) the concept of Gestalt (E) behaviorism

Why do you think psychology courses like this one are often requirements of so many different programs of study?

In Milgram's controversial study on obedience, nearly _____ of the participants were willing to administer what appeared to be lethal electrical shocks to another person because they were told to do so by an authority figure. a. \(1 / 3\) b. \(2 / 3\) c. \(3 / 4\) d. \(4 / 5\)

Symbolic dream analysis might be an important research technique to a psychologist from which of the following perspectives? (A) behaviorist (B) biopsychologist (C) psychoanalytic (D) evolutionary (E) structuralist

In what way might a behaviorist disagree with a cognitive psychologist about the cause of aggression? (A) A behaviorist might state that aggression is caused by memories or ways we think about aggressive behavior, while a cognitive psychologist might say aggression is caused by a past repressed experience. (B) A behaviorist might state that aggression is a behavior encouraged by our genetic code, while a cognitive psychologist might state that aggression is caused by memories or ways we think about aggressive behavior. (C) A behaviorist might state that aggression is caused by past rewards for aggressive behavior, while a cognitive psychologist might believe aggression is caused by an expressed desire to fulfill certain life needs. (D) A behaviorist might state that aggression is caused by past rewards for aggressive behavior, while a cognitive psychologist might believe aggression is caused by memories or ways we think about aggressive behavior. (E) A behaviorist would not disagree with a cognitive psychologist about aggression because they both believe that aggressive behavior is caused by the way we cognitively process certain behaviors.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Psychology Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free