Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Does the decay process \(n \rightarrow p+\pi^{-}\) violate any conservation rules?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The decay process \(n \rightarrow p+\pi^{-}\) violates mass-energy conservation.

Step by step solution

01

Identify particles involved in the decay process

First, we need to identify the particles involved in the decay process, \(n \rightarrow p+\pi^{-}\), and their properties. In this case, we have a neutron (n) decaying into a proton (p) and a negatively-charged pion (\(\pi^{-}\)).
02

Determine properties for each particle

We need to determine the mass-energy, charge, spin, and baryon number for each particle. - Neutron (n): Mass-energy = 939.6 MeV, charge = 0, spin = 1/2, baryon number = 1 - Proton (p): Mass-energy = 938.3 MeV, charge = +1, spin = 1/2, baryon number = 1 - Negatively charged pion (\(\pi^{-}\)): Mass-energy = 139.6 MeV, charge = -1, spin = 0, baryon number = 0
03

Check charge conservation

Charge conservation states that the total charge before and after the decay process should be the same. In this case, we have: Charge Before Decay: Neutron charge = 0 Charge After Decay: Proton charge + Pion charge = (+1) + (-1) = 0 Since the total charge before and after the decay is the same, this decay process conserves charge.
04

Check spin conservation

Spin conservation states that the total spin quantum number before and after the decay process should be the same. In this case, we have: Spin Before Decay: Neutron spin = 1/2 Spin After Decay: Proton spin + Pion spin = (1/2) + 0 = 1/2 Since the total spin before and after the decay is the same, this decay process conserves spin.
05

Check mass-energy conservation

Mass-energy conservation states that the total mass-energy before and after the decay process should be the same. In this case, we have: Mass-energy Before Decay: Neutron mass-energy = 939.6 MeV Mass-energy After Decay: Proton mass-energy + Pion mass-energy = 938.3 MeV + 139.6 MeV = 1077.9 MeV Since the total mass-energy before and after the decay is not the same, this decay process does not conserve mass-energy.
06

Check baryon number conservation

Baryon number conservation states that the total baryon number before and after the decay process should be the same. In this case, we have: Baryon Number Before Decay: Neutron baryon number = 1 Baryon Number After Decay: Proton baryon number + Pion baryon number = 1 + 0 = 1 Since the total baryon number before and after the decay is the same, this decay process conserves baryon number.
07

Conclusion

The decay process \(n \rightarrow p+\pi^{-}\) conserves charge, spin, and baryon number. However, it does not conserve mass-energy. Therefore, this decay process violates mass-energy conservation and is not allowed.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Would neutron scattering or electromagnetic wave scattering (using X-rays or light) be more appropriate for investigating the scattering cross section of an atom as a whole? Which would be more appropriate for investigating the cross section of a nucleus of an atom? Which result will depend on \(Z\), the atomic number?

Consider a hypothetical force mediated by the exchange of bosons that have the same mass as protons. Approximately what would be the maximum range of such a force? You may assume that the total energy of these particles is simply the rest-mass energy and that they travel close to the speed of light. If you do not make these assumptions and instead use the relativistic expression for total energy, what happens to your estimate of the maximum range of the force?

At about what kinetic energy is the length scale probed by an \(\alpha\) particle no longer calculated by the classical formula but rather by the relativistic formula? a) \(0.3 \mathrm{GeV}\) b) \(0.03 \mathrm{GeV}\) c) \(3 \mathrm{GeV}\) d) \(30 \mathrm{GeV}\)

The fundamental observation underlying the Big Bang theory of cosmology is Edwin Hubble's 1929 discovery that the arrangement of galaxies throughout space is expanding. Like the photons of the cosmic microwave background, the light from distant galaxies is stretched to longer wavelengths by the expansion of the universe. This is not a Doppler shift: Except for their local motions around each other, the galaxies are essentially at rest in space; it is space itself that expands. The ratio of the wavelength of light received at Earth from a galaxy, \(\lambda_{\text {rec }}\), to its wavelength at emission, \(\lambda_{\text {emit }}\), is equal to the ratio of the scale factor (radius of curvature) \(a\) of the universe at reception to its value at emission. The redshift, \(z\), of the light-which is what Hubble could measure \(-\) is defined by \(1+z=\lambda_{\text {rec }} / \lambda_{\text {emit }}=a_{\text {rec }} / a_{\text {emit }}\). a) Hubble's Law states that the redshift, \(z\), of light from a galaxy is proportional to the galaxy's distance from Earth (for reasonably nearby galaxies): \(z \cong c^{-1} H \Delta s,\) where \(c\) is the vacuum speed of light, \(H\) is the Hubble constant, and \(\Delta s\) is the distance of the galaxy from Earth. Derive this law from the relationships described in the problem statement, and determine the Hubble constant in terms of the scale- factor function \(a(t)\). b) If the Hubble constant currently has the value \(H_{0}=72(\mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}) / \mathrm{Mpc},\) how far away is a galaxy whose light has the redshift \(z=0.10 ?\) (The megaparsec \((\mathrm{Mpc})\) is a unit of length equal to \(3.26 \cdot 10^{6}\) light-years. For comparison, the Great Nebula in Andromeda is approximately 0.60 Mpc from Earth.)

In a positron annihilation experiment, positrons are directed toward a metal. What are we likely to observe in such an experiment, and how might it provide information about the momentum of electrons in the metal?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free