Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a one-dimensional collision at relativistic speeds between two particles with masses \(m_{1}\) and \(m_{2}\). Particle 1 is initially moving with a speed of \(0.700 c\) and collides with particle \(2,\) which is initially at rest. After the collision, particle 1 recoils with a speed of \(0.500 c\), while particle 2 starts moving with a speed of \(0.200 c\). What is the ratio \(m_{2} / m_{1} ?\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The ratio of mass m2 to mass m1 is 4.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate initial and final momenta

In this step, we need to calculate the initial and final momenta for both particles. Since \(m_1\) and \(m_2\) are unknowns, we will express the momenta in terms of their masses and velocities only. Initial momenta: - For particle 1: \(p_{1i} = \gamma_{1i} m_{1} v_{1i}\) - For particle 2: \(p_{2i} = \gamma_{2i} m_{2} v_{2i}\) (particle 2 is at rest, so \(v_{2i}=0\) and \(p_{2i}=0\)) Final momenta: - For particle 1: \(p_{1f} = \gamma_{1f} m_{1} v_{1f}\) - For particle 2: \(p_{2f} = \gamma_{2f} m_{2} v_{2f}\)
02

Write the conservation of momentum equation

Using the conservation of momentum principle, we can write the following equation: \(p_{1i} + p_{2i} = p_{1f} + p_{2f}\) Now we can substitute the momenta expressions obtained in step 1: \(\gamma_{1i} m_{1} v_{1i} = \gamma_{1f} m_{1} v_{1f} + \gamma_{2f} m_{2} v_{2f}\)
03

Solve the equation for \(\frac{m_2}{m_1}\)

To solve this equation for \(\frac{m_2}{m_1}\), we can first divide both sides of the equation by \(m_1v_{1i}\): \(\gamma_{1i} = \frac{\gamma_{1f}v_{1f}}{v_{1i}} + \frac{\gamma_{2f}m_{2}v_{2f}}{m_1v_{1i}}\) Next, we can isolate the term with \(\frac{m_2}{m_1}\): \(\frac{m_2}{m_1} = \frac{\gamma_{1i}v_{1i} - \gamma_{1f}v_{1f}}{\gamma_{2f}v_{2f}}\) Now, we can substitute the velocities and calculate the relativistic factors: \(\gamma_{1i} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{(0.7c)^2}{c^2}}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-0.49}} = 2\) \(\gamma_{1f} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{(0.5c)^2}{c^2}}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-0.25}} = \frac{4}{3}\) \(\gamma_{2f} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{(0.2c)^2}{c^2}}} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-0.04}} = \frac{5}{3}\) Finally, substitute the values of the relativistic factors and velocities into the ratio equation: \(\frac{m_2}{m_1} = \frac{2\cdot0.7c - \frac{4}{3}\cdot0.5c}{\frac{5}{3}\cdot0.2c} = \frac{(1.4 - \frac{4}{3}\cdot0.5)c}{\frac{1}{3}c} = \frac{(1.4 - \frac{2}{3})c}{\frac{1}{3}c} = 4\) The ratio \(\frac{m_2}{m_1}\) is equal to 4.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

One-Dimensional Collision
In physics, when we speak of a one-dimensional collision, we're describing a scenario where two particles interact along a single straight line. This type of collision allows for a simplified analysis since it reduces the variables to a minimum, focusing purely on the linear motion.

During a one-dimensional collision, two key quantities are often of interest: the velocities of the particles and their masses. It is also important to clarify whether the collision is elastic or inelastic, as this will affect how energy is conserved during the event. However, regardless of the collision's nature, the total momentum along the line of motion must be conserved.

The problem provided illustrates a one-dimensional collision at relativistic speeds between two particles. When dealing with such high velocities (significant fractions of the speed of light), we must rely on relativistic mechanics to accurately describe the motion, as classical mechanics would lead to incorrect results.
Relativistic Speeds
At relativistic speeds, close to the speed of light (denoted by the symbol c), the standard Newtonian mechanics learned at school begins to break down. Instead, we use Einstein's theory of relativity to analyse motion.

One crucial concept from this theory is the relativistic factor, Gamma (γ), which is given by the equation \( \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}} \), where v is the velocity of the particle. As the velocity increases towards the speed of light, gamma increases, which has significant implications for momentum and energy.

For example, at relativistic speeds, simple addition and subtraction of velocities no longer apply. Instead, velocities combine through a more complex formula, and momentum increases disproportionately, becoming significantly greater than the classical calculation \( p = mv \). The inclusion of the relativistic factor in the momentum calculation ensures that our description of the motion remains accurate at high velocities, as shown in the exercise solution.
Conservation of Momentum in Relativity
Momentum conservation is a foundational concept in both classical and relativistic physics. It states that the total momentum of a closed system remains constant if no external forces are acting upon it. However, in the realm of relativistic speeds, we must consider the relativistic momentum defined by \( p = \gamma mv \).

In our problem, we apply the conservation of momentum principle to a relativistic one-dimensional collision. To do so, we calculate the initial and final momentum for each particle, taking into account their respective relativistic factors. This allows us to set up an equation representing momentum conservation throughout the collision.

It's important to note that while the velocities and momenta are subject to relativistic effects, the conservation laws themselves are not altered by the high speeds. This enduring principle provides a crucial link between the familiar physics of everyday experiences and the less intuitive physics governing ultra-fast particles.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In some proton accelerators, proton beams are directed toward each other to produce head-on collisions. Suppose that in such an accelerator, protons move with a speed relative to the lab reference frame of \(0.9972 c\) a) Calculate the speed of approach of one proton with respect to another one with which it is about to collide head on. Express your answer as a multiple of \(c\), using six significant figures. b) What is the kinetic energy of each proton (in units of MeV) in the laboratory reference frame? c) What is the kinetic energy of one of the colliding protons (in units of \(\mathrm{MeV}\) ) in the rest frame of the other proton?

Show that \(E^{2}-p^{2} c^{2}=E^{2}-p^{\prime 2} c^{2},\) that is, that \(E^{2}-p^{2} c^{2}\) is a Lorentz invariant. (Hint: Look at Derivation 35.4 , which shows that the space-time interval is a Lorentz invariant.)

What is the value of \(\gamma\) for a particle moving at a speed of \(0.800 c ?\)

In a high-speed football game, a running back traveling at \(55.0 \%\) of the speed of light relative to the field throws the ball to a receiver running in the same direction at \(65.0 \%\) of the speed of light relative to the field. The speed of the ball relative to the running back is \(80.0 \%\) of the speed of light. a) How fast does the receiver perceive the speed of the ball to be? b) If the running back shines a flashlight at the receiver, how fast will the photons appear to be traveling to the receiver?

An astronaut in a spaceship flying toward Earth's Equator at half the speed of light observes Earth to be an oblong solid, wider and taller than it appears deep, rotating around its long axis. A second astronaut flying toward Earth's North Pole at half the speed of light observes Earth to be a similar shape but rotating about its short axis. Why does this not present a contradiction?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free