Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Determine the minimum thickness of a soap film \((n=1.32)\) that would produce constructive interference when illuminated by light of wavelength \(550 . \mathrm{nm}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The minimum thickness of the soap film is 208 nanometers.

Step by step solution

01

Write down the formula for constructive interference in thin films

The condition for constructive interference in thin films can be expressed by the formula: \(2 \cdot t \cdot n= m\lambda\) Where: - \(t\) is the thickness of the soap film - \(n\) is the refractive index of the soap film - \(m\) is an integer representing the order of interference (\(0\) for minimum thickness, \(1\) for next minimum thickness, and so on) - \(\lambda\) is the wavelength of the light source
02

Convert wavelength into meters

The wavelength should be in meters to match the units for thickness. The given wavelength is \(550\) nm. You can convert nm to meters by multiplying it by \(10^{-9}\) meters: \(\lambda = 550 \cdot 10^{-9} \mathrm{m} \)
03

Find the minimum thickness by plugging in the values in the formula

Since we're interested in the minimum thickness, let's find the thickness for the \(m=0\) case: \(2 \cdot t \cdot 1.32 = 0 \cdot (550 \cdot 10^{-9})\) \(t = \frac{0 \cdot (550 \cdot 10^{-9})}{2 \cdot 1.32}\) \(t = 0\) The thickness for the \(m=0\) case turns out to be \(0\) which is not a meaningful solution for existence of soap film. So we need to move on to the next case, which is \(m = 1\).
04

Find the thickness for the next minimum case, m = 1

Now let's find the thickness for the \(m=1\) case: \(2 \cdot t \cdot 1.32 = 1 \cdot (550 \cdot 10^{-9})\) \(t = \frac{1 \cdot (550 \cdot 10^{-9})}{2 \cdot 1.32}\) \(t = \frac{550 \cdot 10^{-9}}{2 \cdot 1.32}\) \(t = 2.08 \cdot 10^{-7} \mathrm{m}\)
05

Express the result in nanometers

To express the thickness in nanometers, multiply it by \(10^9\): \(t_{nm} = 2.08 \cdot 10^{-7} \cdot 10^9\) \(t_{nm} = 208 \mathrm{nm}\) The minimum thickness of the soap film that would produce constructive interference is \(208\) nanometers.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Thin Film Interference
Imagine you blow a soap bubble and notice the array of colors painting its surface. This is a beautiful example of thin film interference, a phenomenon that occurs when light waves reflected off the top surface of a thin film, like the bubble, combine with waves that have travelled through and reflected off the bottom surface.

Understanding this requires a basic appreciation of how waves superimpose. When the crest of one wave aligns with the crest of another, they add up to create a brighter, or more intense, light. This is called constructive interference, and it's precisely what's happening to generate those vibrant hues in soap films. Otherwise, if the crest of one wave aligns with the trough of another, they cancel each other out, causing destructive interference—resulting in places where the film appears darker.

In our exercise, the task is to find the minimum thickness of a film that would lead to constructive interference, specifically for light of a certain wavelength. The appropriate interference pattern is critical, as it determines how much light is reflected versus how much is transmitted, influencing the visible color or brightness.
Optical Path Difference
To grasp how thin film interference works, let's dissect a key term: optical path difference (OPD). This is the difference in the path lengths that light takes when reflecting off different layers within a material. In thin films, OPD can result in different types of interference depending on the thickness of the film and the wavelength of light.

In mathematical terms, OPD is calculated based on the refractive index of the film multiplied by its thickness, accounting for the extra distance the wave travels inside the film compared to the air. If the OPD is an integer multiple of the wavelength, it leads to constructive interference, while a half-integer multiple typically results in destructive interference.

The exercise provided perfectly illustrates OPD. When light of a specific wavelength strikes a soap film, the waves that reflect off the top interface are out of phase with those reflecting from the bottom. By finding when this path difference equals a multiple of the wavelength, we can determine when constructive interference will occur, and this helps us to measure the minimum thickness of the soap film.
Soap Film Interference
Soap film interference might appear simple at first glance but forms a fundamental part of optics. The vibrant patterns we see on soap bubbles are due to varying film thicknesses, cause a spectrum of colors due to interference effects. Here's how we apply our knowledge practically as shown in the exercise solution.

By applying the interference formula and considering light of 550 nm wavelength (a part of the visible spectrum), we find out how thin a film needs to be for it to amplify this light via constructive interference. It's worth noting that the 'm' in our formula represents different 'orders' of thickness that could work, similar to musical notes in chord strings resonating at fundamental frequencies and their harmonics.

The 'zero-order' (m=0) does not apply as it suggests a film of zero thickness, which isn't practical. The first order, however, gives us a meaningful value: a film thickness that precisely meets the condition for constructive interference for the given wavelength. In this case, it's 208 nm for the first order, and that would appear as a specific color depending on the viewing angle, illuminating the mystery behind the bubble's shimmering facade.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Think of the pupil of your eye as a circular aperture \(5.00 \mathrm{~mm}\) in diameter. Assume you are viewing light of wavelength \(550 . \mathrm{nm},\) to which your eyes are maximally sensitive. a) What is the minimum angular separation at which you can distinguish two stars? b) What is the maximum distance at which you can distinguish the two headlights of a car mounted \(1.50 \mathrm{~m}\) apart?

How many slits per centimeter must a grating have if there are to be no second-order maxima or minima for any visible wavelength \((400 .-700 . \mathrm{nm}) ?\)

Suppose the distance between the slits in a double-slit experiment is \(2.00 \cdot 10^{-5} \mathrm{~m}\). A beam of light with a wavelength of \(750 \mathrm{nm}\) is shone on the slits. What is the angular separation between the central maximum and an adjacent maximum? a) \(5.00 \cdot 10^{-2} \mathrm{rad}\) c) \(3.75 \cdot 10^{-2} \mathrm{rad}\) b) \(4.50 \cdot 10^{-2} \mathrm{rad}\) d) \(2.50 \cdot 10^{-2} \mathrm{rad}\)

In a double-slit experiment, the slits are \(2.49 \cdot 10^{-5} \mathrm{~m}\) apart. If light of wavelength \(477 \mathrm{nm}\) passes through the slits, what will be the distance between the third-order and fourth-order bright fringes on a screen \(1.23 \mathrm{~m}\) away?

A 5.000-cm-wide diffraction grating with 200 slits is used to resolve two closely spaced lines (a doublet) in a spectrum. The doublet consists of two wavelengths, \(\lambda_{\mathrm{a}}=629.8 \mathrm{nm}\) and \(\lambda_{\mathrm{b}}=630.2 \mathrm{nm} .\) The light illuminates the entire grating at normal incidence. Calculate to four significant digits the angles \(\theta_{1 \mathrm{a}}\) and \(\theta_{\mathrm{lb}}\) with respect to the normal at which the first-order diffracted beams for the two wavelengths, \(\lambda_{\mathrm{a}}\) and \(\lambda_{\mathrm{b}}\), respectively, will be reflected from the grating. Note that this is not \(0^{\circ} !\) What order of diffraction is required to resolve these two lines using this grating?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free