Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Determine the minimum amount of energy that a projectile of mass \(100.0 \mathrm{~kg}\) must gain to reach a circular orbit \(10.00 \mathrm{~km}\) above the Earth's surface if launched from (a) the North Pole or (b) the Equator (keep answers to four significant figures). Do not be concerned about the direction of the launch or of the final orbit. Is there an advantage or disadvantage to launching from the Equator? If so, how significant is the difference? Do not neglect the rotation of the Earth when calculating the initial energies. Use \(5.974 \cdot 10^{24} \mathrm{~kg}\) for the mass of the Earth and \(6357 \mathrm{~km}\) as the radius of the Earth.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Determine the minimum amount of energy needed for a projectile of mass 100 kg to reach a circular orbit 10.0 km above the Earth's surface, taking into account the projectile is launched from the North Pole and the Equator. Discuss the advantage or disadvantage of launching from the Equator.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the initial energies

First, let's convert the distances to meters: R = 6357 km * 1000 = 6,357,000 m and h = 10,000 m. For the North Pole, the initial velocity \(v_{NP}\) of the projectile is assumed to be zero since there is no rotation in this case. Thus, the initial kinetic energy \(K_{NP}\) is also zero. For the Equator, the initial velocity of the projectile is equal to Earth's rotational velocity at the surface \(v_{EQ}\). We need to find the angular velocity \(\omega\) and calculate the linear velocity of the projectile as \(v_{EQ} = \omega R\). Earth makes a full rotation in 24 hours, which means \(\omega = \frac{2 \pi}{24 \cdot 60 \cdot 60} s^{-1}\). Now, we can calculate the initial kinetic energy \(K_{EQ}\) as \(K_{EQ} = \frac{1}{2} m v_{EQ}^2\).
02

Find gravitational potential energies

We need to find the gravitational potential energy at the Earth's surface and at the final orbit. For the Earth's surface, it is \(U_{0} = -\frac{GMm}{R}\). For the final orbit, it is \(U_{f} = -\frac{GMm}{R + h}\).
03

Determine the energy required

The energy required to reach a circular orbit from the North Pole is \(\Delta E_{NP} = (U_{f} + K_{f}) - (U_{0} + K_{NP})\), where \(K_{f} = \frac{1}{2} m v_{f}^2\) and \(v_{f} = \sqrt{\frac{GM}{R + h}}\). Similarly, the energy required to reach a circular orbit from the Equator is \(\Delta E_{EQ} = (U_{f} + K_{f}) - (U_{0} + K_{EQ})\).
04

Compare the energies and discuss

Now, let's compare the minimum energy required to reach a circular orbit when launched from the North Pole and the Equator: 1. Calculate the difference between required energies: \(\Delta E = \Delta E_{EQ} - \Delta E_{NP}\). 2. Discuss the advantage or disadvantage of launching from the Equator and the significance of the difference. After this step-by-step solution, you should be able to determine the minimum energy required for a projectile to reach a circular orbit above Earth, both from the North Pole and the Equator, and analyze the advantages or disadvantages of launching from the Equator.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Three asteroids, located at points \(P_{1}, P_{2}\), and \(P_{3}\), which are not in a line, and having known masses \(m_{1}, m_{2}\), and \(m_{3}\), interact with one another through their mutual gravitational forces only; they are isolated in space and do not interact with any other bodies. Let \(\sigma\) denote the axis going through the center of mass of the three asteroids, perpendicular to the triangle \(P_{1} P_{2} P_{3}\). What conditions should the angular velocity \(\omega\) of the system (around the axis \(\sigma\) ) and the distances $$ P_{1} P_{2}=a_{12}, \quad P_{2} P_{3}=a_{23}, \quad P_{1} P_{3}=a_{13}, $$ fulfill to allow the shape and size of the triangle \(P_{1} P_{2} P_{3}\) to remain unchanged during the motion of the system? That is, under what conditions does the system rotate around the axis \(\sigma\) as a rigid body?

Careful measurements of local variations in the acceleration due to gravity can reveal the locations of oil deposits. Assume that the Earth is a uniform sphere of radius \(6370 \mathrm{~km}\) and density \(5500 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3},\) except that there is a spherical region of radius \(1.00 \mathrm{~km}\) and density \(900 . \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3},\) whose center is at a depth of \(2.00 \mathrm{~km}\). Suppose you are standing on the surface of the Earth directly above the anomaly with an instrument capable of measuring the acceleration due to gravity with great precision. What is the fractional deviation of the acceleration due to gravity that you measure compared to what you would have measured had the density been \(5500 . \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\) everywhere? (Hint: Think of this as a superposition problem involving two uniform spherical masses, one with a negative density.

Even though the Moon does not have an atmosphere, the trajectory of a projectile near its surface is only approximately a parabola. This is because the acceleration due to gravity near the surface of the Moon is only approximately constant. Describe as precisely as you can the actual shape of a projectile's path on the Moon, even one that travels a long distance over the surface of the Moon.

Is the orbital speed of the Earth when it is closest to the Sun greater than, less than, or equal to the orbital speed when it is farthest from the Sun? Explain.

A scientist working for a space agency has noticed that a Russian satellite of mass \(250 . \mathrm{kg}\) is on collision course with an American satellite of mass \(600 .\) kg orbiting at \(1000 . \mathrm{km}\) above the surface. Both satellites are moving in circular orbits but in opposite directions. If the two satellites collide and stick together, will they continue to orbit or crash to the Earth? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free