Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The wave functions for a particle in a box (see Fig. 40.12a) are zero at certain points. Does this mean that the particle can’t move past one of these points? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

No, it is not possible expect that particle move past one of these points or not.

Step by step solution

01

Max born interpretation of wave function

According to Max born interpretation of wave function, the square of the wave function of particle is proportional to the probability of probability of finding a particle at a certain points.

02

Position and trajectory of particle in quantum system

There are no definite trajectories of particle So, it is not possible to predict particle’s location in anywhere quantum system like in classical mechanics.

It is the act of measurement that causes the wave function of particle to collapse and provide a definite location.

03

Conclusion      

As, there is no definite trajectory exit for particle in quantum system it is possible to expect that particle cross these points or not.

Hence, it is not possible expect that particle move past one of these points or not.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Example 43.9 (Section 43.4), the activity of atmospheric carbon before 1900was given. Discuss why this activity may have changed since1900.

What do you think would be different in everyday life if the speed of light were 10 m/s instead of 3.00×108m/s

In Fig. 40.12b, the probability function is zero at the points x= 0 and x= L, the “walls” of the box. Does this mean that the particle never strikes the walls? Explain.

You are standing on a train platform watching a high-speed train pass by. A light inside one of the train cars is turned on and then a little later it is turned off. (a) Who can measure the proper time interval for the duration of the light: you or a passenger on the train? (b) Who can measure the proper length of the train car: you or a passenger on the train? (c) Who can measure the proper length of a sign attached to a post on the train platform: you or a passenger on the train? In each case explain your answer.

In an experiment involving the photoelectric effect, if the intensity of the incident light (having frequency higher than the threshold frequency) is reduced by a factor of 10 without changing anything else, which (if any) of the following statements about this process will be true? (a) The number of photoelectrons will most likely be reduced by a factor of 10. (b) The maximum kinetic energy of the ejected photoelectrons will most likely be reduced by a factor of 10. (c) The maximum speed of the ejected photoelectrons will most likely be reduced by a factor of 10. (d) The maximum speed of the ejected photoelectrons will most likely be reduced by a factor of 110. (e) The time for the first photoelectron to be ejected will be increased by a factor of 10.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free