Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Because electric field lines and equipotential surfaces are always perpendicular, two equipotential surfaces can never cross; if they did, the direction of E would be ambiguous at the crossing points. Yet two equipotential surfaces appear to cross at the centre of Fig. 23.23c. Explain why there is no ambiguity about the direction of Ein this particular case.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The total energy is equal to zero, then there is no ambiguity about the direction of the total electric energy in this particular case

Step by step solution

01

About electric field lines 

Electric field lines are an excellent way of visualising electric fields. They were first introduced by Michael Faraday himself. A field line is drawn tangential to the net at a point. Thus at any point, the tangent to the electric field line matches the direction of the electric field at that point.

02

Determine why there is no ambiguity about the direction of E in this particular case

As We know the electric energy due to a point charge is given by

Calculation:

In order to evaluate the total electric energy, we use the following relation

Therefore the total energy is equal to zero, then there is no ambiguity about the direction of the total electric energy in this particular case

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A 1.50-mcylindrical rod of diameter 0.500cmis connected to

a power supply that maintains a constant potential difference of 15.0Vacross

its ends, while an ammeter measures the current through it. You observe that

at room temperature (20.0C)the ammeter reads 18.5Awhile at 92.0Cit

reads 17.2A. You can ignore any thermal expansion of the rod. Find (a) the

resistivity at and (b) the temperature coefficient of resistivity at for the material of the rod.

In the circuit shown in Fig. E25.30, the 16.0-V battery is removed and reinserted with the opposite polarity, so that its negative terminal is now next to point a. Find (a) the current in the circuit (magnitude anddirection); (b) the terminal voltage Vbaof the 16.0-V battery; (c) the potential difference Vacof point awith respect to point c. (d) Graph the potential rises and drops in this circuit (see Fig. 25.20).

An open plastic soda bottle with an opening diameter of 2.5cmis placed on a table. A uniform 1.75-Tmagnetic field directed upward and oriented25° from the vertical encompasses the bottle. What is the total magnetic flux through the plastic of the soda bottle?

In the circuit shown in Fig. E26.47 each capacitor initially has a charge of magnitude 3.50 nC on its plates. After the switch S is closed, what will be the current in the circuit at the instant that the capacitors have lost 80.0% of their initial stored energy?

We have seen that a coulomb is an enormous amount of charge; it is virtually impossible to place a charge of 1 C on an object. Yet, a current of 10A,10C/sis quite reasonable. Explain this apparent discrepancy.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free