Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A fan blade rotates with angular velocity given by \(\omega_z\)(\(t\)) \(= \gamma - \beta t^2\), where \(\gamma =\) 5.00 rad/s and \(\beta =\) 0.800 rad/s\(^3\). (a) Calculate the angular acceleration as a function of time. (b) Calculate the instantaneous angular acceleration \(\alpha_z\) at \(t =\) 3.00 s and the average angular acceleration \(\alpha_{av-z}\) for the time interval \(t =\) 0 to \(t =\) 3.00 s. How do these two quantities compare? If they are different, why?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Instantaneous acceleration is -4.80 rad/s²; average is -0.733 rad/s². The difference is because instantaneous measures a specific point, while average is over an interval.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Angular Velocity Function

The angular velocity is given as \(\omega_z(t) = \gamma - \beta t^2\). We know \(\gamma = 5.00\) rad/s and \(\beta = 0.800\) rad/s\(^3\). We will use this equation to find angular acceleration.
02

Finding Angular Acceleration Function

Angular acceleration \(\alpha_z(t)\) is the derivative of angular velocity with respect to time \(t\). Thus, we differentiate \(\omega_z(t)\): \[\alpha_z(t) = \frac{d}{dt}(\gamma - \beta t^2) = 0 - 2\beta t = -2\beta t.\] Plugging in the value of \(\beta\), we get \[\alpha_z(t) = -2(0.800)t = -1.60t.\]
03

Evaluating Instantaneous Angular Acceleration at t = 3.00s

Substitute \(t = 3.00\) seconds into the angular acceleration function \[\alpha_z(3) = -1.60 \times 3.00 = -4.80\text{ rad/s}^2.\]
04

Calculating Average Angular Acceleration for Interval 0 to 3s

The average angular acceleration \(\alpha_{av-z}\) over a time interval is the change in angular velocity divided by the time interval duration. Firstly, evaluate \(\omega_z(0)\) and \(\omega_z(3)\):\[\omega_z(0) = \gamma - \beta (0)^2 = 5.00 \text{ rad/s},\]\[\omega_z(3) = \gamma - \beta (3)^2 = 5.00 - 0.800 \times 9 = 2.80 \text{ rad/s}.\]Then, calculate \(\alpha_{av-z}\):\[\alpha_{av-z} = \frac{\omega_z(3) - \omega_z(0)}{3 - 0} = \frac{2.80 - 5.00}{3} = -0.733\overline{3} \text{ rad/s}^2.\]
05

Comparing Instantaneous and Average Angular Acceleration

The instantaneous angular acceleration at \(t = 3.00\) seconds is \(-4.80 \text{ rad/s}^2\), whereas the average angular acceleration over the interval from \(t = 0\) to \(t = 3.00\) seconds is \(-0.733\overline{3} \text{ rad/s}^2\). These values are different because instantaneous acceleration is calculated at a specific moment, while average acceleration considers the entire interval, smoothing out changes over time.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

angular velocity
Angular velocity refers to how quickly an object rotates or revolves around a point or axis. It's like speed but for rotation. In the context of circular motion, angular velocity, often denoted as \( \omega \), measures how much an angle changes over a certain period, typically in radians per second (rad/s). In our exercise, the angular velocity of the fan blade is expressed mathematically as \( \omega_z(t) = \gamma - \beta t^2 \). This shows that the angular velocity changes with time due to the subtraction of \( \beta t^2 \) from \( \gamma \), the initial constant velocity.
  • \( \gamma \) acts as a starting point or initial angular velocity.
  • \( \beta t^2 \) represents the deceleration factor depending on time \( t \).
A negative \( \beta t^2 \) indicates that over time, the fan blade's rotation slows down because \( \beta \) increases as \( t \) increases, reducing \( \omega \). This results in a changing rate of spin, which is further analyzed when exploring angular acceleration.
instantaneous acceleration
Instantaneous acceleration is a snapshot of how fast the rate of angular velocity is changing at a specific point in time. Unlike average acceleration, which considers changes over a period, instantaneous acceleration focuses on a particular moment.To find this rate of change for the fan blade, we take the derivative of the angular velocity function. For our exercise, the angular velocity function is given by \( \omega_z(t) = \gamma - \beta t^2 \). When we differentiate this, we are essentially finding the instantaneous angular acceleration \( \alpha_z(t) \) such that:\[\alpha_z(t) = \frac{d}{dt} (\gamma - \beta t^2) = -2\beta t.\]At \( t = 3.00 \) seconds, this gives us a specific numerical value for \( \alpha_z \), calculated as \( \alpha_z(3) = -4.80 \text{ rad/s}^2 \). This reveals precisely how fast the angular velocity of the fan blade is changing at that very second. Remember, this is an instantaneous measure, meaning it's for that one exact point in time.
average acceleration
Average acceleration offers a broader view of how angular velocity changes over a given time span. It's the overall change smoothened out over the time interval. In the exercise, the average angular acceleration from \( t = 0 \) to \( t = 3 \) seconds is computed using the angular velocities at these two times.The formula used here is:\[\alpha_{av-z} = \frac{\omega_z(3) - \omega_z(0)}{3 - 0}.\]By substituting in the values previously calculated for \( \omega_z(3) = 2.80 \text{ rad/s} \) and \( \omega_z(0) = 5.00 \text{ rad/s} \), we find the average angular acceleration to be \( -0.733\overline{3} \text{ rad/s}^2 \). This result helps understand the fan's performance across that interval. Unlike instantaneous acceleration, average acceleration does not tell us about changes at any specific instant, but rather how changes are spread out across time. This means smooth fluctuations in the angular velocity are interpreted as one constant rate of change, making it easier to understand long-term behavior.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How I Scales. If we multiply all the design dimensions of an object by a scaling factor \(f\), its volume and mass will be multiplied by \(f ^3\). (a) By what factor will its moment of inertia be multiplied? (b) If a \(\frac{1}{48}\)-scale model has a rotational kinetic energy of 2.5 J, what will be the kinetic energy for the full-scale object of the same material rotating at the same angular velocity?

It has been argued that power plants should make use of off-peak hours (such as late at night) to generate mechanical energy and store it until it is needed during peak load times, such as the middle of the day. One suggestion has been to store the energy in large flywheels spinning on nearly frictionless ball bearings. Consider a flywheel made of iron (density 7800 kg/m\(^3\)) in the shape of a 10.0-cm-thick uniform disk. (a) What would the diameter of such a disk need to be if it is to store 10.0 megajoules of kinetic energy when spinning at 90.0 rpm about an axis perpendicular to the disk at its center? (b) What would be the centripetal acceleration of a point on its rim when spinning at this rate?

If a person of mass \(M\) simply moved forward with speed \(V\), his kinetic energy would be \\( \frac{1}{2} \\)\(MV^2\). However, in addition to possessing a forward motion, various parts of his body (such as the arms and legs) undergo rotation. Therefore, his total kinetic energy is the sum of the energy from his forward motion plus the rotational kinetic energy of his arms and legs. The purpose of this problem is to see how much this rotational motion contributes to the person's kinetic energy. Biomedical measurements show that the arms and hands together typically make up 13% of a person's mass, while the legs and feet together account for 37%. For a rough (but reasonable) calculation, we can model the arms and legs as thin uniform bars pivoting about the shoulder and hip, respectively. In a brisk walk, the arms and legs each move through an angle of about \(\pm30^\circ\) (a total of 60\(^\circ\)) from the vertical in approximately 1 second. Assume that they are held straight, rather than being bent, which is not quite true. Consider a 75-kg person walking at 5.0 km/h, having arms 70 cm long and legs 90 cm long. (a) What is the average angular velocity of his arms and legs? (b) Using the average angular velocity from part (a), calculate the amount of rotational kinetic energy in this person's arms and legs as he walks. (c) What is the total kinetic energy due to both his forward motion and his rotation? (d) What percentage of his kinetic energy is due to the rotation of his legs and arms?

Small blocks, each with mass \(m\), are clamped at the ends and at the center of a rod of length \(L\) and negligible mass. Compute the moment of inertia of the system about an axis perpendicular to the rod and passing through (a) the center of the rod and (b) a point one-fourth of the length from one end.

An advertisement claims that a centrifuge takes up only \(0.127 \mathrm{~m}\) of bench space but can produce a radial acceleration of \(3000 \mathrm{~g}\) at 5000 rev \(/ \mathrm{min}\). Calculate the required radius of the centrifuge. Is the claim realistic?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free