Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In an industrial accident a 65-kg person receives a lethal whole-body equivalent dose of 5.4 Sv from x rays. (a) What is the equivalent dose in rem? (b) What is the absorbed dose in rad? (c) What is the total energy absorbed by the person's body? How does this amount of energy compare to the amount of energy required to raise the temperature of 65 kg of water 0.010 C\(^{\circ}\)?

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) 540 rem; (b) 540 rad; (c) Total energy absorbed: 351 J, more than 272 J needed to heat water.

Step by step solution

01

Convert Sievert to Rem

1 Sievert (Sv) is equal to 100 rem. Therefore, to convert the dose from sieverts to rem, you can multiply the dose in sieverts by 100.\[ 5.4 \, \text{Sv} \times 100 = 540 \, \text{rem} \]
02

Calculate Absorbed Dose in Rad

The absorbed dose in rad can be calculated by knowing that the relationship between the equivalent dose (in rem) and absorbed dose (in rad) involves the quality factor, which for x-rays is 1. Thus, 1 Sv = 100 rad. We then convert 5.4 Sv into the absorbed dose in rad.\[ 5.4 \, \text{Sv} = 540 \, \text{rem} = 540 \, \text{rad} \]
03

Calculate Total Energy Absorbed

The energy absorbed is calculated using the absorbed dose.We use the fact that 1 rad = 0.01 J/kg.Thus, total energy absorbed by the body is:\[ \text{Energy} = 540 \, \text{rad} \times 0.01 \, \text{J/kg} \times 65 \, \text{kg} = 351 \, \text{J} \]
04

Compare to Energy Required for Water Temperature Increase

The energy required to increase the temperature of 65 kg of water by 0.010 °C is calculated using the specific heat capacity of water (4.186 J/g°C). For 65 kg:\[ \text{Energy} = 65,000 \, \text{g} \times 4.186 \, \text{J/g°C} \times 0.010 \, \text{°C} = 272 \, \text{J} \]Comparing 351 J to 272 J, the energy absorbed by the person is slightly more than the energy required to increase the temperature of water by 0.010 °C.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Equivalent Dose
The equivalent dose is a measurement used to assess the risk of radiation exposure to human health. It considers not just the amount of energy absorbed by a person, but also the biological impact of the type of radiation involved.
  • Measured in Sieverts (Sv) or rem.
  • Different types of radiation have varying effects on tissue, so each type has a different "quality factor" to account for its relative impact.
To convert from Sieverts to rem, a multiplication factor of 100 is used. For example, converting a dose of 5.4 Sv to rem involves multiplying by 100, yielding 540 rem. This conversion is essential to ensure all different types of radiation exposures can be compared on the same scale.
Having a consistent unit helps healthcare and safety professionals assess potential biological damage accurately.
Absorbed Dose
The absorbed dose is a key concept in understanding how much radiation energy is actually absorbed by an object or person. Unlike equivalent dose, it does not account for the type of radiation.
  • Measured in rad (radiation absorbed dose) or Grays (Gy).
  • 1 rad is equivalent to 0.01 joules per kilogram of body weight.
The absorbed dose provides a more straightforward picture of radiation impact without factoring in the biological effect. In our scenario, an absorbed dose of 540 rad is equivalent to the calculated dosage received by the person. Since the quality factor for X-rays is 1, the absorbed dose directly mirrors the equivalent dose in this case.
Energy Comparison
Comparing energy levels helps in understanding radiation effects and other thermal processes. The absorbed energy from radiation can be surprisingly small when compared to everyday thermal energy. We calculated that the energy absorbed by the person was 351 J. This energy absorption value can then be compared to other processes, such as heating water. For example, the energy needed to increase the temperature of 65 kg of water by 0.010 °C is 272 J.
  • The energy absorbed in our example was 351 J.
  • Meanwhile, the energy for heating water was 272 J.
From this comparison, it can be noted that the energy absorbed by the body is higher, illustrating that while the absolute energy might be small, its biological implications are significant.
Specific Heat Capacity
Specific heat capacity is an important concept in understanding how substances absorb heat. It is defined as the amount of energy required to raise the temperature of 1 gram of a substance by 1°C.
  • Water has a high specific heat capacity of 4.186 J/g°C.
  • This means water requires a relatively large amount of energy to change its temperature.
In practical scenarios, this property of water has significant implications. For example, the energy needed to heat 65 kg of water by a mere 0.010 °C is 272 J. This high specific heat capacity has practical benefits, making water an excellent coolant in many industrial applications and also explaining its thermal buffering effects in nature.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The polonium isotope \(^{210}_{84}Po\) has atomic mass 209.982874 u. Other atomic masses are \(^{206}_{82}Pb\), 205.974465 u; \(^{209}_{83}Bi\), 208.980399 u; \(^{210}_{83}Bi\), 209.984120 u; \(^{209}_{84}Po\), 208.982430 u; and \(^{210}_{85}At\), 209.987148 u. (a) Show that the alpha decay of \(^{210}_{84}Po\) is energetically possible, and find the energy of the emitted a particle. (b) Is \(^{210}_{84}Po\) energetically stable with respect to emission of a proton? Why or why not? (c) Is \(^{210}_{84}Po\) energetically stable with respect to emission of a neutron? Why or why not? (d) Is \(^{210}_{84}Po\) energetically stable with respect to \(\beta$$^-\) decay? Why or why not? (e) Is \(^{210}_{84}Po\)energetically stable with respect to \(\beta$$^+\) decay? Why or why not?

The atomic mass of \(^{25}_{12}Mg\) is 24.985837 u, and the atomic mass of \(^{25}_{13}Al\) is 24.990428 u. (a) Which of these nuclei will decay into the other? (b) What type of decay will occur? Explain how you determined this. (c) How much energy (in MeV) is released in the decay?

The unstable isotope \(^4$$^0\)K is used for dating rock samples. Its half-life is 1.28 \(\times\) 10\(^9\) y. (a) How many decays occur per second in a sample containing 1.63 \(\times\) 10\(^-$$^6\) g of \(^4$$^0\)K? (b) What is the activity of the sample in curies?

Radioactive isotopes used in cancer therapy have a "shelf-life," like pharmaceuticals used in chemotherapy. Just after it has been manufactured in a nuclear reactor, the activity of a sample of \(^6$$^0\)Co is 5000 Ci. When its activity falls below 3500 Ci, it is considered too weak a source to use in treatment. You work in the radiology department of a large hospital. One of these \(^6$$^0\)Co sources in your inventory was manufactured on October 6, 2011. It is now April 6, 2014. Is the source still usable? The half-life of \(^6$$^0\)Co is 5.271 years.

Consider the fusion reaction \(^{2}_{1}H\) + \(^{2}_{1}H \rightarrow ^{3}_{2}He + ^{1}_{0}n\). (a) Estimate the barrier energy by calculating the repulsive electrostatic potential energy of the two \(^{2}_{1}H\) nuclei when they touch. (b) Compute the energy liberated in this reaction in MeV and in joules. (c) Compute the energy liberated \(per\) \(mole\) of deuterium, remembering that the gas is diatomic, and compare with the heat of combustion of hydrogen, about \(2.9 \times 10^{5} J/mol\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free