Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What is the de Broglie wavelength of a red blood cell, with mass 1.00 \(\times\) 10\(^{-11}\) g, that is moving with a speed of 0.400 cm/s? Do we need to be concerned with the wave nature of the blood cells when we describe the flow of blood in the body?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The de Broglie wavelength is \(1.66 \times 10^{-17}\) m; it's too small to affect blood flow.

Step by step solution

01

Convert Units

First, we need to convert the mass of the red blood cell from grams to kilograms and the speed from centimeters per second to meters per second, as these are the standard units used in physics. Mass: \[1.00 \times 10^{-11} \text{ g} = 1.00 \times 10^{-14} \text{ kg}\]Speed: \[0.400 \text{ cm/s} = 0.004 \text{ m/s}\]
02

Use de Broglie Wavelength Formula

The de Broglie wavelength \(\lambda\) is given by the formula:\[\lambda = \frac{h}{mv}\]where:- \(h\) is the Planck constant \(6.626 \times 10^{-34}\) J·s- \(m\) is the mass in kilograms- \(v\) is the velocity in meters per second.
03

Calculate de Broglie Wavelength

Substitute the values into the de Broglie wavelength formula:\[\lambda = \frac{6.626 \times 10^{-34} \text{ J·s}}{1.00 \times 10^{-14} \text{ kg} \times 0.004 \text{ m/s}}\]Calculate:\[\lambda = \frac{6.626 \times 10^{-34}}{4.00 \times 10^{-17}} = 1.66 \times 10^{-17} \text{ m}\]
04

Interpret the Result

The calculated de Broglie wavelength is \(1.66 \times 10^{-17}\) m, which is extremely small compared to the size of a red blood cell, which is typically around \(6 \times 10^{-6}\) m. This means the wave nature of the red blood cell is negligible in the context of describing blood flow in the body.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Wave Nature
The concept of wave nature in particles, including red blood cells, stems from the de Broglie hypothesis. It proposes that all matter exhibits wave-like properties, not just light. This means that everything, from tiny electrons to larger objects like blood cells, has an associated wavelength, known as the de Broglie wavelength. However, this wave nature becomes significant primarily in microscopic particles.

For everyday, macroscopic objects, the wavelength is so tiny that it's practically nonexistent in comparison to the object's size. Therefore, when considering red blood cells or similar biological particles, their wave nature doesn't notably impact their behavior or flow. Since red blood cells in the bloodstream are quite large compared to their minuscule de Broglie wavelength, the wave nature can typically be ignored when examining blood flow.

Understanding this helps explain why quantum mechanics rarely needs to be applied to biological systems at the level of red blood cells. Their physical size and the de Broglie wavelength difference make their quantum effects negligible in the biological processes they are part of.
Planck Constant
The Planck constant is a fundamental constant in physics that plays a crucial role in the study of quantum mechanics. Its value is approximately \(6.626 \times 10^{-34}\) Joule-seconds. This constant is incredibly tiny, making it a bridge between the particle and wave nature of matter. In the de Broglie wavelength formula, the Planck constant facilitates transforming momentum into wavelength, giving insight into how properties typically associated with waves, like wavelength, can apply to particles.

When calculating the de Broglie wavelength of a red blood cell, the Planck constant helps determine whether its wave nature matters in practical scenarios, such as in the flow of blood. Because the constant is so small, objects with larger mass and slower speeds result in nearly infinitesimal wavelengths, which explains why even though matter has wave properties, they are generally not observed in larger objects.

The Planck constant is one of the keystones of quantum physics, highlighting how classical mechanics gives way to quantum mechanics at microscopic scales. It serves as a reminder that while the quantum effects are fascinating, they often remain imperceptible in the everyday world of larger bodies, like human cells.
Blood Flow
Blood flow within the human body is a complicated and critical process, governed by principles of fluid dynamics rather than quantum mechanics. In the context of larger biological structures, such as organs and blood vessels, classical physics provides an accurate and straightforward description. Red blood cells are carried along in the bloodstream due to pressures and forces within the circulatory system which ensures oxygen and nutrients are efficiently distributed throughout the body.

The wave nature of individual red blood cells, while interesting from a theoretical perspective, does not have a noticeable effect on the way blood moves. When calculated, the de Broglie wavelength of such cells turns out to be incredibly small compared to their physical size, confirming that their behavior in the bloodstream is more accurately described by classical physics principles.

Therefore, while quantum mechanics offers profound insights into the nature of matter at microscopic levels, it plays little role in macroscopic processes like blood flow. The movement of blood is mostly determined by factors like heart rate, blood pressure, and the geometry of blood vessels, rendering the quantum wave nature irrelevant in practical medical diagnostics and treatments.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The radii of atomic nuclei are of the order of 5.0 \(\times\) 10\(^{-15}\) m. (a) Estimate the minimum uncertainty in the momentum of an electron if it is confined within a nucleus. (b) Take this uncertainty in momentum to be an estimate of the magnitude of the momentum. Use the relativistic relationship between energy and momentum, Eq. (37.39), to obtain an estimate of the kinetic energy of an electron confined within a nucleus. (c) Compare the energy calculated in part (b) to the magnitude of the Coulomb potential energy of a proton and an electron separated by 5.0 \(\times\) 10\(^{-15}\) m. On the basis of your result, could there be electrons within the nucleus? (\(Note\): It is interesting to compare this result to that of Problem 39.72.)

A CD-ROM is used instead of a crystal in an electrondiffraction experiment. The surface of the CD-ROM has tracks of tiny pits with a uniform spacing of 1.60 \(\mu{m}\). (a) If the speed of the electrons is 1.26 \(\times\) 10\(^4\) m/s, at which values of \(\theta\) will the \(m\) = 1 and \(m\) = 2 intensity maxima appear? (b) The scattered electrons in these maxima strike at normal incidence a piece of photographic film that is 50.0 cm from the CD-ROM. What is the spacing on the film between these maxima?

Why is it easier to use helium ions rather than neutral helium atoms in such a microscope? (a) Helium atoms are not electrically charged, and only electrically charged particles have wave properties. (b) Helium atoms form molecules, which are too large to have wave properties. (c) Neutral helium atoms are more difficult to focus with electric and magnetic fields. (d) Helium atoms have much larger mass than helium ions do and thus are more difficult to accelerate.

A beam of electrons is accelerated from rest and then passes through a pair of identical thin slits that are 1.25 nm apart. You observe that the first double-slit interference dark fringe occurs at \(\pm\)18.0\(^\circ\) from the original direction of the beam when viewed on a distant screen. (a) Are these electrons relativistic? How do you know? (b) Through what potential difference were the electrons accelerated?

How many photons per second are emitted by a 7.50-mW CO\(_2\) laser that has a wavelength of 10.6 \(\mu\)m?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free