Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The light from an iron arc includes many different wavelengths. Two of these are at \(\lambda\) = 587.9782 nm and \(\lambda\) = 587.8002 nm. You wish to resolve these spectral lines in first order using a grating 1.20 cm in length. What minimum number of slits per centimeter must the grating have?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The grating must have at least 2755 slits per centimeter.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem

We need to resolve two spectral lines using a diffraction grating. Resolving power (R) of a grating helps to distinguish between close wavelengths. The formula for resolving power is \( R = \frac{\lambda}{\Delta \lambda} = mN \), where \( m \) is the order of the spectrum, \( N \) is the total number of slits, \( \lambda \) is one of the wavelengths, and \( \Delta \lambda \) is the difference in wavelengths.
02

Calculate Wavelength Difference

Identify the two wavelengths given: \( \lambda_1 = 587.9782 \) nm and \( \lambda_2 = 587.8002 \) nm. Calculate their difference: \( \Delta \lambda = \lambda_1 - \lambda_2 = 587.9782 - 587.8002 = 0.178 \) nm.
03

Set Up the Resolving Power Equation

We want to resolve these lines in first order, so \( m = 1 \). Substitute into the resolving power formula: \( R = \frac{587.9782}{0.178} = mN \), which simplifies to \( 587.9782 = N(0.178) \).
04

Solve for Total Number of Slits (N)

Calculate \( N \), the total number of slits: \( N = \frac{0.178}{0.178} \approx 3304.37 \). To resolve the lines, \( N \) must be an integer, so \( N = 3305 \).
05

Calculate Slits per Centimeter

The grating is 1.20 cm in length. Calculate the minimum number of slits per centimeter (d): \( d = \frac{N}{1.20} = \frac{3305}{1.20} \approx 2754.17 \) slits/cm.
06

Conclusion

Round up the value of slits per centimeter to ensure resolution: The grating must have a minimum of 2755 slits/cm.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Resolving Power
The resolving power of a diffraction grating is a measure of its ability to separate closely spaced spectral lines, such as those produced by light passing through a slit. It is an essential concept in optics that can be understood through a simple formula:
  • \( R = \frac{\lambda}{\Delta \lambda} = mN \)
In this equation, \( R \) represents the resolving power, \( \lambda \) is the wavelength of light, \( \Delta \lambda \) is the smallest difference in wavelength that can be resolved, \( m \) is the order of the spectrum, and \( N \) is the total number of slits within the grating.
Resolving power is crucial in applications such as spectroscopy, where distinguishing between different substances relies on measuring specific wavelengths of light. The greater the resolving power, the more precise the separation of wavelengths. In practical terms, a higher \( N \) or using higher orders \( m \) can help increase the resolving power of the grating.
Wavelength Difference
The wavelength difference, symbolized as \( \Delta \lambda \), is the distinction in measurements between two close wavelengths. In the context of diffraction gratings and the exercise at hand, identifying \( \Delta \lambda \) is key to solving the problem of spectral line resolution.
For the given problem, the wavelengths are \( \lambda_1 = 587.9782 \) nm and \( \lambda_2 = 587.8002 \) nm. Calculating the difference involves subtracting these values:
  • \( \Delta \lambda = \lambda_1 - \lambda_2 = 0.178 \) nm
This small difference exemplifies how closely spaced spectral lines can be and why a precise resolving power is crucial for identification. When this value is plugged into the resolving power formula, it helps determine whether the grating can effectively distinguish between these two given wavelengths.
Spectral Lines
Spectral lines are unique lines that represent specific wavelengths of light emitted or absorbed by substances. They act like optical fingerprints for different elements, helping scientists and engineers identify the composition of an object.
These lines originate from electron transitions within atoms or molecules. When electrons jump between energy levels, they emit or absorb light with characteristic wavelengths.
In the given exercise, the task is to resolve two spectral lines with wavelengths of \( 587.9782 \) nm and \( 587.8002 \) nm. Due to their closeness in wavelength, high resolving power is required from the diffraction grating. Accurately resolving these lines allows us to differentiate between similar elements or compounds, providing valuable insights in areas such as astronomy and chemical analysis.
Slits Per Centimeter
The concept of slits per centimeter describes how many slits are present within a single centimeter length of a diffraction grating. This measurement is crucial as it directly affects the grating's resolving power. The more slits packed into a given length, the higher its ability to separate close spectral lines.
For instance, in the original exercise, resolving power determines the number of slits necessary to discern two close wavelengths. The total number of slits \( N \) calculated was around 3305, and the grating had a length of 1.20 cm. Thus, finding the slits per centimeter involves:
  • \( d = \frac{N}{1.20} \approx 2754.17 \) slits/cm
To ensure resolution, we round up to 2755 slits/cm. This high density of slits maximizes the grating's resolving capability, making it suitable for tasks like resolving closely spaced spectral lines.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Monochromatic light of wavelength 580 nm passes through a single slit and the diffraction pattern is observed on a screen. Both the source and screen are far enough from the slit for Fraunhofer diffraction to apply. (a) If the first diffraction minima are at \(\pm\)90.0\(^\circ\), so the central maximum completely fills the screen, what is the width of the slit? (b) For the width of the slit as calculated in part (a), what is the ratio of the intensity at \(\theta\) = 45.0\(^\circ\) to the intensity at \(\theta\) = 0?

A diffraction grating has 650 slits>mm. What is the highest order that contains the entire visible spectrum? (The wavelength range of the visible spectrum is approximately 380-750 nm.)

A thin slit illuminated by light of frequency \(f\) produces its first dark band at \(\pm\)38.2\(^\circ\) in air. When the entire apparatus (slit, screen, and space in between) is immersed in an unknown transparent liquid, the slit's first dark bands occur instead at \(\pm\)21.6\(^\circ\). Find the refractive index of the liquid.

A slit \(0.240 \mathrm{~mm}\) wide is illuminated by parallel light rays of wavelength \(540 \mathrm{nm} .\) The diffraction pattern is observed on a screen that is \(3.00 \mathrm{~m}\) from the slit. The intensity at the center of the central maximum \(\left(\theta=0^{\circ}\right)\) is \(6.00 \times 10^{-6} \mathrm{W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\). (a) What is the distance on the screen from the center of the central maximum to the first minimum? (b) What is the intensity at a point on the screen midway between the center of the central maximum and the first minimum?

(a) Consider an arrangement of \(N\) slits with a distance \(d\) between adjacent slits. The slits emit coherently and in phase at wavelength \(\lambda\). Show that at a time \(t\), the electric field at a distant point \(P\) is $$E_P(t) = E_0 cos(kR - \omega t) + E_0 cos(kR - \omega t + \phi)$$ $$+ E_0 cos(kR - \omega t + 2\phi) + . . .$$ $$+ E_0 cos(kR - \omega t + (N - 1)\phi)$$ where \(E_0\) is the amplitude at \(P\) of the electric field due to an individual slit, \(\phi = (2\pi d\) sin \(\theta)/\lambda\), \(\theta\) is the angle of the rays reaching \(P\) (as measured from the perpendicular bisector of the slit arrangement), and \(R\) is the distance from \(P\) to the most distant slit. In this problem, assume that \(R\) is much larger than \(d\). (b) To carry out the sum in part (a), it is convenient to use the complex-number relationship \(e^{iz} = cos z + i \space sin \space z\), where \(i = \sqrt{-1}\). In this expression, cos \(z\) is the \(real\) \(part\) of the complex number \(e^{iz}\), and sin \(z\) is its \(imaginary\) \(part\). Show that the electric field \(E_P(t)\) is equal to the real part of the complex quantity $$\sum _{n=0} ^{N-1} E_0 e^{i(kR-\omega t+n\phi)}$$ (c) Using the properties of the exponential function that \(e^Ae^B = e^{(A+B)}\) and \((e^A)^n = e^{nA}\), show that the sum in part (b) can be written as $$E_0 ( {e^{iN\phi} - 1 \over e^{i\phi} - 1} )e^{i(kR-\omega t)}$$ $$= E_0 ({e^{iN\phi/2} - e^{-iN\phi/2} \over e^{i\phi/2} - e^{-i\phi/2}} )e^{i[kR-\omega t+(N-1)\phi/2]}$$ Then, using the relationship \(e^{iz}\) = cos \(z\) + \(i\) sin \(z\), show that the (real) electric field at point \(P\) is $$E_P(t) = [E_0 {sin(N\phi/2) \over sin(\phi/2)} ] cos [kR - \omega t + (N - 1)\phi/2]$$ The quantity in the first square brackets in this expression is the amplitude of the electric field at \(P\). (d) Use the result for the electric-field amplitude in part (c) to show that the intensity at an angle \(\theta\) is $$I = I_0 [{ sin(N\phi/2) \over sin(\phi/2) }] ^2$$ where \(I_0\) is the maximum intensity for an individual slit. (e) Check the result in part (d) for the case \(N\) = 2. It will help to recall that sin 2\(A\) = 2 sin \(A\) cos \(A\). Explain why your result differs from Eq. (35.10), the expression for the intensity in two-source interference, by a factor of 4. (\(Hint\): Is I0 defined in the same way in both expressions?)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free