Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

An astronaut in a spaceship flying toward Earth's Equator at half the speed of light observes Earth to be an oblong solid, wider and taller than it appears deep, rotating around its long axis. A second astronaut flying toward Earth's North Pole at half the speed of light observes Earth to be a similar shape but rotating about its short axis. Why does this not present a contradiction?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Short Answer: The scenario does not present a contradiction because the two astronauts' observations are influenced by the special theory of relativity, particularly length contraction and the relativity of simultaneity. These relativistic effects cause each astronaut to perceive Earth's shape and rotations differently due to their direction and relative velocity. The observations are valid in their respective reference frames and transform consistently between frames, maintaining the coherence of physical laws.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the problem and the frame of reference of each astronaut

First, it is essential to grasp that when two objects are moving relative to one another, the observations made by an observer in one reference frame will not necessarily coincide with observations made by an observer in another reference frame. In this case, we have two astronauts viewing Earth from different directions, while moving at half the speed of light (c/2) relative to the Earth. These observations exhibit the principles of the special theory of relativity.
02

Recalling the Lorentz transformation

To understand why there is no contradiction in this scenario, we must recall the Lorentz transformation, which describes how coordinates of an observation in one frame of reference (space and time) will transform into coordinates in another reference frame. When an observer is moving with velocity v relative to another observer, the length, time, and mass all are transformed due to the special theory of relativity. The Lorentz transformation equations include: x' = \gamma(x-vt) t' = \gamma(t-\frac{vx}{c^2}) where x and t are the spatial and temporal coordinates in one frame, x' and t' are the coordinates in the other frame, v is the relative velocity between two frames, and \gamma is the Lorentz factor given by \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}.
03

Apply length contraction and relativity of simultaneity concepts

Due to length contraction, astronauts observe Earth's shape as oblong and more extensive along the direction of motion; this is because when an object moves relative to an observer at a large speed compared to the speed of light, its length in the direction of motion contracts (apparently gets shorter) as observed by that observer. The contraction factor is given by the Lorentz factor \gamma. Furthermore, the relativity of simultaneity affects the observation of Earth's rotation; events simultaneous in one frame might not be simultaneous in another frame.
04

Comparing the two observations

Although both astronauts observe Earth as oblong, their observations differ in how Earth rotates around its axes. Due to the relativity of simultaneity and the Lorentz transformation, the events observed by the two astronauts do not present a contradiction. The astronauts' different frames of reference cause them to perceive the events taking place on Earth differently. Their observations are valid in their respective reference frames and are transformed consistently between frames, maintaining the coherence of the physical laws.
05

Conclusion

In conclusion, the scenario does not present a contradiction as the observations made by the two astronauts are influenced by the special theory of relativity, and, in particular, length contraction and the relativity of simultaneity. These relativistic effects change the perception of Earth's shape and rotations for each astronaut, depending on their direction and relative velocity. This exercise exemplifies the idea that physical laws should appear the same regardless of the reference frame and that the events observed might transform accordingly.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a positively charged particle moving at constant speed parallel to a current-carrying wire, in the direction of the current. As you know (after studying Chapters 27 and 28), the particle is attracted to the wire by the magnetic force due to the current. Now suppose another observer moves along with the particle, so according to him the particle is at rest. Of course, a particle at rest feels no magnetic force. Does that observer see the particle attracted to the wire or not? How can that be? (Either answer seems to lead to a contradiction: If the particle is attracted, it must be by an electric force because there is no magnetic force, but there is no electric field from a neutral wire; if the particle is not attracted, you see that the particle is, in fact, moving toward the wire.)

In the twin paradox example, Alice boards a spaceship that flies to a space station 3.25 light-years away and then returns with a speed of \(0.650 c .\) This can be viewed in terms of Alice's reference frame. a) Show that Alice must travel with a speed of \(0.914 c\) to establish a relative speed of \(0.650 c\) with respect to Earth when Alice is returning back to Earth. b) Calculate the time duration for Alice's return flight toward Earth with the aforementioned speed.

A square of area \(100 \mathrm{~m}^{2}\) that is at rest in the reference frame is moving with a speed \((\sqrt{3} / 2) c\). Which of the following statements is incorrect? a) \(\beta=\sqrt{3} / 2\) b) \(\gamma=2\) c) To an observer at rest, it looks like another square with an area less than \(100 \mathrm{~m}^{2}\) d) The length along the moving direction is contracted by a factor of \(\frac{1}{2}\)

A gravitational lens should produce a halo effect and not arcs. Given that the light travels not only to the right and left of the intervening massive object but also to the top and bottom, why do we typically see only arcs?

At rest, a rocket has an overall length of \(L .\) A garage at rest (built for the rocket by the lowest bidder) is only \(L / 2\) in length. Luckily, the garage has both a front door and a back door, so that when the rocket flies at a speed of \(v=0.866 c\), the rocket fits entirely into the garage. However, according to the rocket pilot, the rocket has length \(L\) and the garage has length \(L / 4\). How does the rocket pilot observe that the rocket does not fit into the garage?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free