Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A gravitational lens should produce a halo effect and not arcs. Given that the light travels not only to the right and left of the intervening massive object but also to the top and bottom, why do we typically see only arcs?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: We typically observe arcs in gravitational lensing images rather than complete halos because the alignment between the source, the intervening massive object, and the observer is usually imperfect and asymmetrical. This imperfect alignment favors the formation of partial segments of Einstein rings (arcs) rather than perfectly formed circular halos. Furthermore, the light paths from the top and bottom may also contribute to arc formation, but their visibility might be limited by various factors such as the lensing geometry, the source's brightness, and the mass distribution of the massive object.

Step by step solution

01

Understand gravitational lensing

Gravitational lensing is a phenomenon where the path of light is bent as it passes through the gravitational field of a massive object. This bending of light causes the light from a distant source to arrive at an observer from different angles, creating multiple images or distorted images of the source.
02

Visualize the light paths around a massive object

Imagine a massive object, like a galaxy or a black hole, situated between a distant light source and an observer. The light emitted by the source will travel in all directions. When the light passes close to the massive object, its path is bent due to the object's gravitational field.
03

Geometry of the arcs

The shape of the resulting images depends on the geometry of the lensing system, including the alignment between the source, the intervening massive object, and the observer. When the light paths are perfectly symmetrical around the massive object, we would expect to see a complete circle, known as an "Einstein ring." However, in most cases, the alignment is not perfect, and the light paths are more prominent in some directions than others.
04

Explain why arcs are more common than complete halos

Typically, we observe arcs rather than complete halos due to the relative alignment of the source, the massive object, and the observer. The likelihood of a perfectly symmetrical alignment is very low, making Einstein rings relatively rare. Instead, the geometry generally favors arcs, which are partial segments of the idealized Einstein ring. Additionally, any deviation from perfect symmetry can lead to a distortion of the images along a particular axis, either horizontally or vertically, causing the formation of arcs rather than a full halo.
05

Light paths from the top and bottom

The light paths coming from the top and bottom of the intervening massive object are indeed also bent by the gravitational field. However, these light paths may not necessarily lead to the formation of observable arcs. Factors such as the specific lensing geometry, the brightness of the source, and the spatial distribution of the massive object's mass can contribute to the dominance of the arcs observed in one direction over the other. In some cases, arcs may be present, but too faint to be detected easily. In conclusion, the main reason why we typically see arcs instead of complete halos in gravitational lensing situations is due to the imperfect alignment and asymmetrical geometry of the source, massive object, and observer in most lensing systems. This imperfect alignment favors the formation of partial segments of Einstein rings (arcs) rather than perfectly formed circular halos. Additionally, light paths from the top and bottom may also contribute to arc formation, but their visibility might be limited by various factors.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In your physics class you have just learned about the relativistic frequency shift, and you decide to amaze your friends at a party. You tell them that once you drove through a stop light and that when you were pulled over you did not get ticketed because you explained to the police officer that the relativistic Doppler shift made the red light of wavelength \(650 \mathrm{nm}\) appear green to you, with a wavelength of \(520 \mathrm{nm}\). If your story had been true, how fast would you have been traveling?

Consider two clocks carried by observers in a reference frame moving at speed \(v\) in the positive \(x\) -direction relative to ours. Assume that the two reference frames have parallel axes, and that their origins coincide when clocks at that point in both frames read zero. Suppose the clocks are separated by distance \(l\) in the \(x^{\prime}-\) direction in their own reference frame; for instance, \(x^{\prime}=0\) for one clock and \(x^{\prime}=I\) for the other, with \(y^{\prime}=z^{\prime}=0\) for both. Determine the readings \(t^{\prime}\) on both clocks as functions of the time coordinate \(t\) in our reference frame.

Consider motion in one spatial dimension. For any velocity \(v,\) define parameter \(\theta\) via the relation \(v=c \tanh \theta\) where \(c\) is the vacuum speed of light. This quantity is variously called the velocity parameter or the rapidity corresponding to velocity \(v\). a) Prove that for two velocities, which add according to the Lorentzian rule, the corresponding velocity parameters simply add algebraically, that is, like Galilean velocities. b) Consider two reference frames in motion at speed \(v\) in the \(x\) -direction relative to one another, with axes parallel and origins coinciding when clocks at the origin in both frames read zero. Write the Lorentz transformation between the two coordinate systems entirely in terms of the velocity parameter corresponding to \(v\), and the coordinates.

Suppose you are explaining the theory of relativity to a friend, and you have told him that nothing can go faster than \(300,000 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}\). He says that is obviously false: Suppose a spaceship traveling past you at \(200,000 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}\), which is perfectly possible according to what you are saying, fires a torpedo straight ahead whose speed is \(200,000 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}\) relative to the spaceship, which is also perfectly possible; then, he says, the torpedo's speed is \(400,000 \mathrm{~km} / \mathrm{s}\). How would you answer him?

Two twins, \(A\) and \(B\), are in deep space on similar rockets traveling in opposite directions with a relative speed of \(c / 4\). After a while, twin A turns around and travels back toward twin \(\mathrm{B}\) again, so that their relative speed is \(c / 4\). When they meet again, is one twin younger, and if so which twin is younger? a) Twin A is younger. d) Each twin thinks b) Twin \(B\) is younger. the other is younger. c) The twins are the same age.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free