Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

What would be the consequence of setting the potential at \(+100 \mathrm{~V}\) at infinity, rather than taking it to be zero there? a) Nothing; the field and the potential would have the same values at every finite point. b) The electric potential would become infinite at every finite point, and the electric field could not be defined. c) The electric potential everywhere would be \(100 \mathrm{~V}\) higher, and the electric field would be the same. d) It would depend on the situation. For example, the potential due to a positive point charge would drop off more slowly with distance, so the magnitude of the electric field would be less.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The consequence of setting the electric potential at infinity to +100 V is that the electric potential at every finite point will be 100 V higher, while the electric field remains the same.

Step by step solution

01

Checking option a)

The first option proposes that changing the potential at infinity to +100 V would have no effect on the electric field or potential at every finite point. This looks contradictory, since the potential is directly related to the electric field, so it can't remain unaffected when the reference point is changed. Therefore, option a) is not correct.
02

Checking option b)

The second option suggests that if we set the potential at infinity to +100 V, the electric potential would become infinite at every finite point, and the electric field could not be defined. This statement seems unrealistic because the electric field would still exist, in spite of changing the reference point of the potential. Thus, option b) is not correct either.
03

Checking option c)

The third option says that changing the potential at infinity would cause the electric potential everywhere to be 100 V higher, while the electric field would remain the same. Indeed, setting the potential to +100 V at infinity would shift the reference point, but this shift will not alter the electric field since it only depends on the position of charges and their magnitudes. Consequently, option c) seems the most logical, and we accept option c) as the correct answer.
04

Checking option d) for understanding

The last option suggests that the result of setting the potential at infinity to +100V would depend on the situation. However, this is not the case, as it will only shift the reference point without affecting the electric field. Therefore, option d) is incorrect. In conclusion, modifying the reference point for potential at infinity to +100 V only affects the potential's value by adding 100 V everywhere, while the electric field remains unchanged. Therefore, the correct answer is option c).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A point charge of \(+2.0 \mu C\) is located at \((2.5 \mathrm{~m}, 3.2 \mathrm{~m})\) A second point charge of \(-3.1 \mu \mathrm{C}\) is located at \((-2.1 \mathrm{~m}, 1.0 \mathrm{~m})\). a) What is the electric potential at the origin? b) Along a line passing through both point charges, at what point(s) is (are) the electric potential(s) equal to zero?

The electric field, \(\vec{E}(\vec{r}),\) and the electric potential \(V(\vec{r}),\) are calculated from the charge distribution, \(\rho(\vec{r}),\) by integrating Coulomb's Law and then the electric field. In the other direction, the field and the charge distribution are determined from the potential by suitably differentiating. Suppose the electric potential in a large region of space is given by \(V(r)=V_{0} \exp \left(-r^{2} / a^{2}\right),\) where \(V_{0}\) and \(a\) are constants and \(r=\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}\) is the distance from the origin. a) Find the electric field \(\vec{E}(\vec{r})\) in this region. b) Determine the charge density \(\rho(\vec{r})\) in this region, which gives rise to the potential and field. c) Find the total charge in this region. d) Roughly sketch the charge distribution that could give rise to such an electric field.

Fully stripped (all electrons removed) sulfur \(\left({ }^{32} \mathrm{~S}\right)\) ions are accelerated in an accelerator from rest using a total voltage of \(1.00 \cdot 10^{9} \mathrm{~V}\). \({ }^{32} \mathrm{~S}\) has 16 protons and 16 neutrons. The accelerator produces a beam consisting of \(6.61 \cdot 10^{12}\) ions per second. This beam of ions is completely stopped in a beam dump. What is the total power the beam dump has to absorb?

Four identical point charges \((+1.61 \mathrm{nC})\) are placed at the corners of a rectangle, which measures \(3.00 \mathrm{~m}\) by \(5.00 \mathrm{~m}\). If the electric potential is taken to be zero at infinity, what is the potential at the geometric center of this rectangle?

A \(2.50-\mathrm{mg}\) dust particle with a charge of \(1.00 \mu \mathrm{C}\) falls at a point \(x=2.00 \mathrm{~m}\) in a region where the electric potential varies according to \(V(x)=\left(2.00 \mathrm{~V} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\right) x^{2}-\left(3.00 \mathrm{~V} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\right) x^{3}\) With what acceleration will the particle start moving after it touches down?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free