Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Does a refrigerator that has a higher COP necessarily have a higher second-law efficiency than one with a lower COP? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: No, a refrigerator with a higher COP does not necessarily have a higher second-law efficiency than one with a lower COP. The second-law efficiency depends on the comparison of the actual and ideal COPs.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Coefficient of Performance (COP)

The Coefficient of Performance (COP) is a measure of a refrigerator's efficiency. It is defined as the ratio of the desired effect (e.g., cooling) to the energy input required to achieve that effect. For refrigerators, the COP is given by the formula: \[ COP = \frac{Q_{L}}{W} \] where \(Q_{L}\) is the amount of heat removed from the low-temperature reservoir, and \(W\) is the work input required.
02

Understand the Second-law Efficiency

The second-law efficiency is an indicator of how close a device is to its maximum possible efficiency (i.e., its efficiency compared to an ideal device operating under the same conditions). It is the ratio of the actual output to the maximum possible output given the same energy input and is given by the formula: \[ \eta _{II} = \frac{\eta _{actual}}{\eta _{ideal}} \] where \(\eta _{actual}\) is the actual efficiency and \(\eta _{ideal}\) is the ideal efficiency.
03

Relationship between COP and Second-law Efficiency

To find out if a refrigerator with a higher COP necessarily has a higher second-law efficiency than one with a lower COP, let's examine the relationship between these two efficiencies. The ideal efficiency for a refrigerator is determined by the Carnot cycle, which is given by: \[ COP_{ideal} = \frac{T_L}{T_H - T_L} \] where \(T_L\) is the low-temperature reservoir (COP is highest at lower absolute temperatures), and \(T_H\) is the high-temperature reservoir. As a result, the second-law efficiency can be written as: \[ \eta _{II} = \frac{COP_{actual}}{COP_{ideal}} \]
04

Conclusion

The relationship between the actual COP and the second-law efficiency depends on the actual and ideal COP values. Therefore, a refrigerator with a higher COP does not necessarily have a higher second-law efficiency than one with a lower COP, as it depends on the comparison of the actual and ideal COPs.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

\Air enters a compressor at ambient conditions of 15 psia and \(60^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) with a low velocity and exits at 150 psia, \(620^{\circ} \mathrm{F},\) and \(350 \mathrm{ft} / \mathrm{s}\). The compressor is cooled by the ambient air at \(60^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\) at a rate of \(1500 \mathrm{Btu} / \mathrm{min} .\) The power input to the compressor is 400 hp. Determine \((a)\) the mass flow rate of air and \((b)\) the portion of the power input that is used just to overcome the irreversibilities.

Refrigerant-134a enters an adiabatic compressor at \(-30^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) as a saturated vapor at a rate of \(0.45 \mathrm{m}^{3} / \mathrm{min}\) and leaves at \(900 \mathrm{kPa}\) and \(55^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). Determine \((a)\) the power input to the compressor, \((b)\) the isentropic efficiency of the compressor, and \((c)\) the rate of exergy destruction and the second-law efficiency of the compressor. Take \(T_{0}=\) \(27^{\circ} \mathrm{C} .\) Answers: (a) \(1.92 \mathrm{kW},\) (b) 85.3 percent, \((c) 0.261 \mathrm{kW}\)

A crater lake has a base area of \(20,000 \mathrm{m}^{2},\) and the water it contains is \(12 \mathrm{m}\) deep. The ground surrounding the crater is nearly flat and is \(140 \mathrm{m}\) below the base of the lake. Determine the maximum amount of electrical work, in \(\mathrm{kWh}\) that can be generated by feeding this water to a hydroelectric power plant. Answer: \(95,500 \mathrm{kWh}\).

Argon gas enters an adiabatic compressor at \(120 \mathrm{kPa}\) and \(30^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) with a velocity of \(20 \mathrm{m} / \mathrm{s}\) and exits at \(1.2 \mathrm{MPa}\) \(530^{\circ} \mathrm{C},\) and \(80 \mathrm{m} / \mathrm{s}\). The inlet area of the compressor is \(130 \mathrm{cm}^{2} .\) Assuming the surroundings to be at \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), determine the reversible power input and exergy destroyed.

In large steam power plants, the feedwater is frequently heated in closed feedwater heaters, which are basically heat exchangers, by steam extracted from the turbine at some stage. Steam enters the feedwater heater at \(1.6 \mathrm{MPa}\) and \(250^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and leaves as saturated liquid at the same pressure. Feedwater enters the heater at \(4 \mathrm{MPa}\) and \(30^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and leaves \(10^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) below the exit temperature of the steam. Neglecting any heat losses from the outer surfaces of the heater, determine (a) the ratio of the mass flow rates of the extracted steam and the feedwater heater and \((b)\) the reversible work for this process per unit mass of the feedwater. Assume the surroundings to be at \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free