Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Why is mercury a suitable working fluid for the topping portion of a binary vapor cycle but not for the bottoming cycle?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Mercury is suitable for use as a working fluid in the topping portion of a binary vapor cycle due to its high boiling point, low specific volume, low viscosity, and high thermal conductivity. These properties allow it to stay in the liquid phase at high temperatures, reduce the size and weight of the power generation equipment, and provide efficient heat transfer. However, mercury's high boiling point makes it unsuitable for the bottoming portion, as it would remain in the liquid phase throughout the entire cycle, preventing effective heat transfer and the completion of the thermodynamic cycle.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Binary Vapor Cycles

In a binary vapor cycle, two working fluids are used for power generation: one fluid for the topping (or high-temperature) portion, and another fluid for the bottoming (or low-temperature) portion. The main advantage of this setup is that the working fluids can be chosen for their specific properties, i.e., each fluid's suitability is maximized for its respective portion in the cycle.
02

Properties of Mercury

Mercury is a metal with a high thermal conductivity, high boiling point, and low viscosity. It has a low specific volume in comparison to other fluids typically used in vapor power cycles (steam, for example). Let's examine how these properties affect mercury's suitability as a working fluid in both the topping and bottoming portions of a binary vapor cycle.
03

Mercury in the Topping Cycle

In the topping cycle, the working fluid undergoes a phase change at high pressures and temperatures. Due to its high boiling point, mercury can stay in the liquid phase at the high temperatures involved in a topping cycle. Its low specific volume reduces the size and weight of the power generation equipment necessary for the process, which is advantageous. Mercury's low viscosity and high thermal conductivity result in low pumping losses and efficient heat transfer, making it suitable for use as a working fluid in the topping cycle.
04

Mercury in the Bottoming Cycle

In contrast, the bottoming cycle operates at a lower temperature and pressure compared to the topping cycle. Mercury's high boiling point makes it unsuitable for this portion of the cycle, as it would remain in the liquid phase throughout the entire bottoming cycle. This would prevent heat transfer from occurring effectively and the thermodynamic cycle couldn't be completed. Instead, fluids with lower boiling points (such as water or organic fluids) are typically used for the bottoming cycle since they can undergo phase change at the lower temperatures involved. In conclusion, the properties of mercury make it suitable for use as a working fluid in the topping portion of a binary vapor cycle, but not for the bottoming portion due to its high boiling point and incompatibility with the lower temperature and pressure conditions in the bottoming cycle.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Working Fluids in Vapor Power Cycles
The choice of working fluid in vapor power cycles is critical for the efficiency and effectiveness of the power generation process. Working fluids are substances that absorb and transfer thermal energy during the thermodynamic cycle. In vapor power cycles, this usually involves a liquid-to-vapor phase change. The ideal working fluid in these cycles must have physical properties that align with the operational conditions, such as a suitable boiling point, high thermal conductivity, and low viscosity.

These properties ensure that the fluid can efficiently absorb heat at high pressures without requiring excessively large and costly equipment to contain it. Furthermore, low viscosity decreases the resistance to flow, which reduces energy losses due to friction, thereby increasing efficiency. Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) fluids and refrigerants are commonly used, each offering different advantages depending on the temperature range and thermal stability required.

When selecting a working fluid, engineers must consider the environmental impact as well, including factors like ozone depletion potential and global warming potential. This makes the use of non-toxic and less environmentally damaging substances desirable. In summary, selecting an appropriate working fluid is a complex yet essential task for optimizing vapor power cycles.
Mercury as a Working Fluid
Mercury's unique properties make it an intriguing choice as a working fluid in certain industrial applications. Its high boiling point, which stands at approximately 356°C (673°F), allows mercury to remain in the liquid phase under conditions that would vaporize most other fluids. This is essential in high-temperature applications, which makes mercury suitable for the topping portion of binary vapor cycles, where the working fluid is exposed to the highest temperatures of the system.

Additionally, mercury's low specific volume contributes to the compact design of power generation equipment. This can mean savings in material costs and space. Moreover, mercury's low viscosity and high thermal conductivity promote excellent heat transfer capabilities, thus lowering energy losses that occur during the fluid's circulation through the cycle.

However, due to mercury's toxicity and environmental ramifications, its use has been significantly reduced or eliminated in many industries. The challenge of safe handling and containment also contributes to limiting its application, especially in light of the availability of less hazardous alternatives.
Topping and Bottoming Cycles
A binary vapor cycle is an advanced thermodynamic concept that utilizes two distinct thermodynamic cycles in series to enhance the overall efficiency of power generation. The first of these two cycles is the topping cycle, which operates at higher temperatures and pressures to extract energy. It's called 'topping' because it 'tops off' the thermal energy from the highest temperature source.

Following the topping phase, the exhaust heat - which is at a lower temperature than what was input into the topping cycle but still has usable energy - is employed in the bottoming cycle. The bottoming cycle extracts additional energy at lower temperatures, effectively utilizing the residual heat that would otherwise be wasted.

Importance of Selecting Suitable Fluids

Each cycle requires a working fluid with properties tailored to its specific temperature and pressure conditions. For instance, a fluid like mercury, with a high boiling point, would be unsuitable for the bottoming cycle since it won't vaporize at the lower temperatures involved. Instead, fluids with lower boiling points such as water or other organic compounds are utilized.

Combining topping and bottoming cycles is an integral part of the cogeneration and combined-cycle power plants, which can significantly exceed the efficiencies of single-cycle power plants. This synergetic approach to power generation makes it possible to achieve higher overall thermodynamic efficiency by capturing and using waste heat.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a cogeneration power plant modified with regeneration. Steam enters the turbine at \(6 \mathrm{MPa}\) and \(450^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) at a rate of \(20 \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{s}\) and expands to a pressure of 0.4 MPa. At this pressure, 60 percent of the steam is extracted from the turbine, and the remainder expands to a pressure of \(10 \mathrm{kPa} .\) Part of the extracted steam is used to heat feedwater in an open feedwater heater. The rest of the extracted steam is used for process heating and leaves the process heater as a saturated liquid at 0.4 MPa. It is subsequently mixed with the feedwater leaving the feedwater heater, and the mixture is pumped to the boiler pressure. The steam in the condenser is cooled and condensed by the cooling water from a nearby river, which enters the adiabatic condenser at a rate of \(463 \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{s}\). 1\. The total power output of the turbine is \((a) 17.0 \mathrm{MW}\) \((b) 8.4 \mathrm{MW}\) \((c) 12.2 \mathrm{MW}\) \((d) 20.0 \mathrm{MW}\) \((e) 3.4 \mathrm{MW}\) 2\. The temperature rise of the cooling water from the river in the condenser is \((a) 8.0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) \((b) 5.2^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) \((c) 9.6^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) \((d) 12.9^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) \((e) 16.2^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) 3\. The mass flow rate of steam through the process heater is \((a) 1.6 \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{s}\) \((b)3.8 \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{s}\) \((c) 5.2 \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{s}\) \((d) 7.6 \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{s}\) \((e) 10.4 \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{s}\) 4\. The rate of heat supply from the process heater per unit mass of steam passing through it is \((a) 246 \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{kg}\) \((b) 893 \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{kg}\) \((c) 1344 \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{kg}\) \((d) 1891 \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{kg}\) \((e) 2060 \mathrm{kJ} / \mathrm{kg}\). 5\. The rate of heat transfer to the steam in the boiler is \((a) 26.0 \mathrm{MJ} / \mathrm{s}\) \((b) 53.8 \mathrm{MJ} / \mathrm{s}\) \((c) 39.5 \mathrm{MJ} / \mathrm{s}\) \((d) 62.8 \mathrm{MJ} / \mathrm{s}\) \((e) 125.4 \mathrm{MJ} / \mathrm{s}\)

Consider a simple ideal Rankine cycle and an ideal regenerative Rankine cycle with one open feed water heater. The two cycles are very much alike, except the feed water in the regenerative cycle is heated by extracting some steam just before it enters the turbine. How would you compare the efficiencies of these two cycles?

A simple ideal Rankine cycle operates between the pressure limits of \(10 \mathrm{kPa}\) and \(5 \mathrm{MPa}\), with a turbine inlet temperature of \(600^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). The mass fraction of steam that condenses at the turbine exit is \((a) 6\) percent \((b) 9\)percent \((c) 12\) percent \((d) 15\) percent \((e) 18\) percent

Consider a cogeneration power plant modified with regeneration. Steam enters the turbine at \(9 \mathrm{MPa}\) and \(400^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and expands to a pressure of 1.6 MPa. At this pressure, 35 percent of the steam is extracted from the turbine, and the remainder expands to \(10 \mathrm{kPa}\). Part of the extracted steam is used to heat the feedwater in an open feedwater heater. The rest of the extracted steam is used for process heating and leaves the process heater as a saturated liquid at \(1.6 \mathrm{MPa}\). It is subsequently mixed with the feedwater leaving the feedwater heater, and the mixture is pumped to the boiler pressure. Assuming the turbines and the pumps to be isentropic, show the cycle on a \(T\) -s diagram with respect to saturation lines, and determine the mass flow rate of steam through the boiler for a net power output of \(25 \mathrm{MW}\).

Consider a simple ideal Rankine cycle with fixed turbine inlet conditions. What is the effect of lowering the condenser pressure on

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free