Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider a cogeneration plant for which the utilization factor is \(1 .\) Is the irreversibility associated with this cycle necessarily zero? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Short answer: No, a cogeneration plant with a utilization factor of 1 does not necessarily have zero irreversibility. The utilization factor is a measure of the energy conversion efficiency of the plant and does not account for internal irreversible processes, such as friction and heat transfer, that may occur within the plant.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the utilization factor

The utilization factor is a measure of the efficiency of a cogeneration plant. It is defined as the ratio of the useful output energy (both power and heat) to the input energy in the system. It can have a value between 0 and 1. A utilization factor of 1 indicates that the cogeneration plant is converting all of the input energy into useful output energy (power and heat), which means the efficiency of the plant is 100%.
02

Understand the concept of irreversibility

In thermodynamics, irreversibility refers to a process that is not reversible, meaning it cannot be undone and returned to its initial state without some form of external intervention or the loss of energy. The irreversibility in a process is usually caused by internal factors like friction, heat transfer across finite temperature differences, or other dissipative processes, which result in a loss of useful work, increasing the entropy of the system.
03

Relate utilization factor and irreversibility

Even though the utilization factor in this case is 1, which means all the input energy is converted into useful output energy, it does not imply that the process is completely reversible, i.e., having zero irreversibility. The utilization factor is only telling us that the plant successfully converts all the input energy into useful energy; it does not provide information about the internal processes that cause irreversibility (like friction and heat transfer) within the plant.
04

Conclusion

Based on the above analysis, it can be concluded that a cogeneration plant with a utilization factor of 1 does not necessarily mean that the irreversibility associated with the cycle is zero. The utilization factor is solely a measure of the energy conversion efficiency of the plant and does not account for the internal irreversible processes taking place within the plant.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Utilization Factor
In the context of a cogeneration plant, the utilization factor is a crucial metric that gauges the plant's effectiveness in converting fuel into both electrical power and thermal energy. Imagine this factor as a report card score - a utilization factor of 1 would be akin to a perfect 100%, indicating exemplary performance. However, it's vital to understand that while a perfect score means all energy from the fuel has been transformed into useful outputs, it doesn't necessarily serve as a testimony to how the energy was converted.

Here's why: The utilization factor doesn't reflect the path taken to convert energy. It's akin to knowing that a student scored A+ without understanding if they studied efficiently or crammed last minute. Similarly, a cogeneration plant with a utilization factor of 1 says nothing about any internal frictions or energy leaks – the so-called irreversibilities. Hence, it is possible to have a high utilization factor yet still have room for improvement in terms of the process efficiency.
Irreversibility in Thermodynamics
When delving into the subject of thermodynamics, irreversibility is much like a one-way street. It characterizes processes that can't simply be reversed – a spilled glass of milk can’t be unspilled. This concept is put into play in cogeneration plants, where energy transformations are always accompanied by some degree of irreversibility, such as heat losses or friction.

This inherent imperfection is quantified through what's known as 'entropy', a measure of disorder which, in simple terms, acts like a scorecard for the messiness in energy transformations. Even in a cogeneration plant where the utilization factor is at its zenith, there are still inevitable inefficiencies – grappling with nuances like energy dispersion that dances away as waste heat, or resistance that consumes tiny bits of power. Such inescapable realities remind us that even the best systems aren't beyond the reach of thermodynamics’ ironclad second law: in any process, some potential for work will always slip through the cracks, so to speak.
Energy Conversion Efficiency
Understanding energy conversion efficiency is akin to appreciating a chef's skill in the kitchen – it's all about how well the raw ingredients (in this case, fuel) are transformed into the desired meal (power and heat). This efficiency is a broad stroke assessment of a cogeneration plant's ability to convert input energy into valuable outputs without much going to waste.

In an ideal world, cogeneration plants would operate like a dream kitchen where every scrap of ingredient is used to its fullest potential. But reality often falls short of this ideal, and that's where optimization comes into play – by reducing waste, improving system components, and adapting operations, plants strive to turn more of their fuel into energy everyone can use. While perfect efficiency remains a pie in the sky due to the aforementioned irreversibilities, continuous advancements in technology and design bring us closer to minimizing lost energy – creating a more sustainable and cost-effective energy landscape for the future.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A steam Rankine cycle operates between the pressure limits of 1500 psia in the boiler and 2 psia in the condenser. The turbine inlet temperature is \(800^{\circ} \mathrm{F}\). The turbine isentropic efficiency is 90 percent, the pump losses are negligible, and the cycle is sized to produce \(2500 \mathrm{kW}\) of power. Calculate the mass flow rate through the boiler, the power produced by the turbine, the rate of heat supply in the boiler, and the thermal efficiency.

The gas-turbine portion of a combined gas-steam power plant has a pressure ratio of \(16 .\) Air enters the compressor at \(300 \mathrm{K}\) at a rate of \(14 \mathrm{kg} / \mathrm{s}\) and is heated to \(1500 \mathrm{K}\) in the combustion chamber. The combustion gases leaving the gas turbine are used to heat the steam to \(400^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) at \(10 \mathrm{MPa}\) in a heat exchanger. The combustion gases leave the heat exchanger at 420 K. The steam leaving the turbine is condensed at 15 kPa. Assuming all the compression and expansion processes to be isentropic, determine \((a)\) the mass flow rate of the steam, \((b)\) the net power output, and \((c)\) the thermal efficiency of the combined cycle. For air, assume constant specific heats at room temperature.

A steam power plant operates on a simple ideal Rankine cycle between the pressure limits of 1250 and 2 psia. The mass flow rate of steam through the cycle is \(75 \mathrm{lbm} / \mathrm{s}\). The moisture content of the steam at the turbine exit is not to exceed 10 percent. Show the cycle on a \(T-s\) diagram with respect to saturation lines, and determine \((a)\) the minimum turbine inlet temperature, \((b)\) the rate of heat input in the boiler, and \((c)\) the thermal efficiency of the cycle.

A steam power plant operates on an ideal regenerative Rankine cycle. Steam enters the turbine at \(6 \mathrm{MPa}\) and \(450^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) and is condensed in the condenser at \(20 \mathrm{kPa}\). Steam is extracted from the turbine at \(0.4 \mathrm{MPa}\) to heat the feed water in an open feed water heater. Water leaves the feed water heater as a saturated liquid. Show the cycle on a \(T\) -s diagram, and determine ( \(a\) ) the net work output per kilogram of steam flowing through the boiler and ( \(b\) ) the thermal efficiency of the cycle.

Consider a simple ideal Rankine cycle and an ideal regenerative Rankine cycle with one open feed water heater. The two cycles are very much alike, except the feed water in the regenerative cycle is heated by extracting some steam just before it enters the turbine. How would you compare the efficiencies of these two cycles?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free