Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20


Can kinetic energy be negative? Explain

Short Answer

Expert verified

Kinetic energy cannot be negative.

Step by step solution

01

Kinetic energy of a body

The formula for calculating the kinetic energy associated with a body having mass moving with a velocity of is given by the following:

Ek=12mv2

By increasing the value of mass and the velocity of the body, the value of the body’s kinetic energy can be increased.

02

Negative kinetic energy 

The value of the mass of a body can never be negative. Either the squared value of the velocity cannot be negative.

According to the formula for the kinetic energy of the body, the value of the kinetic energy cannot be negative.

Hence, kinetic energy cannot be negative.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A cart is set rolling across a level table, at the same speed on every trial. If it runs into a patch of sand, the cart exerts on the sand an average horizontal force of 6N and travels a distance of through the sand as it comes to a stop. If instead the cart runs into a patch of gravel on which the cart exerts an average horizontal force of 9N, how far into the gravel will the cart roll before stopping? (a) 9cm (b) 6cm (c) 4cm (d) 3cm (e) none of those answers.

Let N^represent the direction horizontally north, NE^represent northeast (halfway between north and east), and so on. Each direction specification can be thought of as a unit vector. Rank from the largest to the smallest the following dot products. Note that zero is larger than a negative number. If two quantities are equal, display that fact in your ranking. (a) N^·N^ (b)N^·NE^ (c) N^·S^(d) N^·E^(e)SE^·S^ .

(i) Rank the gravitational accelerations you would measure for the following falling objects: (a) a 2-Kg object 5 cm above the floor, (b) a 2 Kg object 120 cm above the floor, (c) a 3 Kg object 80 cm above the floor, and (d) a object above the floor. List the one with the largest magnitude of acceleration first. If any are equal, show their equality in your list. (ii) Rank the gravitational forces on the same four objects, listing the one with the largest magnitude first. (iii) Rank the gravitational potential energies (of the object–Earth system) for the same four objects, largest first, and taking y = 0 at the floor.

Can a normal force do work? If not, why not? If so, give an example.

In a control system, an accelerometer consists of a 4.7 g object sliding on a calibrated horizontal rail. A low-mass spring attaches the object to a flange at one end of the rail. Grease on the rail makes static friction negligible, but rapidly damps out vibrations of the sliding object. When subject to a steady acceleration of

, the object should be at a location away from its equilibrium position. Find the force constant of the spring required for the calibration to be correct.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free