Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Show mathematically that $2^{-t / T_{12}}=\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{t / T_{12}}=e^{-t / \tau}\( if and only if \)T_{1 / 2}=\tau \ln 2 .$ [Hint: Take the natural logarithm of each side. \(]\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Question: Show that \(2^{-t / T_{12}}=\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{t / T_{12}}=e^{-t / \tau}\) if and only if \(T_{1 / 2}=\tau \ln 2\). Answer: We showed that the given equation holds only if \(T_{12} = \tau \ln 2\) using logarithm properties and algebraic manipulations. Conversely, we proved that assuming \(T_{12} = \tau \ln 2\) implies the given equation. Hence, the given equation is true if and only if \(T_{1 / 2} = \tau \ln 2\).

Step by step solution

01

Proving that \(2^{-t / T_{12}}=\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{t / T_{12}}=e^{-t / \tau}\) implies \(T_{1 / 2}=\tau \ln 2\)

First, we'll prove the implication from the given equation to the desired result. Start with the given equation: \(2^{-t / T_{12}}=e^{-t / \tau}\) Now, take the natural logarithm of both sides: \(\ln{(2^{-t / T_{12}})} = \ln{e^{-t / \tau}}\) Using logarithm properties, we can simplify this to: \(-\frac{t}{T_{12}}\ln{2} = -\frac{t}{\tau}\) Now, cancel the \(-t\) term from both sides: \(\frac{\ln{2}}{T_{12}} = \frac{1}{\tau}\) Rearrange to solve for \(T_{12}\): \(T_{12} = \frac{\ln{2}}{1/ \tau} = \tau \ln{2}\) So, we have shown that the given equation implies \(T_{1 / 2}=\tau \ln 2\).
02

Proving that \(T_{1 / 2}=\tau \ln 2\) implies \(2^{-t / T_{12}}=\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{t / T_{12}}=e^{-t / \tau}\)

Now, we'll prove the implication from the desired result back to the given equation. Start with the given condition: \(T_{12} = \tau \ln 2\) Rewrite this as: \(\frac{1}{T_{12}} = \frac{1}{\tau \ln 2}\) Now, substitute this into the exponent of the equation we are trying to reach: \(2^{-t / T_{12}}=2^{-t / (\tau \ln 2)}\) Since \(\ln{(2^x)} = x \ln{2}\), we can rewrite this as: \(2^{-t / T_{12}}=e^{-t \frac{\ln{(2)}}{\tau \ln 2}}\) Now, cancel out the \(\ln 2\) in the exponent: \(2^{-t / T_{12}}=e^{-t / \tau}\) So, we have shown that \(T_{1 / 2}=\tau \ln 2\) implies \(2^{-t / T_{12}}=\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{t / T_{12}}=e^{-t / \tau}\). Thus, we have proved that \(2^{-t / T_{12}}=\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{t / T_{12}}=e^{-t / \tau}\) if and only if \(T_{1 / 2}=\tau \ln 2\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The reactions listed in Problem 51 did not stop there. To the surprise of the Curies, the phosphorus decay continued after the \(\alpha\) bombardment ended with the phosphorus \(^{30}\) is \(\mathrm{P}\) emitting a \(\beta^{+}\) to form yet another product. Write out this reaction, identifying the other product.
An \(\alpha\) particle with a kinetic energy of \(1.0 \mathrm{MeV}\) is headed straight toward a gold nucleus. (a) Find the distance of closest approach between the centers of the \(\alpha\) particle and gold nucleus. (Assume the gold nucleus remains stationary. since its mass is much larger than that of the \(\alpha\) particle, this assumption is a fairly good approximation.) (b) Will the two get close enough to "touch"? (c) What is the minimum initial kinetic energy of an \(\alpha\) particle that will make contact with the gold nucleus?
Show that the spontaneous \(\alpha\) decay of \(^{19} \mathrm{O}\) is not possible.
Approximately what is the total energy of the neutrino emitted when ${ }_{11}^{22} \mathrm{Na}$ decays by electron capture?
Once Rutherford and Geiger determined the charge-to mass ratio of the \(\alpha\) particle (Problem 71 ), they performed another experiment to determine its charge. An \(\alpha\) source was placed in an evacuated chamber with a fluorescent screen. Through a glass window in the chamber, they could see a flash on the screen every time an \(\alpha\) particle hit it. They used a magnetic field to deflect \(\beta\) particles away from the screen so they were sure that every flash represented an alpha particle. (a) Why is the deflection of a \(\beta\) particle in a magnetic field much larger than the deflection of an \(\alpha\) particle moving at the same speed? (b) By counting the flashes, they could determine the number of \(\alpha\) s per second striking the screen (R). Then they replaced the screen with a metal plate connected to an electroscope and measured the charge \(Q\) accumulated in a time \(\Delta t .\) What is the \(\alpha\) -particle charge in terms of \(R, Q,\) and \(\Delta t ?\)
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free