Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

An image of a biological sample is to have a resolution of \(5 \mathrm{nm} .\) (a) What is the kinetic energy of a beam of electrons with a de Broglie wavelength of \(5.0 \mathrm{nm} ?\) (b) Through what potential difference should the electrons be accelerated to have this wavelength? (c) Why not just use a light microscope with a wavelength of 5 nm to image the sample?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The kinetic energy required for an electron beam is approximately 9.614 x 10^-19 J, and the potential difference needed is around 6.01 kV. The limitations of using a light microscope with a wavelength of 5 nm include potential damage to the biological sample from high-energy photons, the need for specialized lenses for high-energy photon handling, and limited depth information in the obtained images, making it difficult to get detailed three-dimensional imaging. For this reason, using an electron microscope would be more suitable for imaging biological samples at a resolution of 5 nm.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the de Broglie wavelength of the electrons

Given that the required resolution is 5 nm, we can start by finding out the de Broglie wavelength of the electron beam, which is also 5 nm. The de Broglie wavelength \(\lambda\) is given by the formula: $$\lambda = \frac{h}{p}$$ where \(h\) is Planck's constant (\(6.626 \times 10^{-34} \, \text{Js}\)) and \(p\) is the momentum of the electron.
02

Calculate the momentum of the electrons

To calculate the momentum of the electrons, we first need to rearrange the de Broglie wavelength formula to solve for \(p\): $$p = \frac{h}{\lambda}$$ Substituting the values for \(h\) and \(\lambda\) into the formula and solving for \(p\): $$p = \frac{6.626 \times 10^{-34} \, \text{Js}}{5 \times 10^{-9} \, \text{m}} = 1.3252 \times 10^{-25} \, \text{kg m/s}$$
03

Calculate the kinetic energy of the electrons

Now that we have the momentum of the electrons, we can calculate their kinetic energy. The relationship between momentum (\(p\)), mass (\(m\)) and velocity (\(v\)) is given by: $$p = mv$$ The kinetic energy (\(K\)) can be calculated using the formula: $$K = \frac{1}{2}mv^2$$ Solving for \(v\) in the momentum formula and substituting it into the kinetic energy formula, we get: $$K = \frac{p^2}{2m}$$ Using the mass of the electron ((\(9.11 \times 10^{-31} \, \text{kg}\))) and the calculated momentum: $$K = \frac{(1.3252 \times 10^{-25} \, \text{kg m/s})^2}{2(9.11 \times 10^{-31} \, \text{kg})} \approx 9.614 \times 10^{-19} \, \text{J}$$ So, the kinetic energy of the electron beam is approximately \(9.614 \times 10^{-19} \, \text{J}\).
04

Calculate the potential difference needed to achieve the calculated kinetic energy

The relationship between kinetic energy and potential difference is given by: $$K = eV$$ where \(K\) is kinetic energy, \(e\) is the electron charge (\(1.6 \times 10^{-19} \, \text{C}\)), and \(V\) is the potential difference. Rearranging for \(V\): $$V = \frac{K}{e}$$ Substituting the values for \(K\) and \(e\): $$V = \frac{9.614 \times 10^{-19} \, \text{J}}{1.6 \times 10^{-19} \, \text{C}} \approx 6.01 \, \text{kV}$$ A potential difference of about 6.01 kV is needed.
05

Discuss the limitations of using a light microscope with a wavelength of 5 nm

Using a light microscope with a wavelength of 5 nm to image the sample is not practical due to several reasons. Firstly, the energy of the light photons with a wavelength of 5 nm would be very high, and this could potentially damage the biological sample. Secondly, optical imaging systems have limitations in their resolving power, and using such short wavelengths of light would require the use of lenses and optics capable of handling the high-energy photons. These specialized lenses are not easily available and are likely to be very expensive. Finally, using a light microscope with a wavelength of 5 nm would provide limited depth information for the sample, making it difficult to get detailed, three-dimensional images. Overall, it would be more practical to use an electron microscope to achieve a resolution of 5 nm for imaging biological samples.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

An electron in a one-dimensional box has ground-state energy 0.010 eV. (a) What is the length of the box? (b) Sketch the wave functions for the lowest three energy states of the electron. (c) What is the wavelength of the electron in its second excited state \((n=3) ?\) (d) The electron is in its ground state when it absorbs a photon of wavelength \(15.5 \mu \mathrm{m}\). Find the wavelengths of the photon(s) that could be emitted by the electron subsequently.
The particle in a box model is often used to make rough estimates of energy level spacings. Suppose that you have a proton confined to a one-dimensional box of length equal to a nuclear diameter (about \(10^{-14} \mathrm{m}\) ). (a) What is the energy difference between the first excited state and the ground state of this proton in the box? (b) If this energy is emitted as a photon as the excited proton falls back to the ground state, what is the wavelength and frequency of the electromagnetic wave emitted? In what part of the spectrum does it lie? (c) Sketch the wave function \(\psi\) as a function of position for the proton in this box for the ground state and each of the first three excited states.
(a) Show that the ground-state energy of the hydrogen atom can be written \(E_{1}=-k e^{2} /\left(2 a_{0}\right),\) where \(a_{0}\) is the Bohr radius. (b) Explain why, according to classical physics, an electron with energy \(E_{1}\) could never be found at a distance greater than \(2 a_{0}\) from the nucleus.
Before the discovery of the neutron, one theory of the nucleus proposed that the nucleus contains protons and electrons. For example, the helium-4 nucleus would contain 4 protons and 2 electrons instead of - as we now know to be true- 2 protons and 2 neutrons. (a) Assuming that the electron moves at nonrelativistic speeds, find the ground-state energy in mega-electron- volts of an electron confined to a one-dimensional box of length $5.0 \mathrm{fm}\( (the approximate diameter of the \)^{4} \mathrm{He}$ nucleus). (The electron actually does move at relativistic speeds. See Problem \(80 .)\) (b) What can you conclude about the electron-proton model of the nucleus? The binding energy of the \(^{4} \mathrm{He}\) nucleus - the energy that would have to be supplied to break the nucleus into its constituent particles-is about \(28 \mathrm{MeV} .\) (c) Repeat (a) for a neutron confined to the nucleus (instead of an electron). Compare your result with (a) and comment on the viability of the proton-neutron theory relative to the electron-proton theory.
What is the largest number of electrons with the same pair of values for \(n\) and \(\ell\) that an atom can have?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free