Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In a double-slit interference experiment, the wavelength is \(475 \mathrm{nm}\), the slit separation is \(0.120 \mathrm{mm},\) and the screen is $36.8 \mathrm{cm}$ away from the slits. What is the linear distance between adjacent maxima on the screen? [Hint: Assume the small-angle approximation is justified and then check the validity of your assumption once you know the value of the separation between adjacent maxima.] (tutorial: double slit 1 ).

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The linear distance between adjacent maxima on the screen is approximately 1.457 mm.

Step by step solution

01

Convert all units to meters

To have consistent units in the calculations, we need to convert all the given values to meters. We have, \(\lambda = 475 \thinspace nm = 475 \times 10^{-9} \thinspace m\), \(d = 0.120 \thinspace mm = 0.120 \times 10^{-3} \thinspace m\), and \(L = 36.8 \thinspace cm = 36.8 \times 10^{-2} \thinspace m\).
02

Use the small-angle approximation formula for the angular separation

Under the small-angle approximation, the angular separation between adjacent maxima (\(θ\)) for a double-slit interference experiment can be calculated using the formula: \(θ = \frac{m\lambda}{d}\), where \(m\) is the order of the maxima (e.g., \(1\) for the first maxima, \(2\) for the second maxima, etc.). Let's consider the distance between the first maxima on either side of the central maxima (i.e., \(m = 1\)). This will give us the distance between adjacent maxima. \(θ = \frac{\lambda}{d} = \frac{475 \times 10^{-9} \thinspace m}{0.120 \times 10^{-3} \thinspace m} = 3.958 \times 10^{-3}\) radians
03

Calculate the linear distance

Now, we need to convert the angular separation (\(θ\)) between adjacent maxima into a linear distance (\(y\)) on the screen. We use the following formula for that: \(y = L\cdot tan(θ) \approx L\cdot θ \thinspace\) (assuming the small-angle approximation) Now, plugging the values, we get: \(y = 36.8 \times 10^{-2} \thinspace m \cdot 3.958 \times 10^{-3}\) radians \(y = 1.457 \times 10^{-3} \thinspace m = 1.457 \thinspace mm\) So, the linear distance between adjacent maxima on the screen is approximately \(1.457 \thinspace mm\).
04

Check the validity of the small-angle approximation

To confirm that the small-angle approximation is valid, we should check if \(tan(θ)\) is approximately equal to \(θ\). If it is, then our answer is accurate. Let's check that: \(tan(3.958 \times 10^{-3}) \approx 3.958 \times 10^{-3}\) Using a calculator, we find that \(tan(3.958 \times 10^{-3}) \approx 3.959 \times 10^{-3}\), which is very close to \(3.958 \times 10^{-3}\). This means that the small-angle approximation is valid and our calculated linear distance between adjacent maxima is accurate.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When Albert turns on his small desk lamp, the light falling on his book has intensity \(I_{0} .\) When this is not quite enough, he turns the small lamp off and turns on a high-intensity lamp so that the light on his book has intensity \(4 I_{0} .\) What is the intensity of light falling on the book when Albert turns both lamps on? If there is more than one possibility, give the range of intensity possibilities.
Instead of an anti reflective coating, suppose you wanted to coat a glass surface to enhance the reflection of visible light. Assuming that $1<n_{\text {coating }}<n_{\text {glass }},$ what should the minimum thickness of the coating be to maximize the reflected intensity for wavelength \(\lambda ?\)
A lens \((n=1.52)\) is coated with a magnesium fluoride film \((n=1.38) .\) (a) If the coating is to cause destructive interference in reflected light for \(\lambda=560 \mathrm{nm}\) (the peak of the solar spectrum), what should its minimum thickness be? (b) At what two wavelengths closest to 560 nm does the coating cause constructive interference in reflected light? (c) Is any visible light reflected? Explain.
White light containing wavelengths from \(400 \mathrm{nm}\) to \(700 \mathrm{nm}\) is shone through a grating. Assuming that at least part of the third-order spectrum is present, show that the second-and third-order spectra always overlap, regardless of the slit separation of the grating.
When a double slit is illuminated with light of wavelength \(510 \mathrm{nm},\) the interference maxima on a screen \(2.4 \mathrm{m}\) away gradually decrease in intensity on either side of the 2.40 -cm-wide central maximum and reach a minimum in a spot where the fifth-order maximum is expected. (a) What is the width of the slits? (b) How far apart are the slits?
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free