Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Calculate the equivalent inductance \(L_{\mathrm{eq}}\) of two ideal inductors, \(L_{1}\) and \(L_{2},\) connected in parallel in a circuit. Assume that their mutual inductance is negligible. [Hint: Imagine replacing the two inductors with a single equivalent inductor \(L_{\mathrm{eq}} .\) How is the emf in the parallel equivalent related to the emfs in the two inductors? What about the currents? \(]\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The equivalent inductance of two ideal inductors connected in parallel is given by the formula: \(L_{\mathrm{eq}} = \frac{L_{1}L_{2}}{L_{1} + L_{2}}\).

Step by step solution

01

Define the relationships for emf and currents in parallel inductors

For inductors in parallel, the emf across each inductor is the same, and currents are inversely proportional to their inductances. Mathematically, we can write these relationships as: 1. \(emf_{L_{1}} = emf_{L_{2}} = emf_{L_{\mathrm{eq}}}\) 2. \(I_{L_{1}}L_{1} = I_{L_{2}}L_{2}\)
02

Apply Kirchhoff's current law for parallel components

According to Kirchhoff's current law, the total current entering the parallel combination must be equal to the sum of the currents through each inductor: \(I_{\mathrm{total}} = I_{L_{1}} + I_{L_{2}}\)
03

Use the current relationship to write an equation for the total current

From step 1, we can write the current in each inductor in terms of the other: \(I_{L_{1}} = \frac{I_{L_{2}}L_{2}}{L_{1}}\) Substituting this expression into the equation for the total current from step 2: \(I_{\mathrm{total}} = \frac{I_{L_{2}}L_{2}}{L_{1}} + I_{L_{2}}\)
04

Define the relationship of equivalent inductance and total current

Since the emf across each inductor is the same, the current through the equivalent inductor is the same as the total current: \(I_{\mathrm{total}} = I_{L_{\mathrm{eq}}}\)
05

Substitute for \(I_{L_{\mathrm{eq}}}\) in terms of \(I_{L_{2}}\) and inductances

Using the second relationship from step 1, the current through the equivalent inductor can be written as: \(I_{L_{\mathrm{eq}}} = \frac{emf_{L_{\mathrm{eq}}}}{L_{\mathrm{eq}}}\) Since \(emf_{L_{1}} = emf_{L_{2}} = emf_{L_{\mathrm{eq}}}\), we can also write the current through \(L_{2}\) as: \(I_{L_{2}} = \frac{emf_{L_{2}}}{L_{2}}\) Now we can substitute this expression into the equation from step 4: \(I_{\mathrm{total}} = \frac{I_{L_{2}}L_{2}}{L_{1}} + I_{L_{2}} = \frac{emf_{L_{2}}}{L_{2}} \cdot (\frac{L_{2}}{L_{1}} + 1)\)
06

Equate the expressions for total current and solve for equivalent inductance

Now we can equate the expressions for \(I_{\mathrm{total}}\) from steps 3 and 5: \(\frac{emf_{L_{\mathrm{eq}}}}{L_{\mathrm{eq}}} = \frac{emf_{L_{2}}}{L_{2}} \cdot (\frac{L_{2}}{L_{1}} + 1)\) Since \(emf_{L_{\mathrm{eq}}} = emf_{L_{2}}\), they cancel each other, thus we have: \(\frac{1}{L_{\mathrm{eq}}} = \frac{1}{L_{2}} \cdot (\frac{L_{2}}{L_{1}} + 1)\) Multiply both sides by \(L_{\mathrm{eq}}L_{1}L_{2}\) to solve for \(L_{\mathrm{eq}}\): \(L_{1}L_{2} = L_{\mathrm{eq}}(L_{2}+L_{1})\) Rearrange the equation to find \(L_{\mathrm{eq}}\): \(L_{\mathrm{eq}} = \frac{L_{1}L_{2}}{L_{1} + L_{2}}\) The equivalent inductance of two ideal inductors connected in parallel, with negligible mutual inductance, is given by: \(L_{\mathrm{eq}} = \frac{L_{1}L_{2}}{L_{1} + L_{2}}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A step-down transformer has a turns ratio of \(1 / 100 .\) An ac voltage of amplitude \(170 \mathrm{V}\) is applied to the primary. If the primary current amplitude is \(1.0 \mathrm{mA},\) what is the secondary current amplitude?
The primary coil of a transformer has 250 turns; the secondary coil has 1000 turns. An alternating current is sent through the primary coil. The emf in the primary is of amplitude \(16 \mathrm{V}\). What is the emf amplitude in the secondary? (tutorial: transformer)
The magnetic field between the poles of an electromagnet is \(2.6 \mathrm{T} .\) A coil of wire is placed in this region so that the field is parallel to the axis of the coil. The coil has electrical resistance \(25 \Omega,\) radius $1.8 \mathrm{cm},\( and length \)12.0 \mathrm{cm} .$ When the current supply to the electromagnet is shut off, the total charge that flows through the coil is \(9.0 \mathrm{mC} .\) How many turns are there in the coil?
The current in a \(0.080-\mathrm{H}\) solenoid increases from \(20.0 \mathrm{mA}\) to \(160.0 \mathrm{mA}\) in \(7.0 \mathrm{s} .\) Find the average emf in the solenoid during that time interval.
Two solenoids, of \(N_{1}\) and \(N_{2}\) turns respectively, are wound on the same form. They have the same length \(L\) and radius \(r\) (a) What is the mutual inductance of these two solenoids? (b) If an ac current $$I_{1}(t)=I_{\mathrm{m}} \sin \omega t$$ flows in solenoid $$1\left(N_{1} \text { turns }\right)$$ write an expression for the total flux through solenoid \(2 .\) (c) What is the maximum induced emf in solenoid \(2 ?[\text { Hint: Refer to Eq. }(20-7) .]\)
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free