Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A 1 ns pulse of electromagnetic waves would be 30cmlong.

(a) Consider such a pulse of 633 nmwavelength laser light. Find its central wave number and the range of wave numbers it comprises.

(b) Repeat part (a), but for a 1nspulse of 100 MHzradio waves.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The value of the wave number is9.93x106m-1and the range of the wave number is k1.67m-1.

(b) The value of the wave number is 20.9dm-1and the range of the wave number is k1.67m-1.

Step by step solution

01

Formula for expression for the uncertainty in the wave’s position and the relation between wave numbers.

The expression for the uncertainty in the wave’s position is given by,

xk12

The expression for the relation between the wave number k and λis given by,k=2πλ

02

Use the expression ΔxΔk≥12 and k=2πλ for calculation.

(a).

The wavelengthλof the pulse is6.33nm.

The length xof the electromagnetic wave is30cm.

The wavenumber is calculated as,

role="math" localid="1659761406782" k=2πλ=2π633nm=2π633nm10-9m1nm=9.93×106m-1

The range of the wavenumber is calculated as,

xk1230cm10-2m1cmk12k1.67m-1

Therefore, the value of the wave number is 9.93x106m-1and the range of the wave number is Δk1.67m-1.

03

Formula for the expression for the relation between the wavenumber and the wave equation of the light.

The expression for the relation between the wave numberkandλis given by,

k=2πλ

The expression for wave equation of light is given by,

c=λf

04

Use the expression k=2πλ and c=λf for calculation.

(b)

The frequency f of the pulse is 1Hz.

The expression for the wavenumber is evaluated as,

k=2πλ=2πc=2πfc

The value of wavenumber is calculated as,

k=2πfc=2π11ms3×108m/s=2π11ns1×10-9s1ns3×108m/s=20.9m-1

The range of the wavenumber is calculated as,

xk1230cm10-2m1cmk12k1.67m-1

Therefore, the value of the wave number is 20.9m-1and the range of the wave number is k1.67m-1

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Experiments effectively equivalent to the electron double slit have been conducted in different, novel ways, producing obvious maxima and minima. Often the point is stressed that the intensity is extremely low. Why is this fact emphasized so much? How low is low enough to make the point?

(a) What is the range of possible wavelengths for a neutron corresponding to a range of speeds from “thermal” at300K(see Exercise) to0.01c.(b) Repeat part (a), but with reference to an electron.(c) For this range of speeds, what range of dimensions D would reveal the wave nature of a neutron? Of an electron?

Because we have found no way to formulate quantum mechanics based on a single real wave function, we have a choice to make. In Section 4.3,it is said that our choice of using complex numbers is a conventional one. Show that the free-particle Schrodinger equation (4.8) is equivalent to two real equations involving two real functions, as follows:

-2λ2Ψ1(x,t)m=Ψ2(x,t)tand

-2λ2Ψ2(x,t)m=Ψ1(x,t)t

where Ψ(x,t)is by definition Ψ1(x,t)+iΨ2(x,t). How is the complex approach chosen in Section4.3more convenient than the alternative posed here?

Determine the Compton wavelength of the electron, defined to be the wavelength it would have if its momentum weremec.

In Exercise 45, the case is made that the position uncertainty for a typical macroscopic object is generally so much smaller than its actual physical dimensions that applying the uncertainty principle would be absurd. Here we gain same idea of how small an object would have♦ to be before quantum mechanics might rear its head. The density of aluminum is 2.7×103kg/m3, is typical of solids and liquids around us. Suppose we could narrow down the velocity of an aluminum sphere to within an uncertainty of1μmper decade. How small would it have to be for its position uncertainty to be at least as large as110%of its radius?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free