Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

All other things being equal, which would be more likely to exhibit its wave nature—a proton or an electron—and why? By making something unequal, how could you “compensate,” so as to make one as wavelike as the other?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The electron is more wavelike than the proton, in accordance with the de Broglie relation, although they both display the same wave properties if the electron moves around 2000 times more slowly than the proton.

Step by step solution

01

The wavelength of a particle

The wavelength of a particle is given byλ=hp=hmv .

02

Explanation

Because of the inverse connection between wavelength and momentum provided by the de-Broglie equation, tiny objects are often more likely to display wave-nature. The concept is that in order to notice the wave characteristics in measurements, the objects must have more strong wave characteristics, which is the case for tiny particles like the electron. However, the wavelength is so narrow and difficult to notice for large objects.

According to their mass ratios, the proton will have a momentum 2000 times greater than the electron if we assume that both the electron and the proton are travelling at the same speed. However, we may deduce that the wavelength of the proton will be 2000 smaller than the wavelength of the electron.

We return to the de-Broglie equation to find that the wavelength decreases with increasing velocity in order to account for the change in wave nature. As a result, both particles will exhibit the same wave characteristic whether the proton can move 2000 times slower than the electron or, conversely, if the electron can move 2000 times faster than the proton.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A particle is connected to a spring and undergoes one-dimensional motion.

(a) Write an expression for the total (kinetic plus potential) energy of the particle in terms of its position x. its mass m, its momentum p, and the force constantof the spring.

(b) Now treat the particle as a wave. Assume that the product of the uncertainties in position and momentum is governed by an uncertainty relationp.r12h. Also assume that because xis on average. the uncertaintyis roughly equal to a typical value of|x|. Similarly, assume thatp|p|. Eliminate pin favor of xin the energy expression.

(c) Find the minimum possible energy for the wave.

The position of a neutron in a nucleus is known within an uncertainty of -5x10-13 m. At what speeds might we expect to find it moving?

A free particle is represented by the plane wave functionψ(x,t)=Aexp[i(1.58×1012x-7.91×1016t)]where SIunits are understood. What are the particle’s momentum, Kinetic energy, and mass? (Note: In nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, we ignore mass/internal energy, so the frequency is related to kinetic energy alone.)

The energy of a particle of massbound by an unusual spring isβ/2m+bx4.

(a) Classically. it can have zero energy. Quantum mechanically, however, though bothx andpare "on average" zero, its energy cannot be zero. Why?

(b) Roughly speaking.Δxis a typical value of the particle's position. Making a reasonable assumption about a typical value of its momentum, find the particle's minimum possible energy.

To how small a region must an electron be confined for borderline relativistic speeds say0.05to become reasonably likely? On the basis of this, would you expect relativistic effects to be prominent for hydrogen's electron, which has an orbit radius near10-10m? For a lead atom "inner-shell" electron of orbit radius10-12m?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free