Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Classically and nonrelativistically, we say that the energyEof a massive free particle is just its kinetic energy. (a) With this assumption, show that the classical particle velocityvparticleis2E/p. (b) Show that this velocity and that of the matter wave differ by a factor of 2. (c) In reality, a massive object also has internal energy, no matter how slowly it moves, and its total energyEisγmc2, whereγ=1/1-(vparticle/c)2.Show thatvparticleispc2/Eand thatvwaveisc2/vparticleIs there anything wrong with itvwave? (The issue is discussed further in Chapter 6.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The classical particle velocity vparticleis2E/p has proved by relating kinetic energy and momentum.

b. The velocity and the matter-wave differ by a factor of 2 by relating wave velocity with the result of component a).

c. By relating wave velocity to particle velocity it is found that the value of particle velocity is distinct from the value of wave velocity.

Step by step solution

01

Concept Introduction

The kinetic energy of the particle in the classical or nonrelativistic picture isKE=12mvparticle2and for aparticle, in the relativistic approach, the kinetic energy can b expressed as KE=γmc2.

02

Ratio between kinetic energy and momentum(a)

We could derive the ratio between the kinetic energy (total energy of a free particle) and the momentumusing classicalreasoning.

KE=12mvparticle2

p=mvparticle

E=pvparticle2

vparticle=2Ep

03

Wave velocity(b)

The wave velocity is discovered to be,

vwave=Ep

As a result, when we compare this to the result of component (a), we can see that the two velocitiesdiffer by a factor oftwo.

04

Calculations for particle Velocity(c)

We can use the relativistic correction to repeat the particle velocity (vparticle) calculations that we did in part (a).

E=γvmc22Ωv2p=γvmvparticle

Ep=γvmc2γvmvparticle

vparticle=pc2E

This value of vparticleis still distinct from the value of vwavethat we previously discussed. We can substitute vwavefrom part (b), to relate the wave velocity to the particle velocity.

.vparticle=c2vwavevwave=c2vparticle

This velocity, known as the phase velocity, conveys no information, it can travel faster than the speed of light.

The group velocity, where the energy and momentum are carried through, is the wave velocity that is not allowed to have speeds larger than.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Generally speaking, why is the wave nature of matter so counterintuitive?

In Section 4.3, we claim that in analyzing electromagnetic waves, we could handle the fieldsandtogether with complex numbers. Show that if we define an "electromagnetic field"GE+icB, then the two of Maxwell's equations that linkEandB.(4-6c) and(4-6d) , become just one:

Gdl=ictGdA

Electromagnetic waves would have to obey this complex equation. Does this change of approach make EandB/or complex? (Remember how a complex number is defined.)

If a laser pulse is of short enough duration, it becomes rather superfluous to refer to its specific color. How short a duration must a light pulse be for its range of frequencies to cover the entire visible spectrum? (The visible spectrum covers frequencies of -4.5to7.5×1014Hz.)

Question: A classmate studies Figures 12 and 17, then claims that when a spot appears, its location simultaneously establishes the particle’s -component of momentum, according to the angle from center, and its position (i.e., at the spot). How do you answer this claim?

Question: Incandescent lightbulbs heat up a filament “white hot,” producing light of all wavelengths that has little to do with the filament’s composition. Gas vapor bulbs, such as sodium and mercury streetlights, produce colors that do depend on the gas in the bulb. Viewed with a diffraction grating (even a simple CD!), whereas the incandescent spectrum is continuous, that of a gas vapor (or fluorescent) bulb has characteristic lines. How is this indirect evidence of the wave nature of orbiting electrons?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free