Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The Moon orbits Earth at a radius of 3.84×108m. To do so as a classical particle. Its wavelength should be small. But small relative to what? Being a rough measure of the region where it is confined, the orbit radius is certainly a relevant dimension against which to compare the wavelength. Compare the two. Does the Moon indeed orbit as a classical particle? (localid="1659095974931" mEarth=5.98×1024kgand mmoon=7.35×1022kg)

Short Answer

Expert verified

The moon is unmistakably orbiting in the manner of a classical particle.

λmoon=8.84×10-60 m

Step by step solution

01

Step 1:Concept Introduction

To be treated as a classical particle, the wavelength of the orbiting moon must be modest in comparison to the orbiting radius, according to the problem statement. Will find the appropriate velocity of the moon using Newton's second law, and then apply the de-Broglie equation to find the associated wavelength.

Fc=Gmemmr2=mmv2rv=Gmer

02

Substituting formula.

v=(6.67×10-11m3kg1s2)×(5.98×1024 kg)3.84×108m=1.02×103m/s

λm=hmmvλm=6.63×10-34Js(7.35×1022kg)×(1.02×103 m/s)λm=8.84×10-60m

Because this is such a small value in comparison to the orbital radius, the moon is orbiting as a classical particle.

λmoon=8.84×10-60 m

Therefore, the moon is unmistakably orbiting in the manner of a classical particle.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: A classmate studies Figures 12 and 17, then claims that when a spot appears, its location simultaneously establishes the particle’s -component of momentum, according to the angle from center, and its position (i.e., at the spot). How do you answer this claim?

An electron moves along the x-axiswith a well-defined momentum of5×10-25kg.ms. Write an expression describing the matter wave associated with this electron. Include numerical values where appropriate.

In Exercise 45, the case is made that the position uncertainty for a typical macroscopic object is generally so much smaller than its actual physical dimensions that applying the uncertainty principle would be absurd. Here we gain same idea of how small an object would have♦ to be before quantum mechanics might rear its head. The density of aluminum is 2.7×103kg/m3, is typical of solids and liquids around us. Suppose we could narrow down the velocity of an aluminum sphere to within an uncertainty of1μmper decade. How small would it have to be for its position uncertainty to be at least as large as110%of its radius?

Question: When we refer to a “bound” particle, we usually mean one for which there is no probability of finding it outside some finite confines. Could a bound particle be perfectly dead stationary, meaning a well-defined velocity of zero? Why or why not?

Experiments effectively equivalent to the electron double slit have been conducted in different, novel ways, producing obvious maxima and minima. Often the point is stressed that the intensity is extremely low. Why is this fact emphasized so much? How low is low enough to make the point?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free