Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A photon scatters off of a free electron. (a) What is the maximum possible change in wavelength? (b) Suppose a photon scatters off of a free proton. What is the maximum possible change in wavelength now? (e) Which more clearly demonstrates the particle nature of electromagnetic radiation--collision with an electron or collision with a proton?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The maximum possible change in wavelength of the electron is4.85×10-3m .

(b) The maximum possible change in wavelength of the proton is2.646×10-15m .

(c) The collision with an electron more clearly demonstrates the particle nature of electromagnetic radiation.

Step by step solution

01

Significance of the change in the wavelength

The change in the wavelength is directly proportional to the Planck’s constant and the angle subtended by a particle. Moreover, the wavelength is inversely proportional to the light’s speed and the mass of an electron.

02

(a) Determination of the maximum possible change in the wavelength initially

During the scattering, the maximum wavelength change occurs at an angle of .

The equation of the maximum possible change in the wavelength of the electron is expressed as:

λ'-λ=hmeC(1-cosθ)

Here, role="math" localid="1657610341456" λ'-λis the maximum change in the wavelength, his the Planck’s constant, meis the mass of an electron and θis the angle subtended by the proton.

Substitute 6.63×10-34kg·m2/sforh,9.1×10-31kgforme,3×108m/sforcand180°

for θin the above equation.

role="math" localid="1657610242005" λ'-λ=6.63×10-34kg·m2/s9.1×10-31kg3×108m/s1-cos180°=6.63×10-34kg·m2/s2.73×10-22kg·m/s(1-(-1))=1.326×10-33kg·m2/s2.73×10-22kg·m/s=4.85×10-3m

Thus, the maximum possible change in wavelength of the electron is=4.85×10-3m .

03

(b) Determination of the maximum possible change in the wavelength finally

During the scattering, the maximum wavelength change occurs at an angle of180°.

The equation of the maximum possible change in the wavelength of the proton is expressed as:

λ'-λ=hmpc(1-cosθ)

Here, λ'-λis the maximum change in the wavelength, his the Planck’s constant, mpis the mass of an electron and θis the angle subtended by the proton.

Substitute 6.63×10-34kg·m2/sforh,1.67×10-27kgforme,3×108m/sforcand 180°

in the above equation.

λ'-λ=6.63×10-34kg·m2/s1.67×10-27kg3×108m/s1-cos180°=6.63×10-34kg·m2/s5.01×10-19kg·m/s(1-(-1))=1.326×10-33kg·m2/s5.01×10-19kg·m/s=2.646×10-15m

Thus, the maximum possible change in wavelength of the proton isrole="math" localid="1657610571650" 2.646×10-15m

04

(c) Determination of the particle nature of electromagnetic radiation

The collision with a particular electron more clearly demonstrates the particle nature of electromagnetic radiation as the wavelength change in noticeable. In the wavelength of the proton, there is an insignificant wavelength change. The photon in the x-ray band mainly interacts with other proton as a wave function and also the scattered protons also have a same type of wavelength.

Thus, the collision with an electron more clearly demonstrates the particle nature of electromagnetic radiation.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the Compton effect, we choose the electron to be at the origin and the initial photon's direction of motion to be in the+x-direction.

(a) We may also choose the xy-plane so that it contains the velocities of the outgoing electron and photon. Why? (b) The incoming photon's wavelengthλis assumed to be known. The unknowns after the collision are the outgoing photon's wavelength and direction,λ′, and θ,and the speed and direction of theelectron,ue,andϕ.With only three equationstwocomponents of momentum conservation and one of energy, we can't find all four. Equation(3−8)givesλ′in terms ofθ.Our lack of knowledge of θθ after the collision (without an experiment) is directly related to a lack of knowledge of something before the collision. What is it? (imagine the two objects are hard spheres.) (c) Is it reasonable to suppose that we could know this? Explain.

An electron moving to the left at 0.8c collides with an incoming photon moving to the right . After the collision, the electron is moving to the right at 0.6c and an outgoing photon moves to the left. What was the wavelength of the incoming photon?

When a beam of mono-energetic electrons is directed at a tungsten target, X-rays are produced with wavelengths no shorter than0.062nm . How fast are the electrons in the beam moving?

A sodium vapor light emits 10 Wof light energy. Its wavelength is 589 nm , and it speads in all directions. How many photons pass through your pupil. diameter 4 mm , in1if you stand 10 mfrom the light?

A bedrock topic in quantum mechanics is the uncertainty principle. It is discussed mostly for massive objects in Chapter 4, but the idea also applies to light: Increasing certainty in knowledge of photon position implies increasing uncertainty in knowledge of its momentum, and vice versa. A single-slit pattern that is developed (like the double-slit pattern of Section 3.6) one photon at a time provides a good example. Depicted in the accompanying figure, the pattern shows that pho tons emerging from a narrow slit are spreadall-over; a photon's x-component of momentum can be any value over a broad range and is thus uncertain. On the other hand, the x -coordinate of position of an emerging photon covers a fairly small range, for w is small. Using the single-slit diffractionformula =wsinθ , show that the range of likely values of px, which is roughly psinθ , is inversely proportional to the range w of likely position values. Thus, an inherent wave nature implies that the precisions with which the particle properties of position and momentum can be known are inversely proportional.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free