Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

You are an early 20th-century experimental physicist and do not know the value of Planck's constant. By a suitable plot of the following data, and using Einstein's explanation of the photoelectric effect (KE=Wϕ. where his not known), determine Planck's constant.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Planck's constanth=6.665×1034Js

Step by step solution

01

Concept  and  Formula  

Energy E=hfϕ

Here, E is the energy,f is the frequency and ϕis the work function.

E=eV0. Here,E is the kinetic energy, is the electronic charge and is the stopping potential.

c=Here, cis the speed of light, fis the frequency and λis the wavelength.

Electronic charge=1.602×1019C

Speed of light =2.99×108ms1 .

02

Evaluate energy

Energy is given as,

E=hfϕE=eV0eV0=hfϕV0=hfeϕe

Substituting c=

V0=hcϕeV0=hce×1λϕe

03

Plot the graph

Plotting a graph of1λ versus V0 using the given data,

04

Calculate Planck’s constant

From the graph, gradient =1244Vnmand intercept =2.2017V

As gradient =hce

1244=hceh=1244×er

Substitute values for e and c

h=1244Vnm×1.602×1019C2.99×108ms1h=1244×109Vm×1.602×1019C2.99×108ms1h=6.665×1034Js

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the Compton effect, we choose the electron to be at the origin and the initial photon's direction of motion to be in the+x-direction.

(a) We may also choose the xy-plane so that it contains the velocities of the outgoing electron and photon. Why? (b) The incoming photon's wavelengthλis assumed to be known. The unknowns after the collision are the outgoing photon's wavelength and direction,λ′, and θ,and the speed and direction of theelectron,ue,andϕ.With only three equationstwocomponents of momentum conservation and one of energy, we can't find all four. Equation(3−8)givesλ′in terms ofθ.Our lack of knowledge of θθ after the collision (without an experiment) is directly related to a lack of knowledge of something before the collision. What is it? (imagine the two objects are hard spheres.) (c) Is it reasonable to suppose that we could know this? Explain.

A photon scatters off of a free electron. (a) What is the maximum possible change in wavelength? (b) Suppose a photon scatters off of a free proton. What is the maximum possible change in wavelength now? (e) Which more clearly demonstrates the particle nature of electromagnetic radiation--collision with an electron or collision with a proton?

From equations (3-4) to (3-6) obtain equations (3.8). It is easiest to start by eliminating φ between equations (3-4) and (3-5) using cos2φ+sin2φ = 1 The electron speed u may then be eliminated between the remaining equations.

The charge on a piece of metal can be "watched" fairly easily by connecting it to an electroscope, a device with thin leaves that repel when a net charge is present You place a large excess negative charge on a piece of metal, then separately shine light source of two pure but different colors at it. The first source is extremely bright, but the electroscope shows no change in the net change. The second source is feeble, but the charge disappears. Appealing to as few fundamental claims as possible, explain to your friend what evidence this provides for the particle nature of light.

A photon and an object of mass m have the same momentum p.

  1. Assuming that the massive object is moving slowly, so that non-relativistic formulas are valid, find in terms of m , p and c the ratio of the massive object’s kinetic energy, and argue that it is small.
  2. Find the ratio found in part (a), but using relativistically correct fomulas for the massive object. (Note: E2=p2c2+m2c4may be helpful.)
  3. Show that the low-speed limit of the ratio of part (b) agrees with part (a) and that the high-speed limit is 1.
  4. Show that at very high speed, the kinetic energy of a massive object approaches .
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free