Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Exercise 39 gives the condition for resonant tunneling through two barriers separated by a space of width 2 s, expressed in terms of a factor βgiven in Exercise 30. (a) Suppose that in some system of units, k and α are both2π. Find two values of 2s that give resonant tunneling. What are these distances in terms of wavelengths ofψ? Is the term resonant tunneling appropriate?(b) Show that the condition has no solution if s = 0 and explain why this must be so. (c) If a classical particle wants to surmount a barrier without gaining energy, is adding a second barrier a good solution?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a) The values of the width of the separation between the two barriers are one-fourth and three-fourth of the wavelength so; the tunneling at separation one-half wavelength will be maximum as resonant conditions come into action.

b) Tunneling is not expected at s = 0, because at, s = 0, E > U0 . There will be just a single barrier in that case.

c) No, as you know that tunneling is not shown by classical particles. Moreover, quantum mechanics is not used for particles having macroscopic size. Hence, adding a second barrier will not be a good solution.

Step by step solution

01

 Given data

The value of the wave number and some factor αis given as 2π

The width of the separation between the two barriers is given as 2 s.

02

 Concept/Formula involved

The expression for factor βof the wave is given by,

β=tan-12αkk2-α2cothαL.....(1)

Where, α= any factors of the wave particle

k = the wave number and

L = the length of the barrier.

The expression for the wavelength of the particle,

λ=2πk.....(2)

Here, λis the wavelength of the particle.

The expression for the width of the separation between the two barriers, 2s=βk....(3)

Here, 2s is the width of the separation between the two barriers.

03

Step 3(a): Determining the width of the separation between two barriers

Substitute 2πfor αand k in equation (1).

β=tan-122π2π2π2-2π2coth2πL=tan-1

Simplify the above expression for β

β=π/2and3π/2

Substitute 2πfor k in equation (2)

λ=2π2π=1

Substitute 2πfor k and π/2for βin equation (3)

2s=π/22π=14

Substitute 2πfor k and 3π/2for βin equation (3).

2s=3π/22π=34

Therefore, the widths of the separation between the barriers are one-fourth and three-fourth of the wavelength. So, the tunneling at separation one-half wavelength will be maximum as resonant conditions come into action.

04

Step 4(b): Solution when s = 0 

From equation (3), you know that

2s=βk

Now, if s = 0, either β=0ork=, they both imply that argument of arctan in the equation given below is zero.

β=tan-12αkk2-α2cothαL

We can also ignore arctan and rewrite the formula as

2s=2α(k2-α2)cothαL

The above-mentioned equation is zero only if k is infinite, which will imply that E > U0.

Hence, tunneling is not expected at s = 0, there will be just a single barrier in that case.

05

Step 5(c): Tunneling of classical particle

As you know that tunneling is not shown by classical particles. Moreover, quantum mechanics is not used for particles having macroscopic size. Hence, adding a second barrier will not be a good solution.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

To obtain a rough estimate of the mean time required for uranium-238 to alpha-decay, let us approximate the combined electrostatic and strong nuclear potential energies by rectangular potential barrier half as high as the actual 35 Mev maximum potential energy. Alpha particles (mass 4 u) of 4.3 Mev kinetic energy are incident. Let us also assume that the barrier extends from the radius of nucleus, 7.4 fm to the point where the electrostatic potential drops to 4.3 Mev (i.e., the classically forbidden region). Because Uα(1/r), this point is 35/4.3 times the radius of the nucleus, the point at which U(r) is 35 Mev. (a) Use these crude approximations, the method suggested in Section 6.3, and the wide-barrier approximation to obtain a value for the time it takes to decay. (b) To gain some appreciation of the difficulties in a theoretical prediction, work the exercise “backward” Rather than assuming a value for U0, use the known value of the mean time to decay for uranium-238 and infer the corresponding value of U0, Retain all other assumptions. (c) Comment on the sensitivity of the decay time to the height of the potential barrier.

In the wide-barrier transmission probability of equation (6-18), the coefficient multiplying the exponential is often omitted. When is this justified, and why?

Exercise 39 gives a condition for resonant tunneling through two barriers separated by a space width of2s, expressed I terms of factorβgiven in exercise 30. Show that in the limit in which barrier widthL, this condition becomes exactly energy quantization condition (5.22) for finite well. Thus, resonant tunneling occurs at the quantized energies of intervening well.

The equations for Rand T in the E>U0barrier essentially the same as light through a transparent film. It is possible to fabricate a thin film that reflects no light. Is it possible to fabricate one that transmits no light? Why? Why not?

The plot below shows the variation of ω with k for electrons in a simple crystal. Where, if anywhere, does the group velocity exceed the phase velocity? (Sketching straight lines from the origin may help.) The trend indicated by a dashed curve is parabolic, but it is interrupted by a curious discontinuity, known as a band gap (see Chapter 10), where there are no allowed frequencies/energies. It turns out that the second derivative ofω with respect to k is inversely proportional to the effective mass of the electron. Argue that in this crystal, the effective mass is the same for most values of k, but that it is different for some values and in one region in a very strange way.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free