Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A beam of particles of energy incident upon a potential step ofU0=(3/4),is described by wave function:ฯˆinc(x)=eikx

The amplitude of the wave (related to the number of the incident per unit distance) is arbitrarily chosen as 1.

  1. Determine the reflected wave and wave inside the step by enforcing the required continuity conditions to obtain their (possibly complex) amplitudes.
  2. Verify the explicit calculation of the ratio of reflected probability density to the incident probability density agrees with equation (6-7).

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. Therefore, the reflected wave isฯˆrefl=13e-ikx and inside the step is ฯˆx>0=43eik'x.
  2. The verified value isR=19

Step by step solution

01

Concept involved

A particle is defined by the wave function:Be-2xforx<0andCe4xforx>0. For the given wave function to becontinuous, atx=0,B=C

02

Determining value of B and C

To the left of the step x<0solve as:

ฯˆ=ฯˆinc+ฯˆrefฯˆ=eikx+Be-ikx

To the right of the step x>0solve as:

ฯˆ=Ceik'x

Considermust be continuous at x=0solve as:

e0+Be0=Ce01+B=C

Consider dฯˆdxmust be continuous at x=0.

ike0-ikBe0=-ฮฑCe0k1-B=k'C

From the first and second conditions solve as:

k1-B=k'1+Bk-k'k+k'=2mEh-2mE-34Eh2mEh+2mE-34Eh

Divide by 2mEheverywhere:

B=1-1-341+1-34=1-121+12B=13

Putting this in C, we get C=43

03

Determining reflected wave and the wave inside step

(a)

Write the components of the function as:

ฯˆrefl=Be-ikx=13e-ikx

Also:

ฯˆx>0=Ceik'x=43eik'x

Here,k=2mEhandk'=2m14Eh.

04

Determining ratio of incident to reflected probability density

(b)

If it is given that, ฯˆinc=eikxand ฯˆref=Be-ikxsolve as:

ฯˆrefl2ฯˆinc2=13212=19

From equation (6-7), R=19

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: An electron bound in an atom can be modeled as residing in a finite well. Despite the walls. When many regularly spaced atoms are relatively close together as they are in a solid-all electrons occupy alltheatoms. Make a sketch of a plausible multi-atom potential energy and electron wave function.

A ball is thrown straight up at 25ms-1. Someone asks โ€œIgnoring air resistance. What is the probability of the ball tunneling to a height of1000m?โ€ Explain why this is not an example of tunneling as discussed in this chapter, even if the ball were replaced with a small fundamental particle. (The fact that the potential energy varies with position is not the whole answer-passing through nonrectangular barriers is still tunnelirl8.)

The potential energy barrier in field emission is not rectangular, but resembles a ramp, as shown in Figure 6.16. Here we compare tunnelling probability calculated by the crudest approximation to that calculated by a better one. In method 1, calculate T by treating the barrier as an actual ramp in which U - E is initiallyฯ•, but falls off with a slop of M. Use the formula given in Exercise 37. In method 2, the cruder one, assume a barrier whose height exceeds E by a constant ฯ•/2(the same as the average excess for the ramp) and whose width is the same as the distance the particle tunnels through the ramp. (a) Show that the ratio T1/T2 is e8mฯ•33hM . (b) Do the methods differ more when tunnelling probability is relatively high or relatively low?

Jump to JupiterThe gravitational potential energy of a 1kg object is plotted versus position from Earthโ€™s surface to the surface of Jupiter. Mostly it is due to the two planets.


Make the crude approximation that this is a rectangular barrier of widthm and approximate height of4X108j/kg. Your mass is 65 kg, and you launch your-self from Earth at an impressive 4 m/s. What is the probability that you can jump to Jupiter?

Given the same particle energy and barrier height and width, which would tunnel more readily: a proton or an electron? Is this consistent with the usual rule of thumb governing whether classical or non-classical behavior should prevail?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free