Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A beam of particles of energy E incident upon a potential step ofU0=(5/4)E is described by wave function:ψinc(x)=eikx

  1. Determine the reflected wave and wave inside the step by enforcing the required continuity conditions to obtain their (possibly complex) amplitudes.
  2. Verify the explicit calculation the ratio of reflected probability density to the incident probability density is 1.

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The reflected wave is given by,ψrefl=35-i45e-αxand the wave inside the step can be written as,ψx>0=85-i45e-αx
  2. The ratio of reflected probability density to the incident probability densityB*B=35+i4535-i45=1

Step by step solution

01

Concept involved

A particle is defined by the wave function: Be-2x for x<0andCe4x forx>0 . For the given wave function to becontinuous, atx=0,B=C

02

Calculation of B and C

To left of the step x<0as:

ψ=ψinc+ψrefψ=eikx+Be-ikx

To the right of the step x>0as:

ψ=Ce-αx

Her, ψmust be continuous at x=0.

e0+Be0=Ce01+B=C

Here, dψdx must be continuous at x=0.

ike0-ikBe0=-αCe0ik1-B=-αC

From first and second condition:

ik1-B=α1+Bik+αik-α=i2mEh+2m54E-Ehi2mEh-2m54E-Eh

Divide by √2mE/everywhere:

B=i+54-1i-54-1=i+12i-12B=35-i45

Substitute this in C, the equation obtained is:

C=85-i45

03

(a) Determining reflected wave and the wave

If,ψrefl=Be-αx

By putting value of B from Step 3 in the above-mentioned equation and solve:

ψrefl=35-i45e-αx

If, ψx>0=Ce-αx

By putting value of C from Step 3 in the above-mentioned equation solve as:

ψx>0=85-i45e-αx

Hence, the reflected wave is given by, ψrefl=35-i45e-αx and the wave inside the step can be written as, ψx>0=85-i45e-αx

04

(b) Ratio of reflected and incident probability density

The ratio of reflected and incident probability can be calculated by the following equation,

B*B=35+i4535-i45=1

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Why is the topic of normalization practically absent from Sections 6.1 and 6.2?

Given the situation of exercise 25, show that

(a) as Uo, reflection probability approaches 1 and

(b) as L0, the reflection probability approaches 0.

(c) Consider the limit in which the well becomes infinitely deep and infinitesimally narrow--- that is Uoand data-custom-editor="chemistry" L0but the product U0L is constant. (This delta well model approximates the effect of a narrow but strong attractive potential, such as that experienced by a free electron encountering a positive ion.) Show that reflection probability becomes:

R=[1+2h2EmUoL2]-1

As we learn in physical optics, thin-film interference can cause some wavelengths of light to be strongly reflected while others not reflected at all. Neglecting absorption all light has to go one way or the other, so wavelengths not reflected are strongly transmitted. (a) For a film, of thickness t surrounded by air, what wavelengths λ (while they are within the film) will be strongly transmitted? (b) What wavelengths (while they are “over” the barrier) of matter waves satisfies condition (6-14)? (c) Comment on the relationship between (a) and (b).

From equations (6-23) and (6-29) obtain the dispersion coefficient for matter waves (in vacuum), then show that probability density (6-35) follows from (6-28)

The potential energy barrier in field emission is not rectangular, but resembles a ramp, as shown in Figure 6.16. Here we compare tunnelling probability calculated by the crudest approximation to that calculated by a better one. In method 1, calculate T by treating the barrier as an actual ramp in which U - E is initiallyϕ, but falls off with a slop of M. Use the formula given in Exercise 37. In method 2, the cruder one, assume a barrier whose height exceeds E by a constant ϕ/2(the same as the average excess for the ramp) and whose width is the same as the distance the particle tunnels through the ramp. (a) Show that the ratio T1/T2 is e8mϕ33hM . (b) Do the methods differ more when tunnelling probability is relatively high or relatively low?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free