Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

In the E>Uopotential barrier, there should be no reflection when the incident wave is at one of the transmission resonances. Prove this by assuming that a beam of particles is incident at the first transmission resonance, E=Uo+(π2h2/2mL2), and combining continuity equations to show thatB=0. (Note: k’ is particularly simple in this special case, which should streamline your work.)

Short Answer

Expert verified

There should be no reflection when the incident wave is at one of the transmission resonances.

Step by step solution

01

Known condition:

Classically, the particle shouldn’t reflect. It should slow down between the barriers. But quantum mechanically, we apply the Schrödinger equation and get the solution to be of the form:e±ikx. So,

ψx<0(x)=Aeikx+Be-ikxψ0<x<L(x)=Ceik'x+De-ik'xψx>0(x)=Feikx

Here, α in second equation signifies the real nature.data-custom-editor="chemistry" ψ= Wave Functions, A,B,C,D,F are the arbitrary multiplicative constants.

02

Derivation

Applying boundary conditions for 0<x<L and x<0:

If, L= Width of potential barrier, k=2mE-Voh2and k'=2mEh2

ψx<00=ψ0<x<L0:Aeik0+Be-ik0=Ceik'0+De-ik,0A+B=C+D

Solve as:

dψx<0dx|x=0=dψ0<x<Ldx|x=0:ikAeik0-ikBe-ik0=ik'Ceik'0-ik'Deik'0kA-B=k'C-D

Now applying boundary conditions for 0<x<L and x>L:

ψ0<x<LL=ψx>0L:Ce-ik'L+De-ik'L=FeikL

Also.

dψ0<x<Ldx|x=L=dψx>0dx|x=L:ik'Ceik'L-Deik,L=ikFeikL

From the second condition:C=kk'A-B+Dput in first to obtain:

data-custom-editor="chemistry" C=k'A+B+kA-B2k'D=k'A+B-kA-B2k'

Substitute these values in the definition of reflection, the coefficient of reflection is given by:

R=sin2k'Lsin2k'L+4k'2k2k2-k'22

Now, substituting the values in the above equation,k=2mE-Voh2andk'=2mEh2

Hence,R=sin22mE+UoLhsin22mE+UoLh+4EUoEUo+1

Now, R is non-zero in general because the numerator contains sine term.

In order to consider no reflection, the numerator becomes zero and is equated to nπ, the condition is:

2mE-UohL=2mE-UohL=πOR

(n=1 for first transmission resonance)

E=Uo+π2h22mL2

Here, E= Kinetic energy, Uo= Potential energy, h= Modified Plank’s constant

E=Uo+π2h22mL2

This expression is not a quantization condition but it defines the transmission resonance condition such that it occurs only at certain energies no matter what incident energy is.

Hence, there should be no reflection when the incident wave is at one of the transmission resonances

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A beam of particles of energy incident upon a potential step ofU0=(3/4),is described by wave function:ψinc(x)=eikx

The amplitude of the wave (related to the number of the incident per unit distance) is arbitrarily chosen as 1.

  1. Determine the reflected wave and wave inside the step by enforcing the required continuity conditions to obtain their (possibly complex) amplitudes.
  2. Verify the explicit calculation of the ratio of reflected probability density to the incident probability density agrees with equation (6-7).

The plot below shows the variation of ω with k for electrons in a simple crystal. Where, if anywhere, does the group velocity exceed the phase velocity? (Sketching straight lines from the origin may help.) The trend indicated by a dashed curve is parabolic, but it is interrupted by a curious discontinuity, known as a band gap (see Chapter 10), where there are no allowed frequencies/energies. It turns out that the second derivative ofω with respect to k is inversely proportional to the effective mass of the electron. Argue that in this crystal, the effective mass is the same for most values of k, but that it is different for some values and in one region in a very strange way.

Exercise 39 gives a condition for resonant tunneling through two barriers separated by a space width of2s, expressed I terms of factorβgiven in exercise 30. Show that in the limit in which barrier widthL, this condition becomes exactly energy quantization condition (5.22) for finite well. Thus, resonant tunneling occurs at the quantized energies of intervening well.

In the wide-barrier transmission probability of equation (6-18), the coefficient multiplying the exponential is often omitted. When is this justified, and why?

Verify that the reflection and transmission probabilities given in equation (6-7) add to 1.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free