Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Your friends ask: “Why is there an exclusion principle?” Explain in the simplest terms.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The two electrons cannot have all quantum numbers the same including spin, and cannot be in the same one-electron states.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction.

If a system of particles comprises electrons or a system of protons, then the particles are said to be identical when interchanging any of the two particles of the same kind does not change anything about the system. It means the magnitude-squared of the wave function, which gives the probability density, must remain the same when the coordinates of any two electrons are interchanged.

If the wave function involves a pair of particles each in one of two different one-electron states, interchanging the particles (putting each in the state of the other) and doing it again multiplies the wave function with any spin included. This is possible only if a single exchange of particles multiples the wave function or by or.

For electrons, and other particles with half-integer spins, interchanging the quantum numbers of the two electrons always multiplies the wave function.

02

for electrons and other particles with half-integer spin.

Symbolically, changing the quantum numbers of the two electrons must change the sign,

ψn,n'(rI2r2)=ψn',n(rI2r2)

Here, denotes the first set of one-electron quantum number and n'the second electron’s set of quantum numbers. But if the two electrons have all the same quantum numbers, the wave function becomes role="math" localid="1655379141692" ψn,n(r1r2)and the requirements that exchanging quantum numbers,

ψn,n'(r1,r2)=-ψn.n(r1,r2)

This requires the impossible condition that ψn,n(r1r2)is identically zero.

Conclusion: Therefore, The two electrons cannot have all quantum numbers the same including spin, and cannot be in the same one-electron states.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: Show that the frequency at which an electron’s intrinsic magnetic dipole moment would process in a magnetic field is given by ωeBme. Calculate the frequency for a field of 1.0 T.

A hydrogen atom in its ground state is subjected to an external magnetic field of 1.0 T. What is the energy difference between the spin-up and spin-down states?

A lithium atom has three electrons. These occupy individual particle states corresponding to the sets of four quantum numbers given by .

(n,l,ml,mj)=(1,0,0,+12),(1,0,0,-12)and(2,0,0,+12)

Using ψ1,0,0(rj),ψ1,0,0(rj),andψ2,0,0(rj) to represent the individual-particle states when occupied by particlej . Apply the Slater determinant discussed in Exercise 42 to find an expression for an antisymmetric multiparticle state. Your answer should be sums of terms like .

ψ1,0,0(r1),ψ1,0,0(r2),andψ2,0,0(r3)

Figureshows the Stern-Gerlach apparatus. It reveals that spin-12particles have just two possible spin states. Assume that when these two beams are separated inside the channel (though still near its centreline). we can choose to block one or the other for study. Now a second such apparatus is added after the first. Their channels are aligned. But the second one is rotated about the-axis by an angle \(\phi\) from the first. Suppose we block the spin-down beam in the first apparatus, allowing only the spin-up beam into the second. There is no wave function for spin. but we can still talk of a probability amplitude, which we square to give a probability. After the first apparatus' spin-up beam passes through the second apparatus, the probability amplitude iscos(ϕ/2)2nd+sin(ϕ/2)2ndwhere the arrows indicate the two possible findings for spin in the second apparatus.

(a) What is the probability of finding the particle spin up in the second apparatus? Of finding it spin down? Argue that these probabilities make sense individually for representative values ofϕand their sum is also sensible.

(b) By contrasting this spin probability amplitude with a spatial probability amplitude. Such asψ(x)=Aete2. Argue that although the arbitrariness ofϕgives the spin cases an infinite number of solves. it is still justified to refer to it as a "two-state system," while the spatial case is an infinite-state system.

In its ground state, nitrogen's 2p electrons interact to produce jT=32. Given Hund's rule, how might the orbit at angular momenta of these three electrons combine?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free