Chapter 8: Q75E (page 344)
Using to eliminate L - S. as wellas , obtain equation (8- 32 )from the equation that precedes it.
Short Answer
answer is
Chapter 8: Q75E (page 344)
Using to eliminate L - S. as wellas , obtain equation (8- 32 )from the equation that precedes it.
answer is
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeWhether adding spins to get total spin, spin and orbit to get total angular momentum, or total angular momenta to get a "grand total" angular momentum, addition rules are always the same: Given and . Where is an angular momentum (orbital. spin. or total) and a quantum number. the total is , where may take on any value between and in integral steps: and for each value of . where may take on any ofI possible values in integral steps from for Since separately there would be possible values for and I for . the total number of stales should be . Prove it: that is, show that the sum of the values for over all the allowed values for is . (Note: Here we prove in general what we verified in Example for the specialcase .)
Exercise 44 gives an antisymmetric multiparticle state for two particles in a box with opposite spins. Another antisymmetric state with spins opposite and the same quantum numbers is
Refer to these states as 1 and 11. We have tended to characterize exchange symmetry as to whether the state's sign changes when we swap particle labels. but we could achieve the same result by instead swapping the particles' stares, specifically theandin equation (8-22). In this exercise. we look at swapping only parts of the state-spatial or spin.
(a) What is the exchange symmetric-symmetric (unchanged). antisymmetric (switching sign). or neither-of multiparticle states 1 and Itwith respect to swapping spatial states alone?
(b) Answer the same question. but with respect to swapping spin states/arrows alone.
(c) Show that the algebraic sum of states I and II may be written
Where the left arrow in any couple represents the spin of particle 1 and the right arrow that of particle?
(d) Answer the same questions as in parts (a) and (b), but for this algebraic sum.
(e) ls the sum of states I and 11 still antisymmetric if we swap the particles' total-spatial plus spin-states?
(f) if the two particles repel each other, would any of the three multiparticle states-l. II. and the sum-be preferred?
Explain.
The electron is known to have a radius no larger than . If actually produced by circulating mass, its intrinsic angular momentum of roughlywould imply very high speed, even if all that mass were as far from the axis as possible.
(a) Using simply(from |r × p|) for the angular momentum of a mass at radius r, obtain a rough value of p and show that it would imply a highly relativistic speed.
(b) At such speeds,andcombine to give(just as for the speedy photon). How does this energy compare with the known internal energy of the electron?
Imagine two indistinguishable particles that share an attraction. All other things being equal, would you expect their multiparticle spatial state to be symmetric, ant symmetric, or neither? Explain.
Question: Lithium is chemically reactive. What if electrons were spin instead of spin. What value of Z would result in an elements reactive in roughly the same way as lithium? What if electrons were instead spin-1?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.