Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

All other things being equal, shouldthe spin-orbit interaction be a larger or smaller effect in hydrogen as increases? Justify your answer

Short Answer

Expert verified

Therefore, the interaction energy is proportional ton-6 , the spin-orbit interaction gets smaller as n increases in hydrogen

Step by step solution

01

Given data

Effect in hydrogen over n increment

02

Concept of spin orbit interaction energy

The interaction energy U between the spin dipole vector s and magnetic field due to the proton that the electron sees BLis, U=-μs.BL.

Hereμs represents spin dipole moment of electron andBL represents magnetic field due to the proton that the electron

03

Step 3:Find the equation for the interaction energy, magnetic field, and allowed radii

In order to determine whether the spin-orbit interaction gets bigger or smaller in hydrogen as n increases, equation for the interaction energy, magnetic field, and allowed radii are needed.

The interaction energy U between the spin dipole vectorand magnetic field due to the proton that the electron seesBLis,. U=-μs.BL ……. (1)

The magnetic field B that the electron sees from the proton is:

B=μ0e4πmer3L .……. (2)

Here μ0 is the permeability of free space, e is the charge on the electron, m is the mass of the electron, r is the distance of the electron from the proton, and L is the angular momentum vector of the proton.

The Bohr model can be used to get an approximation for the allowable radiiof the electron from the proton is,rn=aen2. ……. (3)

Here a0 is being the Bohr radius, and n being the principal quantum number.

04

Determine the effect on spin-orbit interaction in hydrogen as  n  increases 

Substitute the value offrom equation (2) to equation (1).

U=-μs·BL=μs·μ0e4πmer3L=μ0e4πmer3μs·L

Substitute the value of r from equation (3) to above equation.

U=-μ0ee4πmer3μs.L=-μ0e24πmea0n23μs.L=-μ0e24πmea03n6μs.L

Therefore, the interaction energy is proportional to n-6, the spin-orbit interaction gets smaller as n increases in hydrogen.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Exercise 45 refers to state I and II and put their algebraic sum in a simple form. (a) Determine algebraic difference of state I and state II.

(b) Determine whether after swapping spatial state and spin state separately, the algebraic difference of state I and state II is symmetric, antisymmetric or neither, and to check whether the algebraic difference becomes antisymmetric after swapping spatial and spin states both.

Whether a neutral whole atom behaves as bosons or a fermion is independent of Z, instead depending entirely on the number of the neutrons in its nucleus. Why? What is it about this number that determines whether the atom is a boson or a fermion?

Exercise 44 gives an antisymmetric multiparticle state for two particles in a box with opposite spins. Another antisymmetric state with spins opposite and the same quantum numbers is ψn(x1)n2(x2)ψnn(x1)ψn(x2)

Refer to these states as 1 and 11. We have tended to characterize exchange symmetry as to whether the state's sign changes when we swap particle labels. but we could achieve the same result by instead swapping the particles' stares, specifically theandin equation (8-22). In this exercise. we look at swapping only parts of the state-spatial or spin.

(a) What is the exchange symmetric-symmetric (unchanged). antisymmetric (switching sign). or neither-of multiparticle states 1 and Itwith respect to swapping spatial states alone?

(b) Answer the same question. but with respect to swapping spin states/arrows alone.

(c) Show that the algebraic sum of states I and II may be written(ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2))(+)

Where the left arrow in any couple represents the spin of particle 1 and the right arrow that of particle?

(d) Answer the same questions as in parts (a) and (b), but for this algebraic sum.

(e) ls the sum of states I and 11 still antisymmetric if we swap the particles' total-spatial plus spin-states?


(f) if the two particles repel each other, would any of the three multiparticle states-l. II. and the sum-be preferred?

Explain.

Determine the electronic configuration for phosphorus, germanium and cesium.

Using the general rule for adding angular momenta discussed in Section 8.7 and further in Exercise 66, Find the allowed values ofjTfor three spin 12 fermions. First add two, then add the third.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free