Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The neutron comprises multiple charged quarks. Can a particle that is electrically neutral but really composed of charged constituents have a magnetic dipole moment? Explain your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified

Yes, an electrically neutral particle composed of charged constituents has a magnetic dipole moment.

Step by step solution

01

Explanation.

Each proton and each neutron contain three quarks. A quark is a fast-moving point of energy. There are several varieties of quarks. Protons and neutrons are composed of two types: up quarks and down quarks.

For instance, the net charge of the counter circulating oppositely charged particle is zero, but they constituent a current. Thus, individual charged particles could have charges added to zero.

02

Due to the spin.

The combinations of the different spins forming their total spin do not add to zero. Due to this spin, charged particles constitute magnetic dipole moments.

Conclusion: Yes, an electrically neutral particle composed of charged constituents has a magnetic dipole moment.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Angular momenta J1and J2interact so that they obey the strict quantum mechanical rules for angular momentum addition. If J1=1and J2=32what angles between J1and J2 allowed?

The angles between S and ฮผSand between L and ฮผLare 180o. What is the angle between J and ฮผJ in a2p32state of hydrogen?

The total-spin singlet state for two electrons has one spin up and one down, but one of the triplet states does. too. What is the difference?

Here we consider adding two electrons to two "atoms," represented as finite wells. and investigate when the exclusion principle must be taken into account. In the accompanying figure, diagram (a) shows the four lowest-energy wave functions for a double finite well that represents atoms close together. To yield the lowest energy. the first electron added to this system must have wave function Aand is shared equally between the atoms. The second would al so have function Aand be equally shared. but it would have to be opposite spin. A third would have function B. Now consider atoms far a part diagram(b) shows, the bumps do not extend much beyond the atoms - they don't overlap-and functions Aand Bapproach equal energy, as do functions Cand D. Wave functionsAandBin diagram (b) describe essentially identical shapes in the right well. while being opposite in the left well. Because they are of equal energy. sums or differences ofandare now a valid alternative. An electron in a sum or difference would have the same energy as in either alone, so it would be just as "happy" inrole="math" localid="1659956864834" A,B,A+B, orA- B. Argue that in this spread-out situation, electrons can be put in one atom without violating the exclusion principle. no matter what states electrons occupy in the other atom.

Two particles in a box have a total energy 5ฯ€2โ„2/2mL2.

(a) Which states are occupied?

(b) Make a sketch ofP5(x1,x2)versusx1for points along the linex2=x1.

(c) Make a similar sketch ofPA(x1,x2).

(d) Repeat parts (b) and (c) but for points on the linex2=Lโˆ’x1

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free