Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Consider Z=19potassium. As a rough approximation assume that each of itsn=1electron s orbits 19 pro. tons and half an electron-that is, on average, half its fellown=1electron. Assume that each of itsn=2electrons orbits 19 protons, two Is electrons. and half of the seven othern=2electrons. Continue the process, assuming that electrons at eachorbit a correspondingly reduced positive charge. (At each, an electron also orbits some of the electron clouds of higher. but we ignore this in our rough approximation.)

(a) Calculate in terms ofa0the orbit radii of hydrogenlike atoms of these effective Z,

(b) The radius of potassium is often quoted at around0.22nm. In view of this, are yourn=1throughn=3radii reasonable?

(c) About how many more protons would have to be "unscreened" to then=4electron to agree with the quoted radius of potassium? Considering the shape of its orbit, should potassium'sn=4electron orbit entirely outside all the lower-electrons?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a)r1=0.054a0,r2=0.3a0,r3=1.64a0,r4=16a0

(b) The resultant answer is yes.

(c) The resultant answer is no.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

n=1,2,3,4For the electron in potassium.

02

Concept of Atomic radii

Expression for atomic radiirnis given by,rn=n2a0Z

Where,Zrepresents number of protons,represents principal quantum number anda0represents Bohr radius.

03

Determine the number of electrons

For the n=1 electrons, if they orbit the 19 protons in the potassium nucleus and half of the other n=1 electron, the effective Z that the electron would see would be 18.5, since 19-0.5=18.5. That can then be used in the radii equation, along with n being 1:

r1=(1)2a0(18.5)r1=0.054a0

For the n=2 electrons, if they orbit the 19 protons in the potassium nucleus, both 1 s electrons, and half of the seven others n=2 electrons, the effective Z that the electron would see would be 13.5 (since 19-2 -3.5=18.5). that can then be used in the radii equation, along with n being 2:

r2=(2)2a0(13.5)r2=0.296a0

For the n=3 electrons, if they orbit the 19 protons in the potassium nucleus, both 1s electrons, all eight of the n=2 electrons, and half of the seven other electrons, the effective that the electron would see would be 5.5 (since 19-2-8-3.5=5.5 ). that can then be used in the radii equation, along with n being 3:

r3=(3)2a0(5.5)r3=1.636a0

For the n=4 electron, if it orbits the 19 protons in the potassium nucleus, both 1s electrons, all eight of the n=2 electrons, and all eight of then=3 electrons, the effective that the electron would see would be 1 (since 19-2-8-8=1). That can then be used in the radii equation, along with n being 4:

r4=(4)2a0Ir4=16a0

04

Determine the radii

(b)

Calculate the radii

r1=0.054a00.0529nma0r1=2.86×10-3nmr2=0.3a00.0529nma0r2=1.59×10-2nm

Similarly, calculate further:

r3=1.64a00.0529nma0r3=8.67×10-2nm

05

Determine the equation

(c)

The atomic orbit radius equation can be used to estimate the effective Z that the valence electron sees, using 0.22nmfor the rnfor the n and0.0529nm for thea0 , after solving for Z :

Z=n2a0rnZ=(4)2(0.0529nm)(0.22nm)Z=3.85

So since in the valence electron orbits an effective Z of 1 in the original model, and it would need to orbit an effective Z of 3.85 based just on the experimental radius, there would need to be 3.8 more protons be "unscreened". The valence electron of potassium is in the s-shell, and consequently will have a roughly elliptical orbit. Therefore, it will spend part of its time near the nucleus, inside the orbits of the lower n electrons

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Imagine two indistinguishable particles that share an attraction. All other things being equal, would you expect their multiparticle spatial state to be symmetric, ant symmetric, or neither? Explain.

The electron is known to have a radius no larger than 1018m. If actually produced by circulating mass, its intrinsic angular momentum of roughlywould imply very high speed, even if all that mass were as far from the axis as possible.

(a) Using simplyrp(from |r × p|) for the angular momentum of a mass at radius r, obtain a rough value of p and show that it would imply a highly relativistic speed.

(b) At such speeds,E=γmc2andp=γmucombine to giveEpc(just as for the speedy photon). How does this energy compare with the known internal energy of the electron?

The spin-orbit interaction splits the hydrogen 4f state into many.

(a)Identity these states and rank them in order of increasing energy.

(b)If a weak external magnetic field were now introduced (weak enough that it does not disturb the spin-orbit coupling). Into how many different energies would each of these states be split?

A Simple Model: The multielectron atom is unsolvable, but simple models go a long way. Section7.8gives energies and orbit radii forone-electron/hydrogenlike atoms. Let us see how useful these are by considering lithium.

(a) Treat one of lithium'sn=1electrons as a single electron in a one-electron atom ofrole="math" localid="1659948261120" Z=3. Find the energy and orbit radius.

(b) The othern=1electron being in the same spatial state. must have the same energy and radius, but we must account for the repulsion between these electrons. Assuming they are roughly one orbit diameter apart, what repulsive energy would they share, and if each claims half this energy. what would be the energies of these two electrons?

(c) Approximately what charge does lithium's lone valence electron orbit, and what radius and energy would it have?

(d) Is in reasonable to dismiss the role of then=1electrons in chemical reactions?

(e) The actual energies of lithium's electrons are about-98eV(twice, of course) and-5.4eV. How good is the model?

(f) Why should the model's prediction for the valence electron's energy differ in the direction it does from the actual value?

Two particles in a box occupy the n=1andn'=2individual-particle states. Given that the normalization constant is the same as in Example8.2(see Exercise 36), calculate for both the symmetric and antisymmetric states the probability that both particles would be found in the left side of the box (i.e., between 0 and13L)?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free