Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A Simple Model: The multielectron atom is unsolvable, but simple models go a long way. Section7.8gives energies and orbit radii forone-electron/hydrogenlike atoms. Let us see how useful these are by considering lithium.

(a) Treat one of lithium'sn=1electrons as a single electron in a one-electron atom ofrole="math" localid="1659948261120" Z=3. Find the energy and orbit radius.

(b) The othern=1electron being in the same spatial state. must have the same energy and radius, but we must account for the repulsion between these electrons. Assuming they are roughly one orbit diameter apart, what repulsive energy would they share, and if each claims half this energy. what would be the energies of these two electrons?

(c) Approximately what charge does lithium's lone valence electron orbit, and what radius and energy would it have?

(d) Is in reasonable to dismiss the role of then=1electrons in chemical reactions?

(e) The actual energies of lithium's electrons are about-98eV(twice, of course) and-5.4eV. How good is the model?

(f) Why should the model's prediction for the valence electron's energy differ in the direction it does from the actual value?

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The resultant answer is1.76×10-11m

(b) The resultant answer is-101.6eV

(c) The resultant answer isr2=2.1×10-10m

(d) The resultant answer is explained.

(e) The resultant answer is explained.

(f) The resultant answer is explained.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

Hydrogen like atom, atomic number, Z=3, Bohr radius, a0=5.29×10-11m.

02

Concept of Atomic radii

Expression for atomic radiirnis given by,rn=n2a0Z

Where,Z represents number of protons, nrepresents principal quantum number anda0represents Bohr radius.

03

Determine the energy and radius of the orbit

(a)

The energy of the electron in first orbit

En=(-13.6eV)Zn2E1=(-13.6eV)312E1=-122eV

The radius of the orbit of the electron is,

rn=n2a0Zr1=(1)25.29×10-11m(3)r1=1.76×10-11m

04

Determine the electric potential between the electrons

(b)

The electric potential between two electron charges

U=14πε0q1q2rU=14π8.85×10-12c2N×m2-1.6×10-19C23.52×10-11mU=6.54×10-18J=6.54×10-18J1eV1.6×10-19JU=40.87eV

If half of potential energy added to both of the electron's energy, the new electron energy become

E1'=E1+U2E1'=(-122eV)+(40.87eV)2E1'=-101.6eV

05

Determine the energy of the electrons

(c)

On lithium has one electron on second orbit, so the charge of valance electron orbit of lithium is equal to the charge of one electron.

The charge of valance electron orbit,Qvalence orbit=-1.6×10-19C

The energy for lithium's valence electron is

En=(-13.6eV)Zn2E2=(-13.6eV)122E2=-3.4eV

The radius of the orbit for lithium's valence electron is

rn=n2a0Zr2=(2)25.29×10-11m(1)r2=2.1×10-10m

06

Determine the function

(d)

The inner orbit electrons are more closely to the neutron so they likely to experience quite high binding energy. This high binding force ceases them to participate in chemical reaction directly through exchanging or sharing. But do play a part in altering the energy and orbit radius of the valence electron due to their shielding of the nucleus. And that does affect the kind of reactions that the valence electron participates in.

07

Determine the function

(e)

Actual energy of lithium's 1s electron is -98eV, but the model predicts the energy approx. -102eV, On the other hand lithium's second orbit electron has energy-5.4eV but the model predicts -3.4eV. Percentage of error in predicting second orbit electron is very large. So, the model is good in predicting energy of smaller orbit's electron, but not good for higher orbit's electron.

08

Determine the function

(f)

The valence electrons predicted energy being less negative than the actual energy can be attributed to incomplete shielding of the nucleus by the 1s electrons. If the 1s electrons aren't completely efficient at using their charge of to-2 shield the charge on the nucleus of +3 the valence electron will see a higher effective charge on the nucleus. Consequently, the Z used in equation En=(-13.6eV)Zn2to determine the energy of the electron would be higher, leading to a greater negative energy.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: In classical electromagnetism, the simplest magnetic dipole is a circular current loop, which behaves in a magnetic field just as an electric dipole does in an electric field. Both experience torques and thus have orientation energies -p.Eand-μ·B.(a) The designation "orientation energy" can be misleading. Of the four cases shown in Figure 8.4 in which would work have to be done to move the dipole horizontally without reorienting it? Briefly explain. (b) In the magnetic case, using B and u for the magnitudes of the field and the dipole moment, respectively, how much work would be required to move the dipole a distance dx to the left? (c) Having shown that a rate of change of the "orientation energy'' can give a force, now consider equation (8-4). Assuming that B and are general, write-μ·B.in component form. Then, noting thatis not a function of position, take the negative gradient. (d) Now referring to the specific magnetic field pictured in Figure 8.3 which term of your part (c) result can be discarded immediately? (e) Assuming thatandvary periodically at a high rate due to precession about the z-axis what else may be discarded as averaging to 0? (f) Finally, argue that what you have left reduces to equation (8-5).

Question: Solving (or attempting to solve!) a 4-electron problem is not twice as hard as solving a 2-electrons problem. Would you guess it to be more or less than twice as hard? Why?

Question: Bearing in mind its limiting cases of 1 and 2 mentioned in section 8.8, how would you describe the significance of the Lande g-factor

Using f2=L2+S2+2L-Sto eliminate L - S. as wellas L=l(l+1)h,S=s(s+1)andj(j+1)h, obtain equation (8- 32 )from the equation that precedes it.

Question: Lithium is chemically reactive. What if electrons were spin 32instead of spin12. What value of Z would result in an elements reactive in roughly the same way as lithium? What if electrons were instead spin-1?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free