Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A lithium atom has three electrons. These occupy individual particle states corresponding to the sets of four quantum numbers given by .

(n,l,ml,mj)=(1,0,0,+12),(1,0,0,-12)and(2,0,0,+12)

Using ψ1,0,0(rj),ψ1,0,0(rj),andψ2,0,0(rj) to represent the individual-particle states when occupied by particlej . Apply the Slater determinant discussed in Exercise 42 to find an expression for an antisymmetric multiparticle state. Your answer should be sums of terms like .

ψ1,0,0(r1),ψ1,0,0(r2),andψ2,0,0(r3)

Short Answer

Expert verified

The expression for an antisymmetric multiparticle state is,

ψ1,0,0r1ψ1,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3-ψ1,0,0r1ψ2,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3-ψ1,0,0r1ψ1,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3+ψ1,0,0r1ψ2,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3+ψ2,0,0r1ψ1,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3-ψ2,0,0r1ψ2,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3

Step by step solution

01

Significance of the Slater determinant:

The Slater determinant mainly describes a multi-fermionic system’s wave function. This determinant mainly satisfies the anti-symmetry requirements.

02

Determination of the expression for an antisymmetric multiparticle state:

As there are three individual states of particle that are represented by the function ψ1,0,0rjψ1,0,0rj,ψ2,0,0rj. For the j particle, the Slater determinant consists of three columns in which one column is for each state of the individual particle. There are also three types of electrons, hence the Slater determinant will consist of three rows which are j=3 to j=1 as one row has each electron.

With the help of the previous analysis, the next possible step is implementing Slater determinant and the equation is expressed as:

ψ1,0,0r1ψ1,0,0r1ψ2,0,0r1ψ1,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r2ψ2,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3ψ1,0,0r3ψ2,0,0r3

The above determinant mainly represents the three-electron antisymmetric state, let it be denoted by ψ-r1,r2,r3. Hence, expanding the above determinant with the help of the first row, the above equation can be expressed as:

ψ-r1,r2,r3=ψ1,0,0r1ψ1,0,0r2ψ2,0,0r3-ψ2,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3-ψ1,0,0r1ψ1,0,0r2ψ2,0,0r3-ψ2,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3+ψ2,0,0r1ψ1,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3-ψ1,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3

The previous result can be expanded for writing the final answer.

ψ-r1,r2,r3=ψ1,0,0r1ψ1,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3-ψ1,0,0r1ψ2,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3-ψ1,0,0r1ψ1,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3+ψ1,0,0r1ψ2,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3+ψ2,0,0r1ψ1,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3-ψ2,0,0r1ψ2,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3

Thus, the expression for an antisymmetric multiparticle state is .

ψ1,0,0r1ψ1,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3-ψ1,0,0r1ψ2,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3-ψ1,0,0r1ψ1,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3+ψ1,0,0r1ψ2,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3+ψ2,0,0r1ψ1,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3-ψ2,0,0r1ψ2,0,0r2ψ1,0,0r3

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Question: What if electrons were spin32 instead of spin 12. What would be Z for the first noble gas?

Figureshows the Stern-Gerlach apparatus. It reveals that spin-12particles have just two possible spin states. Assume that when these two beams are separated inside the channel (though still near its centreline). we can choose to block one or the other for study. Now a second such apparatus is added after the first. Their channels are aligned. But the second one is rotated about the-axis by an angle \(\phi\) from the first. Suppose we block the spin-down beam in the first apparatus, allowing only the spin-up beam into the second. There is no wave function for spin. but we can still talk of a probability amplitude, which we square to give a probability. After the first apparatus' spin-up beam passes through the second apparatus, the probability amplitude iscos(ϕ/2)2nd+sin(ϕ/2)2ndwhere the arrows indicate the two possible findings for spin in the second apparatus.

(a) What is the probability of finding the particle spin up in the second apparatus? Of finding it spin down? Argue that these probabilities make sense individually for representative values ofϕand their sum is also sensible.

(b) By contrasting this spin probability amplitude with a spatial probability amplitude. Such asψ(x)=Aete2. Argue that although the arbitrariness ofϕgives the spin cases an infinite number of solves. it is still justified to refer to it as a "two-state system," while the spatial case is an infinite-state system.

Question: Concisely, why is the table periodic?

Question: Huge tables of characteristic X-rays start at lithium. Why not hydrogen or helium?

Compare and contrast the angular momentum and magnetic moment related to orbital motion with those that are intrinsic.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free