Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Exercise 44 gives an antisymmetric multiparticle state for two particles in a box with opposite spins. Another antisymmetric state with spins opposite and the same quantum numbers is ψn(x1)n2(x2)ψnn(x1)ψn(x2)

Refer to these states as 1 and 11. We have tended to characterize exchange symmetry as to whether the state's sign changes when we swap particle labels. but we could achieve the same result by instead swapping the particles' stares, specifically theandin equation (8-22). In this exercise. we look at swapping only parts of the state-spatial or spin.

(a) What is the exchange symmetric-symmetric (unchanged). antisymmetric (switching sign). or neither-of multiparticle states 1 and Itwith respect to swapping spatial states alone?

(b) Answer the same question. but with respect to swapping spin states/arrows alone.

(c) Show that the algebraic sum of states I and II may be written(ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2))(+)

Where the left arrow in any couple represents the spin of particle 1 and the right arrow that of particle?

(d) Answer the same questions as in parts (a) and (b), but for this algebraic sum.

(e) ls the sum of states I and 11 still antisymmetric if we swap the particles' total-spatial plus spin-states?


(f) if the two particles repel each other, would any of the three multiparticle states-l. II. and the sum-be preferred?

Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) The resultant answer is Neither.

(b) The resultant answer is Neither.

(c) The resultant answer is ψsum=[ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)](+).

(d) The resultant answer is antisymmetric, symmetric.

(e) The resultant answer is yes; algebraic sum is antisymmetric.

(f) The resultant answer is sum is preferred.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

The two combinations of spin and spatial wave.

02

Concept of Determinant

The energy of electron in nth-orbit:E=Z2(13.6eVn2)

The energy KE which an object of charge q gains by passing through the potential differenceΔVis KE=qΔV.

03

Determine the function

(a)

The two combinations of spin and spatial wave function are:

ψ1(x1,x2)=ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)……… (1)


ψII(x1,x2)=ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)……… (2)

Where, ψn(x1)=2Lsinnπx1Land ψn'(x2)=2Lsinnπx2L

After interchanging the spatial state ψn(x1)and ψn'(x2)of ψ1(x1,x2), it become

ψI'(x1,x2)=ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)………. (3)

After Interchange the spatial state ψn(x1)and ψn'(x2)ofψII(x1,x2) , it become

ψII(x1,x2)=ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)…….. (4)

04

Determine the function

(b)

The two combinations of spin and spatial wave function are:

ψ1(x1,x2)=ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2) ……… (1)


ψII(x1,x2)=ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)……… (2)


Where, ψn(x1)=2Lsinnπx1Land ψn'(x2)=2Lsinnπx2L

After interchanging the spatial state ψn(x1)andψn'(x2) of ψ1(x1,x2), it become

ψI'(x1,x2)=ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)………. (3)

After Interchange the spatial stateψn(x1) and ψn'(x2)of ψII(x1,x2), it become

ψII(x1,x2)=ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)…….. (4)

05

Determine the function

(c)

The two combinations of spin and spatial wave function are:

ψ1(x1,x2)=ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2) ……… (1)


ψII(x1,x2)=ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)……… (2)

Where, ψn(x1)=2Lsinnπx1L and ψn'(x2)=2Lsinnπx2L

Add states (I) and (II) together to obtain

ψsum=ψ1(x1,x2)+ψ11(x1,x2)ψsum=ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)ψsum=[ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)(+)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)(+)]ψsum=[ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)](+)

06

Determine the function

(d)

Algebraic sum of state I and state II isψsum=[ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)](+)

ψsum=[ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)](+)

Interchanging spatial state alone,

ψA,sum=[ψn(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn(x1)](+)ψA,sum=[ψn'(x2)ψn(x1)ψn(x2)ψn'(x1)](+)ψA,sum=[ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)](+)

So, it asymmetric

Interchanging spin state alone,

ψs,sum=[ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)](+)[ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)](+)

Interchanging spin doesn't change the sign, so it is symmetric.

07

Determine the function

(e)

Algebraic sum of state I and state II isψsum=[ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)](+)

Swapping spatial state would change the sign of the algebraic sum, so it become asymmetric. But swapping spin state would not able to the sign of the algebraic sum, so it become symmetric.

ψsum=[ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)](+)

So, first swapping spatial state

ψsum'=[ψn(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn(x1)](+)

Secondly swap spin state

ψsum'=[ψn(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn(x1)](+)

Rearranging the above function

ψsum'=[ψn'(x2)ψn(x1)ψn(x2)ψn'(x1)](+)ψsum'=[ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)](+)ψsum'=ψsum

08

Determine the function 

(f)

Since, multiple of particle states I and II are neither symmetric nor antisymmetric but the sum of the state ψsumis asymmetric so it would be preferred to keep the repelling particles farther apart, to keep retain the lower energy.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Slater determinant is introduced in Exercise 42. Show that if states nand n'of the infinite well are occupied and both spins are up, the Slater determinant yields the antisymmetric multiparticle state:ψn(x1)ψn'(x2)ψn'(x1)ψn(x2)

A lithium atom has three electrons. These occupy individual particle states corresponding to the sets of four quantum numbers given by .

(n,l,ml,mj)=(1,0,0,+12),(1,0,0,-12)and(2,0,0,+12)

Using ψ1,0,0(rj),ψ1,0,0(rj),andψ2,0,0(rj) to represent the individual-particle states when occupied by particlej . Apply the Slater determinant discussed in Exercise 42 to find an expression for an antisymmetric multiparticle state. Your answer should be sums of terms like .

ψ1,0,0(r1),ψ1,0,0(r2),andψ2,0,0(r3)

Question: Solving (or attempting to solve!) a 4-electron problem is not twice as hard as solving a 2-electrons problem. Would you guess it to be more or less than twice as hard? Why?

To determine the value of Z at which the relativistic effects might affect energies and whether it applies to all orbiting electrons or to some more than others, also guess if it is acceptable to combine quantum mechanical results.

Is intrinsic angular momentum "real" angular momentum? The famous Einstein-de Haas effect demonstrates it. Although it actually requires rather involved techniques and high precision, consider a simplified case. Suppose you have a cylinder 2cmin diameter hanging motionless from a thread connected at the very center of its circular top. A representative atom in the cylinder has atomic mass 60 and one electron free to respond to an external field. Initially, spin orientations are as likely to be up as down, but a strong magnetic field in the upward direction is suddenly applied, causing the magnetic moments of all free electrons to align with the field.

(a) Viewed from above, which way would the cylinder rotate?

(b) What would be the initial rotation rate?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free