Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Here we consider adding two electrons to two "atoms," represented as finite wells. and investigate when the exclusion principle must be taken into account. In the accompanying figure, diagram (a) shows the four lowest-energy wave functions for a double finite well that represents atoms close together. To yield the lowest energy. the first electron added to this system must have wave function Aand is shared equally between the atoms. The second would al so have function Aand be equally shared. but it would have to be opposite spin. A third would have function B. Now consider atoms far a part diagram(b) shows, the bumps do not extend much beyond the atoms - they don't overlap-and functions Aand Bapproach equal energy, as do functions Cand D. Wave functionsAandBin diagram (b) describe essentially identical shapes in the right well. while being opposite in the left well. Because they are of equal energy. sums or differences ofandare now a valid alternative. An electron in a sum or difference would have the same energy as in either alone, so it would be just as "happy" inrole="math" localid="1659956864834" A,B,A+B, orA- B. Argue that in this spread-out situation, electrons can be put in one atom without violating the exclusion principle. no matter what states electrons occupy in the other atom.

Short Answer

Expert verified

E1/2=19h28mL2,   E1=5h28mL2,   E3/2=h2mL2

Step by step solution

01

Given information

StateEnergyn=1E1=12h28mL2n=2E2=22h28mL2n=3E3=32h28mL2

02

Concept of energy of particle in infinite square wall of length 

The energy of a particle in an infinite square well of length L is given by

En=n2h28mL2

03

Evaluate the energy of the particle in each state

Spin-1/2 Particles:

Since spin-1/2 particles are Fermions, the Pauli exclusion principle tells us that there can only be two particles in each state. So, in the minimum energy configuration, there will be two in the n=1state, two in the role="math" localid="1659957086918" n=2state, and one in the n=3state.

The energy of a particle in an infinite square well of lengthLis given by

En=n2h28mL2

Thus, the energies of the particles in each state are

StateEnergyn=1E1=12h28mL2n=2E2=22h28mL2n=3E3=32h28mL2

Therefore, the total energy for the system is

E=2E1+2E2+E3=19h28mL2

Spin-1 Particles:

Since spin-1 particles are Bosons, they do not obey the Pauli exclusion principle. Thus, every one of the particles may be in then=1 state. Therefore

E=5(1)2h28mL2=5h28mL2

Spin-3/2 Particles:

For spin-3/4 particles, there are four different possible value of ms:32,12,+12,+32.

Thus, without violation of the Pauli exclusion principle, four particles could have , with the fifth in the n=2.

Therefore, total energy will be E=4E1+E2=8h28mL2=h2mL2

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider row 4 of the periodic table. The trend is that the4xsubshell fills. Then the 3d, then the 4p.

(a) Judging by adherence to and deviation from this trend, whit might be said of the energy difference between the 4sand 3drelative to that between the 3dand 4p?

(b) Is this also true of row 5?

(c) Are these observations in qualitative agreement with Figure 8.13? Explain.

(a) To determine the repulsive energy between the two electrons in helium.

(b) To determine the distance of electrons that would have to be separated.

(c) To compare distance with approximate orbit radius in Z=2hydrogen like atom.

The 21cm Line: One of the most important windows to the mysteries of the cosmos is the 21cm line. With it astronomers map hydrogen throughout the universe. An important trait is that it involves a highly forbidden transition that is, accordingly, quite long-lived. But it is also an excellent example of the coupling of angular momentum. Hydrogen's ground state has no spin-orbit interaction—forl=0there is no orbit. However, the proton and electron magnetic moments do interact. Consider the following simple model.

(a) The proton seesitself surrounded by a spherically symmetric cloud of 1s electron, which has an intrinsic magnetic dipole moment/spin that of course, has a direction. For the purpose of investigating its effect the proton, treat this dispersed magnetic moment as behaving effectively like a single loop of current whose radius isa0then find the magnetic field at the middle of the loop in terms of e,,me , μ0anda0.

(b) The proton sits right in the middle of the electron's magnetic moment. Like the electron the proton is a spin12particle, with only two possible orientations in a magnetic field. Noting however, that its spin and magnetic moment are parallel rather than opposite, would the interaction energy be lower with the proton's spin aligned or anti-aligned with that of the electron?

(c) For the protongρ.is 5.6. Obtain a rough value for the energy difference between the two orientations.

(d) What would be the wavelength of a photon that carries away this energy difference?

Suppose that the channel’s outgoing end is in the hydrogen l=0Stem-Gerlach apparatus of the figure. You place a second such apparatus whose channel is aligned with the first but rotated 90°about the x-axis, so that its B –field lines point roughly in the y-direction instead of the. What would you see emerging at the end of your added apparatus? Consider the behavior of the spin-up and spin-down beams separately. Assume that when these beams are separated in the first apparatus, we can choose to block one or the other for study, but also assume that neither deviates too far from the center of the channel.

Compare and contrast the angular momentum and magnetic moment related to orbital motion with those that are intrinsic.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free