Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Two particles in a box occupy the n=1andn'=2individual-particle states. Given that the normalization constant is the same as in Example8.2(see Exercise 36), calculate for both the symmetric and antisymmetric states the probability that both particles would be found in the left side of the box (i.e., between 0 and13L)?

Short Answer

Expert verified

0.430 for symmetric and 0.070 for anti-symmetric

Step by step solution

01

Given information: 

Two particles in a box occupy then=1 andn'=2 individual-particle states.

02

Concept of symmetric wave function

The symmetric function is

ψs(x1,x2)=2L((sinπx1Lsin2πx2L+sin2πx1Lsinπx2L)(1)

ψs(x1,x2)=2L(sinπx1Lsin2πx2Lsin2πx1Lsinπx2L)..(2)

Equations (1) and (2) can be written as

ψ(x1,x2)=2L(sinπx1Lsin2πx2L±sin2πx1Lsinπx2L)..(3)

Where "+" sign represents symmetric wave function and “ -” sign represents anti-symmetric wave function. Probability to find one particle in the two particle wave function in rangerole="math" localid="1659950017144" x1tox1+dx1and the another in rangerole="math" localid="1659950029523" x2tox2+dx2isrole="math" localid="1659950072860" |ψ(x1,x2)|2dx1dx2,|ψ(x1,x2)|2dx1dx2

03

Substitute value of ψ(x1,x2)

The probability of finding both particles in the right half of the box, that is for bothxand x z in the range from 0 toL/2is therefore,

Prighl=0I/20I/2|ψ(x1,x2)|dx1dx2..(4)

Substitute the value of ψ(x1,x2)from equation (3) into Equation (4) we get

Prightr localid="1659950570417" =2L20L/20I/2sinπx]Lsin2πxzL±sin2πx1Lsinπx2L2dx1dxz.(5)

Prights=4L20I/2sin2πxLdx01/2sin22πxLdxlocalid="1659950915322" ±4l20L/2sin2πxLsinπxLdx2(6)

The integralx1in equation (6).

01/Lsin2πxLsinπxLdx=0IIL2sinπxLcosπxLsinπxLdx=2Lπ01/2sin2πxLdsinπxL=LL3π.(7)

04

Evaluate equation (6)

The integrals 01/2sin2πxLdxin equation (6) have the form

sin2axdx=12x14asin2ax(8)

And can be evaluated as

0I/2sin2nπxLdx=12xL4sin2nπxL0I/2=L4..(9)

Use Equation7 and9 to evaluate Equation (6)

P=4L2L42±4L22L3x2=0.25±169x2=0.25±0.1803=0.430or0.070

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The general form for symmetric and antisymmetric wave functions isψn(x2)ψn(x2)±ψn(x1)ψn(x2) but it is not normalized.

(a) In applying quantum mechanics, we usually deal with quantum states that are "orthonormal." That is, if we integrate over all space the square of any individual-particle function, such asψn(x2)ψn(x2)±ψn(x1)ψn(x2), we get 1, but for the product of different individual-particle functions, such asψnφ(x)ψn,(x), we get 0. This happens to be true for all the systems in which we have obtained or tabulated sets of wave functions (e.g., the particle in a box, the harmonic oscillator, and the hydrogen atom). Assuming that this holds, what multiplicative constant would normalize the symmetric and antisymmetric functions?

(b) What valueAgives the vectorV=A(x^±y^)unit length?

(c) Discuss the relationship between your answers in (a) and (b)?

Consider row 4 of the periodic table. The trend is that the4xsubshell fills. Then the 3d, then the 4p.

(a) Judging by adherence to and deviation from this trend, whit might be said of the energy difference between the 4sand 3drelative to that between the 3dand 4p?

(b) Is this also true of row 5?

(c) Are these observations in qualitative agreement with Figure 8.13? Explain.

Here we consider adding two electrons to two "atoms," represented as finite wells. and investigate when the exclusion principle must be taken into account. In the accompanying figure, diagram (a) shows the four lowest-energy wave functions for a double finite well that represents atoms close together. To yield the lowest energy. the first electron added to this system must have wave function Aand is shared equally between the atoms. The second would al so have function Aand be equally shared. but it would have to be opposite spin. A third would have function B. Now consider atoms far a part diagram(b) shows, the bumps do not extend much beyond the atoms - they don't overlap-and functions Aand Bapproach equal energy, as do functions Cand D. Wave functionsAandBin diagram (b) describe essentially identical shapes in the right well. while being opposite in the left well. Because they are of equal energy. sums or differences ofandare now a valid alternative. An electron in a sum or difference would have the same energy as in either alone, so it would be just as "happy" inrole="math" localid="1659956864834" A,B,A+B, orA- B. Argue that in this spread-out situation, electrons can be put in one atom without violating the exclusion principle. no matter what states electrons occupy in the other atom.

The total-spin singlet state for two electrons has one spin up and one down, but one of the triplet states does. too. What is the difference?

Whether adding spins to get total spin, spin and orbit to get total angular momentum, or total angular momenta to get a "grand total" angular momentum, addition rules are always the same: Given J1=j1(j1+1)andJ2=j2(j2+1) . Where is an angular momentum (orbital. spin. or total) and a quantum number. the total isJT=jT(jT+1) , where jTmay take on any value between |j1-j2|and j1+j2in integral steps: and for each value ofJΓJTz=mπf . where mπmay take on any of2jr+I possible values in integral steps from-jT for +jTSince separately there would be 2j1+1possible values form11 and2j2+ I formρ2 . the total number of stales should be(2j1+1)(2j2+1) . Prove it: that is, show that the sum of the2jT+1 values formit over all the allowed values forj7 is (2j1+1)(2j2+1). (Note: Here we prove in general what we verified in Example 8.5for the specialcase j1=3,j2=12.)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free