Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

The electron is known to have a radius no larger than 1018m. If actually produced by circulating mass, its intrinsic angular momentum of roughlywould imply very high speed, even if all that mass were as far from the axis as possible.

(a) Using simplyrp(from |r × p|) for the angular momentum of a mass at radius r, obtain a rough value of p and show that it would imply a highly relativistic speed.

(b) At such speeds,E=γmc2andp=γmucombine to giveEpc(just as for the speedy photon). How does this energy compare with the known internal energy of the electron?

Short Answer

Expert verified
  1. The rough value of p is1.055×1016kgm/s.
  2. This energy is much greater than the known internal energy of the electron.

Step by step solution

01

Definition of spin angular momentum

The spin angular momentum of light (SAM) is the component of the angular momentum of light that is associated with the quantum spin and the rotation between the polarization degrees of freedom of the photon.

02

Aim of the question

This question aims to prove that the intrinsic/spin angular momentum(S) of the electron does not have a classical analog. Part (a) of this question instructs us to use the simple formula for angular momentum (L=r×p)to prove that such an angular momentum of a value roughly equalingh would imply a relativistic speed. Part (b) asks us to compare the relativistic energy with the known internal/rest energy of the electron.

03

Determine the value of p(a)

Taking the intrinsic angular momentum of the electron (Sh)to simply equal rpwhere the electron's radius is taken to be 1018m, we can calculate the momentum pas follows,

S=rp

=(1018m)p

p=1018m=1.005×1034Js1018m=1.055×1016kgm/s.............................(2)

If we treatpit classically, this would mean that the electron's speed has the value

u=pm=1.055×1016kgm/s9.1×1031kg=1.16×1014m/s

This value is much greater than the speed of light (c=3×108m/s)which is not allowed according to the special theory of relativity. So next, we try to treat prelativistically to get u.

The relativistic momentum is given by p=γmuwhere γ=11u2/c2.

Accordingly, solving for u gives us the following formula,

u=(p/m)21+(p/m)2/c2

We have already calculatedp/me in our failed attempt to treat pclassically. Substituting then- gives us

u=(1.16×1014m/s)21+(1.16×1014m/s)2/(3×108m/s)2=3×108m/s

Which equals the speed of light!

Therefore the rough value of p is1.055×1016kgm/s.

04

Energy Comparison(b)

At such high relativistic speeds, the electron's energy can be approximated as

Epc=(1.055×1016kgm/s)(3×108m/s)=3.165×108J=2×1011eV

Whereas the rest energy of the electron is

Eo=mc2=(9.1×1031kg)(3×108m/s)2=8.19×1014J=5.1×105eV

Accordingly,E>>Eo and the approximationEpc is justified.

These results imply that the electron behaves similar to a with speed which is not the reality of the situation

Therefore energy is much greater than the known internal energy of the electron.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is the minimum possible energy for five (non-interacting) spin -12particles of massmin a one dimensional box of length L ? What if the particles were spin-1? What if the particles were spin -32?

Question: In nature, lithium exists in two isotopes: lithium-6, with three neutrons in its nucleus, and lithium-7, with four as individual atoms, would these behave as Bosons or as Fermions? Might a gas of either behave as a gas of Bosons? Explain.

Consider Z=19potassium. As a rough approximation assume that each of itsn=1electron s orbits 19 pro. tons and half an electron-that is, on average, half its fellown=1electron. Assume that each of itsn=2electrons orbits 19 protons, two Is electrons. and half of the seven othern=2electrons. Continue the process, assuming that electrons at eachorbit a correspondingly reduced positive charge. (At each, an electron also orbits some of the electron clouds of higher. but we ignore this in our rough approximation.)

(a) Calculate in terms ofa0the orbit radii of hydrogenlike atoms of these effective Z,

(b) The radius of potassium is often quoted at around0.22nm. In view of this, are yourn=1throughn=3radii reasonable?

(c) About how many more protons would have to be "unscreened" to then=4electron to agree with the quoted radius of potassium? Considering the shape of its orbit, should potassium'sn=4electron orbit entirely outside all the lower-electrons?

In its ground state, nitrogen's 2p electrons interact to produce jT=32. Given Hund's rule, how might the orbit at angular momenta of these three electrons combine?

The hydrogen spin-orbit interaction energy given in equation (8-25) is (μ0e2/4πmr2r3)S. L. Using a reasonable value for in terms of a0and the relationships S=32and L=ε(+1)h, show that this energy is proportional to a typical hydrogen atom energy by the factorα2 . where αis the fine structure constant.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free