Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

A hydrogen atom is subjected to a magnetic field Bstrong enough to completely overwhelm the spin-orbit coupling. Into how many levels would the 2p level split, and what would be the spacing between them?

Short Answer

Expert verified

5 levels,

And energy difference isE=ehB2m

Step by step solution

01

total energy of magnetic field

In the case of a strong magnetic field Bsuch as this one, the total energy Eis given by

E=ehB2m(ml+ms)+Eo...................(1)

where Eois the zero-field energydata-custom-editor="chemistry" (B=0).

02

find level splits

The possible values for ml arel=1

ml=-1,0,1.............2

Since ms can have values of ±12, we conclude that the 2p level splits into 3+2=5 levels, since there are 3 possible values for ml and 2 possible values for ms.

The quantityml+2ms can have values of

role="math" localid="1658468430759" ml+2ms=-2,-1,0,1,2............3

For example, let us take the following two levels:ml+2ms=1 and ml+2ms=2.

03

energy difference ∆E

The energy differenceE is then (we use Eq. (l))

E=ehB2m2-1E=ehB2m

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Here we consider adding two electrons to two "atoms," represented as finite wells. and investigate when the exclusion principle must be taken into account. In the accompanying figure, diagram (a) shows the four lowest-energy wave functions for a double finite well that represents atoms close together. To yield the lowest energy. the first electron added to this system must have wave function Aand is shared equally between the atoms. The second would al so have function Aand be equally shared. but it would have to be opposite spin. A third would have function B. Now consider atoms far a part diagram(b) shows, the bumps do not extend much beyond the atoms - they don't overlap-and functions Aand Bapproach equal energy, as do functions Cand D. Wave functionsAandBin diagram (b) describe essentially identical shapes in the right well. while being opposite in the left well. Because they are of equal energy. sums or differences ofandare now a valid alternative. An electron in a sum or difference would have the same energy as in either alone, so it would be just as "happy" inrole="math" localid="1659956864834" A,B,A+B, orA- B. Argue that in this spread-out situation, electrons can be put in one atom without violating the exclusion principle. no matter what states electrons occupy in the other atom.

Question: Show that the frequency at which an electron’s intrinsic magnetic dipole moment would process in a magnetic field is given by ωeBme. Calculate the frequency for a field of 1.0 T.

Determine the rank according to increasing wavelength ofkα,kβ andLα.

Consider row 4 of the periodic table. The trend is that the4xsubshell fills. Then the 3d, then the 4p.

(a) Judging by adherence to and deviation from this trend, whit might be said of the energy difference between the 4sand 3drelative to that between the 3dand 4p?

(b) Is this also true of row 5?

(c) Are these observations in qualitative agreement with Figure 8.13? Explain.

The wave functions for the ground and first excited states of a simple harmonic oscillator are Aebx2/2andBxebx2/2. Suppose you have two particles occupying these two states.

(a) If distinguishable, an acceptable wave function would berole="math" localid="1659955524302" Aebx12/2Bx2ebx22/2. Calculate the probability that both particles would be on the positive side of the origin and divide by the total probability for both being found over all values ofx1,x2. (This kind of normalizing-as-we-go will streamline things.)

(b) Suppose now that the particles are indistinguishable. Using the±symbol to reduce your work. calculate the same probability ratio, but assuming that their multiparticle wave function is either symmetric or antisymmetric. Comment on your results.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free