Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Using the general rule for adding angular momenta discussed in Section 8.7 and further in Exercise 66, Find the allowed values ofjTfor three spin 12 fermions. First add two, then add the third.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The values of jTallowed for three spin 12fermions is jT=12,32.

Step by step solution

01

Given data

Three spin is 12fermions.

02

Formula of spin fermions

To get the allowed values of jTfor three fermions, first tile allowed values are gotten for two spin 12fermions as follows:

jTmax=j1+j2jTmin=|j1-j2|

03

Find the values of jT allowed for three spin 12 fermions

Find the values of jTallowed for three spin 12fermions.

role="math" localid="1658389841980" jTmin=j1-j2,jTmax=j1+j2jTmin=12-12,jTmax=12+12jTmin=0,jTmax=1

Since those have a difference of just 1, those are the only allowed valued for two fermions.

So the allowed are then checked for three fermions by having the new j1be 0 or 1 with the j2still being 1/2.

jTmin1=j1-j2,jTmax1=j1+j2jTmin1=0-12,jTmax1=0+12$jTmin1=12,jTmax1=12

Similarly calculate as shown below.

jTmin2=j1-j2,jTmax2=j1+j2jTmin2=1-12,jTmax2=1+12jTmin2=12,jTmax2=32

And then the two sets can be combined to get the total allowed values jT=12,32.

The two sets can be combined to get the total allowed values jT=12,32.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Here we consider adding two electrons to two "atoms," represented as finite wells. and investigate when the exclusion principle must be taken into account. In the accompanying figure, diagram (a) shows the four lowest-energy wave functions for a double finite well that represents atoms close together. To yield the lowest energy. the first electron added to this system must have wave function Aand is shared equally between the atoms. The second would al so have function Aand be equally shared. but it would have to be opposite spin. A third would have function B. Now consider atoms far a part diagram(b) shows, the bumps do not extend much beyond the atoms - they don't overlap-and functions Aand Bapproach equal energy, as do functions Cand D. Wave functionsAandBin diagram (b) describe essentially identical shapes in the right well. while being opposite in the left well. Because they are of equal energy. sums or differences ofandare now a valid alternative. An electron in a sum or difference would have the same energy as in either alone, so it would be just as "happy" inrole="math" localid="1659956864834" A,B,A+B, orA- B. Argue that in this spread-out situation, electrons can be put in one atom without violating the exclusion principle. no matter what states electrons occupy in the other atom.

The general form for symmetric and antisymmetric wave functions isฯˆn(x2)ฯˆn(x2)ยฑฯˆnโ‹…(x1)ฯˆn(x2) but it is not normalized.

(a) In applying quantum mechanics, we usually deal with quantum states that are "orthonormal." That is, if we integrate over all space the square of any individual-particle function, such asฯˆn(x2)ฯˆn(x2)ยฑฯˆnโ‹…(x1)ฯˆn(x2), we get 1, but for the product of different individual-particle functions, such asฯˆnฯ†(x)ฯˆn,(x), we get 0. This happens to be true for all the systems in which we have obtained or tabulated sets of wave functions (e.g., the particle in a box, the harmonic oscillator, and the hydrogen atom). Assuming that this holds, what multiplicative constant would normalize the symmetric and antisymmetric functions?

(b) What valueAgives the vectorV=A(x^ยฑy^)unit length?

(c) Discuss the relationship between your answers in (a) and (b)?

Question: Lithium is chemically reactive. What if electrons were spin 32instead of spin12. What value of Z would result in an elements reactive in roughly the same way as lithium? What if electrons were instead spin-1?

Repeat example 8.6 but assume that the upper state is the 2p12rather than the2p32

Slater Determinant: A convenient and compact way of expressing multi-particle states of anti-symmetric character for many fermions is the Slater determinant:

|ฯˆn1x1m31ฯˆn2x1m32ฯˆn3x1m33ยทยทยทฯˆnNx1msNฯˆn1x2m11ฯˆn2x2m32ฯˆn3x2m33ยทยทยทฯˆฯˆn1x2msNฯˆn3x3m31ฯˆn2x3m12ฯˆn3x3m33ฯˆnNx3msNยทยทยทยทยทยทยทยทยทยทยทยทยทยทยทฯˆn1xNm11ฯˆn2xNm32ฯˆn3xNm33ยทยทยทฯˆnNxNmsN|

It is based on the fact that for N fermions there must be Ndifferent individual-particle states, or sets of quantum numbers. The ith state has spatial quantum numbers (which might be ni,โ„“i, and mfi) represented simply byni and spin quantum number msi. Were it occupied by the ith particle, the slate would beฯˆni(xj)msi a column corresponds to a given state and a row to a given particle. For instance, the first column corresponds to individual particle state ฯˆn(xj)ms1. Where jprogresses (through the rows) from particle 1 to particle N. The first row corresponds to particle I. which successively occupies all individual-particle states (progressing through the columns). (a) What property of determinants ensures that the multiparticle state is 0 if any two individual particle states are identical? (b) What property of determinants ensures that switching the labels on any two particles switches the sign of the multiparticle state?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free