Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /var/www/html/web/app/themes/studypress-core-theme/template-parts/header/mobile-offcanvas.php on line 20

Demonstrate that equations (2 - 12) and (2 - 13) become the classical transformation equations (2 - 1) when v << c, except when applied to events very far away, in which case time is still not absolute.

Short Answer

Expert verified

At low speeds, the Lorentz transformation equations will change into the well-known classical Galilean transformation equations, with the exception that time will start to take up a component that relies on location, making it no longer be an absolute. The influence must be considered even though we won't recognise it until we are very far away from reality.

Step by step solution

01

Write the given data from the question.

Consider that equations (2 - 12) and (2 - 13) become the classical transformation equations (2 - 1) when v << c.

02

Determine the formula of Lorentz transformation equations at low speeds.

Write the formula of Lorentz transformation equations at low speeds.

x'=γv(x-vt) …… (1)

Here, γv is relativistic velocity transformation, t is time, v is speed, x is transformation position and c speed of light.

03

Determine the value of Lorentz transformation equations at low speeds.

The Galilean transformation, which is ultimately expressed in Newton's equations, should be the limit of the Lorentz transformation. Let's see what a Lorentz transformation will appear to be at different speeds.

Determine the Lorentz transformation equations at low speeds (v << c).

Substitute 11-v2c2for γvinto equation (1).

x'=11-v2c2x-vt

Since,

v<<c1-v2c21

Then will be:

x'=x-vt …… (2)

In essence, you will do the same for the remaining equations: put the factor of equal to one, and then rewrite the equations as follows:

t'=t-vxc2 …… (3)

Then, Galilean transformation equations are:

x=x'+vt' …… (4)

And time equations are:

t=t'+vx'c2 …… (5)

The Galilean transformation is perfectly represented by equations (3) and (5), but if you look at the time equations (Eqs 4 and 6), you'll see that it wasn't entirely recovered. We kind of adopted some of the concepts from special relativity, which holds that time is relative and dependent on one's position in space rather than being an absolute. At low velocities, this effect will, however, be insignificant and imperceptible due to the speed of light squared in the denominator of the second term. Large distances, or particularly big distances, require study of this issue since it becomes relevant in certain cases.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

What is the ratio of the relativistically correct expression for momentum to the classical expression? Under what condition does the deviation become significant?

Question: Equation (2-38) show that four-momentum of a particle obeys a Lorentz transformation. If we sum momentum and energy over all particles in a system, we see that the total momentum and energy also constitute a four-vector. It follows that (Etotal/c)2-Ptotal2 is the same quantity in any frame of reference. Depending on what is known, this can be a quicker route to solving problems than writing out momentum and energy conservation equations. In the laboratory frame, a particle of mass m and energy Ei collide with another particle of mass initially stationary, forming a single object of mass . (a) Determine the frame of reference where the after-collision situation is as simple as possible, then determine the invariant in that frame. (b) Calculate the invariant before the collision in the laboratory frame in terms of M and Ei . (You will need to use Ei2/c2-p2=m2c2 for the initially moving particle to eliminate its momentum.) Obtain an expression for M in terms of m and Ei . (c) Write out momentum and energy conservation in the laboratory frame, using uf for the speed of the initially moving particle and for the speed of the final combined particle. Show that they give the same result for M in terms of m and Ei. (Note: The identity γu2u2=γu2c2-c2 will be very handy.)

An object of mass 3mo moves to the right at 0.8c.

a) Calculate its momentum and energy.

b) Using the relativistic velocity transformation, determine its velocity in a new frame of reference moving it to right at 0.5c, then using it to determine the object's momentum and energy in this new frame.

c) Verify that equations role="math" localid="1657556434416" (2-38) are satisfied.

Question: A rocket maintains a constant thrust F, giving it an acceleration of g

(i.e.,9.8m/s2).

(a) If classical physics were valid, how long would it take for the rocket’s speed to reach 0.99c??

(b) Using the result of exercise 117(c), how long would it really take to reach 0.99c??

u=11+(Ft/mc)2FTt

Consider Anna, Bob and Carl in the twin paradox.

(a) According to Anna, when Planet X passes her, clocks on Planet X and Earth tick simultaneously. What is the time interval between these two events in the Earth-Planet X frame?

(b) According to Carl, when Planet X passes, clocks on Planet X and Earth tick simultaneously. What is the time interval between these two events in the Earth-Planet X frame?

(c) What does the clock on Planet X read when Carl and Anna reach it? Show how your results from part (a) and (b) agree with Figure 2.20.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free